Constraints on Statistical Learning Across Species

Both human and nonhuman organisms are sensitive to statistical regularities in sensory inputs that support functions including communication, visual processing, and sequence learning. One of the issues faced by comparative research in this field is the lack of a comprehensive theory to explain the relevance of statistical learning across distinct ecological niches. In the current review we interpret cross-species research on statistical learning based on the perceptual and cognitive mechanisms that characterize the human and nonhuman models under investigation. Considering statistical learning as an essential part of the cognitive architecture of an animal will help to uncover the potential ecological functions of this powerful learning process.

[1]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  The extraction and integration framework: a two-process account of statistical learning. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Sequential learning in non-human primates , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  W. Fitch The evolution of speech: a comparative review , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Jenny R. Saffran,et al.  All words are not created equal: Expectations about word length guide infant statistical learning , 2012, Cognition.

[5]  J. Mehler,et al.  The neonate brain detects speech structure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Many faces, one rule: the role of perceptual expertise in infants’ sequential rule learning , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[7]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Peter Marler,et al.  Vocal communication in the domestic chicken: I. Does a sender communicate information about the quality of a food referent to a receiver? , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  S. Soli,et al.  Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): II. Vocal signals. , 1987, Journal of comparative psychology.

[10]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Language as shaped by the brain. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[11]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience: An Introduction , 2015 .

[12]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Statistical Learning Across Development: Flexible Yet Constrained , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[13]  E. D. Brown,et al.  Analysis of warble song of the budgerigar Melopsittacus undulatus , 1992 .

[14]  Klaus Zuberbühler,et al.  Language evolution: Semantic combinations in primate calls , 2006, Nature.

[15]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Why Human Neonates Are So Altricial , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of new visual feature combinations by infants , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  R. Gómez,et al.  Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge , 1999, Cognition.

[18]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[19]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in the newborn infant , 2011, Cognition.

[20]  A. Clark Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[21]  L H HICKS,et al.  An analysis of number-concept formation in the Rhesus monkey. , 1956, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[22]  W. Tecumseh Fitch,et al.  Visual artificial grammar learning: comparative research on humans, kea (Nestor notabilis) and pigeons (Columba livia) , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  M. Hauser,et al.  Learning at a distance II. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies in a non-human primate , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  The long road of statistical learning research: past, present and future , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  L M Herman,et al.  Responses to anomalous gestural sequences by a language-trained dolphin: evidence for processing of semantic relations and syntactic information. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  Onur Güntürkün,et al.  Orthographic processing in pigeons (Columba livia) , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Carel ten Cate,et al.  Zebra finches can use positional and transitional cues to distinguish vocal element strings , 2015, Behavioural Processes.

[28]  M. Hauser,et al.  Can free-ranging rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) extract artificially created rules comprised of natural vocalizations? , 2009, Journal of comparative psychology.

[29]  Robert J Dooling,et al.  Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): III. Contact calls. , 1988, Journal of comparative psychology.

[30]  Marina Nespor,et al.  Perceptual and memory constraints on language acquisition , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Brock Ferguson,et al.  Communicative signals support abstract rule learning by 7-month-old infants , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[32]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Testing assumptions of statistical learning: Is it long-term and implicit? , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[33]  W. Tecumseh Fitch,et al.  Action at a distance: dependency sensitivity in a New World primate , 2013, Biology Letters.

[34]  R. Berwick,et al.  Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Infant-Directed Speech Facilitates Word Segmentation. , 2005, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[36]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  References and Notes , 2022 .

[37]  J. Saffran,et al.  Dog is a dog is a dog: Infant rule learning is not specific to language , 2007, Cognition.

[38]  M. Goldsmith,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996 .

[39]  J. Silk,et al.  The responses of female baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus) to anomalous social interactions: evidence for causal reasoning? , 1995, Journal of comparative psychology.

[40]  M. van der Schoot,et al.  The developmental onset of symbolic approximation: beyond nonsymbolic representations, the language of numbers matters , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[41]  Philip H. Price Developmental determinants of structure in zebra finch song. , 1979 .

