Accuracy of Colposcopy in the Diagnostic Setting Compared With the Screening Setting

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the accuracy of colposcopy to identify cervical precancer in screening and diagnostic settings. METHODS: As part of a larger clinical trial to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of optical spectroscopy, we recruited 1,850 patients into a diagnostic or a screening group depending on their history of abnormal findings on Papanicolaou tests. Colposcopic examinations were performed and biopsies specimens obtained from abnormal and normal colposcopic sites for all patients. The criterion standard of test accuracy was the histologic report of biopsies. We calculated sensitivities, specificities, likelihood ratios, receiver operating characteristic curves, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The prevalence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) or cancer was 29.0% for the diagnostic group and 2.2% for the screening group. Using a disease threshold of HSIL, colposcopy had a sensitivity of 0.983 and a specificity of 0.451 in the diagnostic group when the test threshold was low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), and a sensitivity of 0.714 and a specificity of 0.813 when the test threshold was HSIL. Using the same HSIL disease threshold, in the screening group, colposcopy had a sensitivity of 0.286 and a specificity of 0.877 when the test threshold was LSIL, and a sensitivity of 0.191 and a specificity of 0.961 when the threshold was HSIL. The colposcopy area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.821 (95% confidence interval 0.79–0.85) in the diagnostic setting compared with 0.587 (95% confidence interval 0.56–0.62) in the screening setting. Changing the disease threshold to LSIL demonstrated similar patterns in the tradeoff of sensitivity and specificity and measure of accuracy. CONCLUSION: Colposcopy performs well in the diagnostic setting and poorly in the screening setting. Colposcopy should not be used to screen for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II

[1]  R. Kaufman,et al.  Colposcopically directed biopsy and loop excision of the transformation zone. Comparison of histologic findings. , 1995, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[2]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[3]  J. L. Benedet,et al.  The Quality of Community Colposcopic Practice , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  M. Frydenberg,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of cytology and colposcopy in cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions , 1994, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[5]  University of ZimbabweJHPIEGO Cervical Cancer Project.  Visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical-cancer screening: test qualities in a primary-care setting , 1999, The Lancet.

[6]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine , 2002 .

[7]  Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  J. Pintos,et al.  Human papillomavirus testing improves the accuracy of colposcopy in detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia , 2004, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[9]  D. Sackett,et al.  The Ends of Human Life: Medical Ethics in a Liberal Polity , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  R. Richart,et al.  Treatment of cervical dysplasia by outpatient electrocauterization. , 1968, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  John W. Sellows,et al.  Colposcopy and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia : a beginners' manual . Sellors, R. Sankaranarayanan , 2003 .

[12]  R. Richards-Kortum,et al.  Screening for squamous intraepithelial lesions with fluorescence spectroscopy. , 1999, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  Calum MacAulay,et al.  Kappa statistics to measure interrater and intrarater agreement for 1790 cervical biopsy specimens among twelve pathologists: qualitative histopathologic analysis and methodologic issues. , 2005, Gynecologic oncology.

[14]  Y. Qiao,et al.  Shanxi Province Cervical Cancer Screening Study: a cross-sectional comparative trial of multiple techniques to detect cervical neoplasia. , 2001, Gynecologic oncology.

[15]  S. Tatti,et al.  Comparing PAP smear cytology, aided visual inspection, screening colposcopy, cervicography and HPV testing as optional screening tools in Latin America. Study design and baseline data of the LAMS study. , 2005, Anticancer research.

[16]  P. Walker,et al.  International Terminology of Colposcopy: An Updated Report From the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  J. L. Benedet,et al.  Colposcopic Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Microinvasive and Occult Invasive Carcinoma of the Cervix , 1985, Obstetrics and gynecology.