Sexual Self-Regulation and Cognitive Absorption as Factors of Sexual Response Toward Virtual Characters

The eye movements and penile responses of 20 male participants were recorded while they were immersed with virtual sexual stimuli. These participants were divided into two groups according to their capacity to focus their attention in immersion (high and low focus). In order to understand sexual self-regulation better, we subjected participants to three experimental conditions: (a) immersion with a preferred sexual stimulus, without sexual inhibition; (b) immersion with a preferred sexual stimulus, with sexual inhibition; and (c) immersion with a neutral stimulus. A significant difference was observed between the effects of each condition on erectile response and scanpath. The groups differed on self-regulation of their erectile responses and on their scanpath patterns. High focus participants had more difficulties than low focus participants with inhibiting their sexual responses and displayed less scattered eye movement trajectories over the critical areas of the virtual sexual stimuli. Results are interpreted in terms of sexual self-regulation and cognitive absorption in virtual immersion. In addition, the use of validated virtual sexual stimuli is presented as a methodological improvement over static and moving pictures, since it paves the way for the study of the role of social interaction in an ecologically valid and well-controlled way.

[1]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  Immersiveness and Physiological Arousal within Panoramic Video-Based Virtual Reality , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[2]  Anthony R. Beech,et al.  The integrated theory of sexual offending , 2006 .

[3]  P. Karoly Mechanisms of Self-Regulation: A Systems View , 1993 .

[4]  Gina M. Grimshaw,et al.  Eye-Tracking of Men’s Preferences for Waist-to-Hip Ratio and Breast Size of Women , 2011, Archives of sexual behavior.

[5]  Vernon L. Quinsey,et al.  The Discriminability of Rapists from Non-Sex Offenders Using Phallometric Measures , 1994 .

[6]  S. Bouchard,et al.  Using immersive virtual reality and ecological psychology to probe into child molesters' phenomenology , 2013 .

[7]  D. R. Laws,et al.  Sexual Response Faking By Pedophiles , 1978 .

[8]  Raafat George Saadé,et al.  The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Hemodynamic brain-computer interfaces for communication and rehabilitation , 2009, Neural Networks.

[10]  Ceri H. Davies,et al.  Loss of Hippocampal Serine Protease BSP1/Neuropsin Predisposes to Global Seizure Activity , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  E. B. Delabarre A method of recording eye-movements. , 1898 .

[12]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Self-Regulation Failure: An Overview , 1996 .

[13]  David C. de Jong The role of attention in sexual arousal: implications for treatment of sexual dysfunction. , 2009 .

[14]  S. Bouchard,et al.  Sexual affordances, perceptual-motor invariance extraction and intentional nonlinear dynamics: sexually deviant and non-deviant patterns in male subjects. , 2010, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[15]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  Patrice Renaud,et al.  L'utilisation de personnages virtuels et de technologies de suivi oculomoteur en clinique de la délinquance sexuelle , 2007 .

[17]  Tony Ward,et al.  Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The comprehensive good lives model of treatment for sexual offenders , 2006 .

[18]  Stéphane Bouchard,et al.  Measuring Sexual Preferences in Virtual Reality: A Pilot Study , 2002, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  H B Rubin,et al.  Instructional control of an autonomic sexual response. , 1969, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[20]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[21]  Donald E. Henson,et al.  VOLUNTARY CONTROL OF EROTICISM1 , 1971 .

[22]  Kim Wallen,et al.  Sex differences in viewing sexual stimuli: An eye-tracking study in men and women , 2007, Hormones and Behavior.

[23]  Gina M. Grimshaw,et al.  Eye Tracking of Men’s Preferences for Female Breast Size and Areola Pigmentation , 2011, Archives of sexual behavior.

[24]  Jeffrey A. Bouffard,et al.  Sexual Arousal and Self-Control , 2012 .

[25]  A. Tellegen,et al.  Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences ("absorption"), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. , 1974, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[26]  Peter J. Lang,et al.  Gaze Patterns When Looking at Emotional Pictures: Motivationally Biased Attention , 2004 .

[27]  Bartholomäus Wissmath,et al.  Immersion in Mediated Environments: The Role of Personality Traits , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[28]  G. Strauss,et al.  Sex Differences in Visual Attention to Erotic and Non-Erotic Stimuli , 2008, Archives of sexual behavior.

[29]  Jason Winters,et al.  Conscious Regulation of Sexual Arousal in Men , 2009, Journal of sex research.

[30]  K. Guo,et al.  Differential Gaze Behavior towards Sexually Preferred and Non-Preferred Human Figures , 2011, Journal of sex research.