[42]  M. Hauser,et al.  Grammatical pattern learning by human infants and cotton-top tamarin monkeys , 2008, Cognition.

[43]  R. Byrne,et al.  Titi monkey call sequences vary with predator location and type , 2013, Biology Letters.

[44]  J. Neiworth,et al.  Artificial Grammar Learning in Tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) in Varying Stimulus Contexts , 2017, Journal of comparative psychology.

[45]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Unsupervised statistical learning in newly hatched chicks , 2016, Current Biology.

[46]  J. B. Trobalon,et al.  Statistical computations over a speech stream in a rodent , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  R. Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[48]  Peter M. Vishton,et al.  Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. , 1999, Science.

[49]  Timothy Q. Gentner,et al.  Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds , 2006, Nature.

[50]  R. Andrew Neural and behavioural plasticity : the use of the domestic chick as a model , 1991 .

[51]  Ofer Tchernichovski,et al.  Statistical learning in songbirds: from self-tutoring to song culture , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  R. Aslin,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article UNSUPERVISED STATISTICAL LEARNING OF HIGHER-ORDER SPATIAL STRUCTURES FROM VISUAL SCENES , 2022 .

[53]  R. Connor Dolphin social intelligence: complex alliance relationships in bottlenose dolphins and a consideration of selective environments for extreme brain size evolution in mammals , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  P. Greenfield,et al.  Language, tools and brain: The ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior , 1991, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[55]  B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Species differences in the identification of acoustic stimuli by birds , 2008, Behavioural Processes.

[56]  Esther Mondragón,et al.  Rule Learning by Rats , 2008, Science.

[57]  W. Fitch,et al.  Computational Constraints on Syntactic Processing in a Nonhuman Primate , 2004, Science.

[58]  J. Jonides,et al.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  L. Rogers,et al.  Bilaterally projecting neurons in the two visual pathways of chicks , 1998, Brain Research.

[60]  A. Montagu Time, Morphology, and Neoteny in the Evolution of Man* , 1955 .

[61]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults , 1999, Cognition.

[62]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus jacchus) spatial memory in a foraging task: win-stay versus win-shift strategies. , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[63]  Alberto Testolin,et al.  Probabilistic Models and Generative Neural Networks: Towards an Unified Framework for Modeling Normal and Impaired Neurocognitive Functions , 2016, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[64]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[65]  R. Byrne,et al.  The alarm call system of wild black-fronted titi monkeys, Callicebus nigrifrons , 2012, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[66]  K. Okanoya The Bengalese Finch: A Window on the Behavioral Neurobiology of Birdsong Syntax , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[67]  E. Menzel,et al.  Social foraging in marmoset monkeys and the question of intelligence , 1985 .

[68]  R. C. Miles,et al.  Delayed-response learning in the marmoset and the macaque. , 1957, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[69]  Aaron Sloman,et al.  The Altricial-Precocial Spectrum for Robots , 2005, IJCAI.

[70]  Florent Meyniel,et al.  The Neural Representation of Sequences: From Transition Probabilities to Algebraic Patterns and Linguistic Trees , 2015, Neuron.

[71]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Learning to Learn: Infants’ Acquisition of Stress-Based Strategies for Word Segmentation , 2007 .

[72]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  A comparative study of the behavioral deficits following lesions of various parts of the zebra finch song system: implications for vocal learning , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[73]  J. M. Toro,et al.  The use of interval ratios in consonance perception by rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans (Homo sapiens). , 2015, Journal of comparative psychology.

[74]  E. Newport,et al.  Computation of Conditional Probability Statistics by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .

[75]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism , 2002, Cognition.

[76]  K. Lorenz The Companion in the Bird's World , 1937 .

[77]  Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus jacchus) spatial memory in a foraging task: win-stay versus win-shift strategies. , 1994 .

[78]  Dima Amso,et al.  Across space and time: infants learn from backward and forward visual statistics. , 2017, Developmental science.

