Dry anaerobic digestion of differently sorted organic municipal solid waste: a full-scale experience.

This paper presents a comparison of dry anaerobic digestion reactors fed with differently sorted municipal organic solid wastes. One reactor was fed with source sorted organic wastes and a second reactor was fed with mixed organic wastes consisting of grey wastes, mechanically selected municipal solid wastes and sludge. The two reactors utilised the same process (Valorga) and operational conditions at full scale. The results of the study emphasise the influence of the kind of treated material on the process performances, especially in terms of biogas and methane production, thus, energy reclamation. The reactor treating the source sorted organic waste and the reactor treating the mixed organic wastes generated some 200 m3 and 60 m3 of biogas per ton of waste treated, respectively, while the specific methane production was some 0.40 and 0.13 m3CH4/kgTVS, respectively. The mass balance and the final fate of the digested material from the two reactors were also clearly different. As for the costs, these were some 29 Euro per ton of treated waste (50% for personnel) and 53 Euro/ton for disposing of the rejected materials. Incomes were some 100 Euro/ton (on average) and an other 15 Euro/ton came from green certificates. The initial investment was 16 million Euros.

[1]  D Bolzonella,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes: process behaviour in transient conditions. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  D Bolzonella,et al.  Semi-dry thermophilic anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: focusing on the start-up phase. , 2003, Bioresource technology.

[3]  B. Ahring,et al.  Volatile fatty acids as indicators of process imbalance in anaerobic digestors , 1995, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[4]  H. F. D. Laclos,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid organic waste: Valorga full-scale plant in Tilburg, The Netherlands , 1997 .

[5]  Moktar Hamdi,et al.  Bioreactor performance in anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes , 2005 .

[6]  E M Biey,et al.  Solid waste digestors: process performance and practice for municipal solid waste digestion. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[7]  N. Muradov,et al.  From hydrocarbon to hydrogen–carbon to hydrogen economy , 2005 .

[8]  S. Desbois,et al.  Determinant impact of waste collection and composition on anaerobic digestion performance: industrial results. , 2000, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  F Cecchi,et al.  Performance of thermophilic semi-dry anaerobic digestion process changing the feed biodegradability. , 2000, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[10]  S Mace,et al.  Comparison of the biodegradability of the grey fraction of municipal solid waste of Barcelona in mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  L De Baere,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of solid waste: state-of-the-art. , 2000, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  Paolo Pavan,et al.  Anaerobic Fermentation of Organic Municipal Solid Wastes for the Production of Soluble Organic Compounds , 2005 .

[13]  A. Wellinger,et al.  Kompogas - A New System for the Anaerobic Treatment of Source Separated Waste , 1993 .

[14]  John A. Turner,et al.  Sustainable Hydrogen Production , 2004, Science.

[15]  L. Bere,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of solid waste: state-of-the-art , 2000 .

[17]  Joan Mata-Álvarez,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives , 2000 .