THE DYNAMICS OF DELINQUENT PEERS AND DELINQUENT BEHAVIOR

This analysis examines the dynamic reciprocal relationship between delinquent peer associations and delinquent behavior. It tests the hypothesis, derived from learning and interactional theories, that delinquent peers and delinquent behavior are reciprocally related—delinquent peer associations foster future delinquency, and delinquency increases the likelihood of associating with delinquent peers. It also tests the competing hypothesis, derived from control theories, that delinquent peers do not cause delinquency, but instead, the relationship is (1) spurious due to individual criminal propensity, (2) a result of the effects of delinquent behavior on future associations with delinquent peers, or (3) an artifact of problems of measuring delinquent peers. To test these propositions, we use data from the National Youth Survey and estimate a cross-lagged panel model that corrects for measurement error in indicators of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. The model species a covariance structure model for ordinal measures. Parameters are estimated by (1) estimating a threshold model relating ordinal measures to continuous latent variables; (2) estimating a matrix of polychoric correlations relating observed variables, and (3) using an asymptotic distribution-free estimator to estimate structural parameters. The results suggest that delinquent peer associations and delinquent behavior are reciprocally related, but the effect of delinquency on peer associations is larger than that of peer associations on delinquency.

[1]  M. Polakowski,et al.  Linking self- and social control with deviance: Illuminating the structure underlying a general theory of crime and its relation to deviant activity , 1994 .

[2]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  CAUSES OF WHITE‐COLLAR CRIME* , 1987 .

[3]  R. Matsueda.  Testing control theory and differential association: A causal modeling approach. , 1982 .

[4]  Harold G. Grasmick,et al.  Low self-control and imprudent behavior , 1993 .

[5]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  On the estimation of polychoric correlations and their asymptotic covariance matrix , 1994 .

[6]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF PAST TO FUTURE PARTICIPATION IN DELINQUENCY , 1991 .

[7]  D. Kandel.  The Parental and Peer Contexts of Adolescent Deviance: An Algebra of Interpersonal Influences , 1996 .

[8]  R. Akers.  Addiction: The Troublesome Concept , 1991 .

[9]  Mark Warr,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF DELINQUENT PEERS: WHAT THEY THINK OR WHAT THEY DO?* , 1991 .

[10]  S. Bahr,et al.  THE ROLE OF PEERS IN THE COMPLEX ETIOLOGY OF ADOLESCENT DRUG USE , 1987 .

[11]  Janet L. Lauritsen,et al.  SIBLING RESEMBLANCE IN JUVENILE DELINQUENCY: FINDINGS FROM THE NATIONAL YOUTH SURVEY , 1993 .

[12]  T. P. Thornberry,et al.  TOWARD AN INTERACTIONAL THEORY OF DELINQUENCY , 1987 .

[13]  S. R. Burkett,et al.  RELIGIOSITY, PEER ASSOCIATIONS, AND ADOLESCENT MARIJUANA USE: A PANEL STUDY OF UNDERLYING CAUSAL STRUCTURES* , 1987 .

[14]  K. Land,et al.  AGE, CRIMINAL CAREERS, AND POPULATION HETEROGENEITY: SPECIFICATION AND ESTIMATION OF A NONPARAMETRIC, MIXED POISSON MODEL* , 1993 .

[15]  J. Rodgers,et al.  Adolescent Sexual Activity and Mildly Deviant Behavior , 1990 .

[16]  J. H. Steiger.  Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[17]  Wai-Yin Poon,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of multivariate polyserial and polychoric correlation coefficients , 1988 .

[18]  H. Costner.  Theory, Deduction, and Rules of Correspondence , 1969, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  J. Short,et al.  Differential Association with Delinquent Friends and Delinquent Behavior , 1958 .

[20]  F. Lorenz,et al.  TWO ROUTES TO DELINQUENCY: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN EARLY AND LATE STARTERS IN THE IMPACT OF PARENTING AND DEVIANT PEERS* , 1994 .

[21]  Karen Heimer,et al.  Race, Family Structure, and Delinquency: A Test of Differential Association and Social Control Theories. , 1987 .

[22]  Maynard L. Erickson,et al.  Delinquency is still group behavior: Toward revitalizing the group premise in the sociology of deviance. , 1977 .

[23]  Mark Warr.  Parents/Peers, and Delinquency , 1993 .

[24]  D. Elliott,et al.  Social Class and Delinquent Behavior in a National Youth Panel: 1976–1980 , 1983 .

[25]  D. Rowe,et al.  SIBLING EFFECTS ON SUBSTANCE USE AND DELINQUENCY , 1992 .

[26]  I. Piliavin,et al.  Delinquency, Situational Inducements, and Commitment to Conformity , 1965 .

[27]  M. Browne.  Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. , 1984, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[28]  R. Matsueda.  The Dynamics of Moral Beliefs and Minor Deviance , 1989 .

[29]  H. L. Voss.  Differential Association and Reported Delinquent Behavior: A Replication , 1964 .

[30]  Delbert S. Elliott,et al.  An Integrated Theoretical Perspective on Delinquent Behavior , 1979 .

[31]  Robert Brame,et al.  MULTIPLE ROUTES TO DELINQUENCY? A TEST OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND GENERAL THEORIES OF CRIME , 1997 .

[32]  R. Meier,et al.  Sanctions Peers, and Deviance: Preliminary Models Of A Social Control Process* , 1983 .

[33]  R. Matsueda.  Reflected Appraisals, Parental Labeling, and Delinquency: Specifying a Symbolic Interactionist Theory , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  D. Kandel.  Homophily, Selection, and Socialization in Adolescent Friendships , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  L. Lanza-Kaduce,et al.  Social learning and deviant behavior: a specific test of a general theory. , 1979, American sociological review.

[36]  S. J. Jang,et al.  DELINQUENT PEERS, BELIEFS, AND DELINQUENT BEHAVIOR: A LONGITUDINAL TEST OF INTERACTIONAL THEORY* , 1994 .

[37]  K. Heimer,et al.  Role-Taking, Role Commitment, and Delinquency: A Theory of Differential Social Control , 1994 .

[38]  D. McDowall,et al.  Reciprocal Causal Relationships among Drug Use, Peers, and Beliefs: A Five-Wave Panel Model , 1996 .

[39]  R. Matsueda.  `Cultural Deviance Theory': , 1997 .

[40]  S. Menard,et al.  Changes in Conventional Attitudes and Delinquent Behavior in Adolescence , 1994 .

[41]  A. Liska.  Interpreting the Causal Structure of Differential Association Theory , 1969 .

[42]  Ulf Olsson,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient , 1979 .

[43]  Mark Warr.  ORGANIZATION AND INSTIGATION IN DELINQUENT GROUPS , 1996 .

[44]  M. Hindelang.  Causes of Delinquency: A Partial Replication and Extension , 1973 .

[45]  J. J. F. Short.  Differential Association and Delinquency , 1957 .

[46]  R. Matsueda,et al.  The Current State of Differential Association Theory , 1988 .

[47]  Mark Warr,et al.  AGE, PEERS, AND DELINQUENCY* , 1993 .