Social, spatial, and temporal organization in a complex insect society

High-density living is often associated with high disease risk due to density-dependent epidemic spread. Despite being paragons of high-density living, the social insects have largely decoupled the association with density-dependent epidemics. It is hypothesized that this is accomplished through prophylactic and inducible defenses termed ‘collective immunity’. Here we characterise segregation of carpenter ants that would be most likely to encounter infectious agents (i.e. foragers) using integrated social, spatial, and temporal analyses. Importantly, we do this in the absence of disease to establish baseline colony organization. Behavioural and social network analyses show that active foragers engage in more trophallaxis interactions than their nest worker and queen counterparts and occupy greater area within the nest. When the temporal ordering of social interactions is taken into account, active foragers and inactive foragers are not observed to interact with the queen in ways that could lead to the meaningful transfer of disease. Furthermore, theoretical resource spread analyses show that such temporal segregation does not appear to impact the colony-wide flow of food. This study provides an understanding of a complex society’s organization in the absence of disease that will serve as a null model for future studies in which disease is explicitly introduced.

[1]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  Social Transfer of Pathogenic Fungus Promotes Active Immunisation in Ant Colonies , 2012, PLoS biology.

[2]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[3]  Steven D. Prager,et al.  The dynamics of animal social networks: analytical, conceptual, and theoretical advances , 2014 .

[4]  Der-I Wang,et al.  The Division of Labor and Queen Attendance Behavior of Nosema-Infected Worker Honey Bees , 1970 .

[5]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  Opposing effects of allogrooming on disease transmission in ant societies , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[7]  James D. Thomson,et al.  Contact networks and transmission of an intestinal pathogen in bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) colonies , 2007, Oecologia.

[8]  P. Schmid-Hempel Parasites in Social Insects , 1998 .

[9]  B. Grenfell,et al.  Host densities as determinants of abundance in parasite communities , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[11]  J. Silverman Carpenter Ants of the United States and Canada , 2007 .

[12]  Dhruba Naug,et al.  Structure of the social network and its influence on transmission dynamics in a honeybee colony , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[13]  Shweta Bansal,et al.  Network frailty and the geometry of herd immunity , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Mevin B. Hooten,et al.  Continuous-time discrete-space models for animal movement , 2012, 1211.1992.

[15]  Nathalie Stroeymeyt,et al.  Organisational immunity in social insects. , 2014, Current opinion in insect science.

[16]  Nina H. Fefferman,et al.  Disease prevention and resistance in social insects: modeling the survival consequences of immunity, hygienic behavior, and colony organization , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  S. Cotter,et al.  Personal immunity versus social immunity , 2010 .

[18]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Automated image-based tracking and its application in ecology. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  E. Wilson,et al.  Caste and ecology in the social insects. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[20]  Isabelle M. Côté,et al.  Parasitism and group size in social animals: a meta-analysis , 1995 .

[21]  J. Traniello,et al.  Nest architecture, activity pattern, worker density and the dynamics of disease transmission in social insects. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[23]  F. Q. Ribeiro The meta-analysis , 2017, Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology.

[24]  Richard James,et al.  Temporal dynamics and network analysis , 2012 .

[25]  Nigel R Franks,et al.  Social insects: from selfish genes to self organisation and beyond. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  D.,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR , 2002 .

[27]  Mevin B. Hooten,et al.  Agent-Based Inference for Animal Movement and Selection , 2010 .

[28]  Simon Garnier,et al.  Stability and Responsiveness in a Self-Organized Living Architecture , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[29]  James S. Waters,et al.  Information Processing in Social Insect Networks , 2012, PloS one.

[30]  Scott Camazine,et al.  The role of colony organization on pathogen transmission in social insects. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  V. Isaeva Self-organization in biological systems , 2012, Biology Bulletin.

[32]  P. Schmid-Hempel,et al.  Social Immunity , 2007, Current Biology.

[33]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Waste management in the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica , 2002 .

[34]  D. H. Kistner 8 – Social and Evolutionary Significance of Social Insect Symbionts , 1979 .

[35]  C. Brooke Worth,et al.  The Insect Societies , 1973 .

[36]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The effect of individual variation on the structure and function of interaction networks in harvester ants , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[37]  T. Seeley,et al.  Group decision making in swarms of honey bees , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[38]  David C. Bell,et al.  Centrality measures for disease transmission networks , 1999, Soc. Networks.

[39]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Time-Ordered Networks Reveal Limitations to Information Flow in Ant Colonies , 2011, PloS one.

[40]  Mary Poss,et al.  Social Organization and Parasite Risk in Mammals: Integrating Theory and Empirical Studies , 2003 .

[41]  M. Sixt,et al.  Analogies in the evolution of individual and social immunity , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  Raphaël Jeanson,et al.  Long-term dynamics in proximity networks in ants , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  R. Burt Structural Holes versus Network Closure as Social Capital , 2001 .

[44]  A. Crespi,et al.  Tracking Individuals Shows Spatial Fidelity Is a Key Regulator of Ant Social Organization , 2013, Science.

[45]  Alessandro Cini,et al.  A Socio‐Spatial Combined Approach Confirms a Highly Compartmentalised Structure in Honeybees , 2014 .

[46]  Joseph M. Whitmeyer,et al.  Social Emergence: Societies as Complex Systems , 2006 .

[47]  M. Chapuisat,et al.  Evidence for collective medication in ants , 2003 .

[48]  Richard James,et al.  Emergency networking: famine relief in ant colonies , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  Dhruba Naug,et al.  Experimentally induced change in infectious period affects transmission dynamics in a social group , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  Rebeca B Rosengaus,et al.  Trophallaxis and prophylaxis: social immunity in the carpenter ant Camponotus pennsylvanicus , 2011, Biology Letters.

[51]  Jack W. Bradbury,et al.  Complexity and behavioral ecology , 2014 .

[52]  Eun-Ok Im,et al.  Theory and research. , 2012, Nursing research.