[79]  G Turkewitz,et al.  Limitations on input as a basis for neural organization and perceptual development: a preliminary theoretical statement. , 1982, Developmental psychobiology.

[80]  J. Atkinson,et al.  Development of human visual function , 2011, Vision Research.

[81]  Jodie A. Baird,et al.  Infants parse dynamic action. , 2001, Child development.

[82]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Statistical language learning in neonates revealed by event-related brain potentials , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[83]  D R MEYER,et al.  Learning sets in marmosets. , 1956, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[84]  Carel ten Cate,et al.  Rule learning by zebra finches in an artificial grammar learning task: which rule? , 2012, Animal Cognition.

[85]  P. Berkes,et al.  Statistically Optimal Perception and Learning: from Behavior to Neural Representations , 2022 .

[86]  Kentaro Abe,et al.  Songbirds possess the spontaneous ability to discriminate syntactic rules , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[87]  J. Lilly Vocal Mimicry in Tursiops: Ability to Match Numbers and Durations of Human Vocal Bursts , 1965, Science.

[88]  Joël Fagot,et al.  The Temporal Dynamics of Regularity Extraction in Non-Human Primates , 2016, Cogn. Sci..

[89]  K. Okanoya,et al.  Statistical and Prosodic Cues for Song Segmentation Learning by Bengalese Finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica) , 2010 .

[90]  Kazuo Okanoya,et al.  Acoustical and Syntactical Comparisons between Songs of the White-backed Munia (Lonchura striata) and Its Domesticated Strain, the Bengalese Finch (Lonchura striata var. domestica) , 1999 .

[91]  LouAnn Gerken,et al.  From domain-generality to domain-sensitivity: 4-Month-olds learn an abstract repetition rule in music that 7-month-olds do not , 2009, Cognition.

[92]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Location, location, location: development of spatiotemporal sequence learning in infancy. , 2007, Child development.

[93]  E. Jarvis Selection for and against vocal learning in birds and mammals , 2006 .

[94]  Katrina L Schmid,et al.  Assessment of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in the chick using an optokinetic nystagmus paradigm , 1998, Vision Research.

[95]  Julia L. Evans,et al.  Can Infants Map Meaning to Newly Segmented Words? , 2007, Psychological science.

[96]  J. Saffran Constraints on Statistical Language Learning , 2002 .

[97]  Justin N. Wood Newborn chickens generate invariant object representations at the onset of visual object experience , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[98]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  The evolution of language from social cognition , 2014, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[99]  M. Hauser,et al.  Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins , 2001, Cognition.

[100]  S. Rose God's organism? The chick as a model system for memory studies. , 2000, Learning & memory.

[101]  Stuart Marcovitch,et al.  Sequence learning in infancy: the independent contributions of conditional probability and pair frequency information. , 2009, Developmental science.

[102]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Phonotactic and Prosodic Effects on Word Segmentation in Infants , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[103]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants , 2001, Cognition.

[104]  Carel Ten Cate,et al.  Budgerigars and zebra finches differ in how they generalize in an artificial grammar learning experiment , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[105]  S. Edelman,et al.  Juvenile zebra finches learn the underlying structural regularities of their fathers’ song , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[106]  R. Aslin,et al.  Encoding multielement scenes: statistical learning of visual feature hierarchies. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[107]  A. Rey,et al.  Centre-embedded structures are a by-product of associative learning and working memory constraints: Evidence from baboons (Papio Papio) , 2012, Cognition.

[108]  P. Garber,et al.  Role of spatial memory in primate foraging patterns: Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis , 1989, American journal of primatology.

[109]  Erik D. Thiessen Effects of Inter- and Intra-modal Redundancy on Infants' Rule Learning , 2012 .

[110]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Abstract Rule Learning for Visual Sequences in 8- and 11-Month-Olds. , 2009, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[111]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Patterns of Development : The Altricial-Precocial Spectrum , 2000 .

[112]  Patricia M. Greenfield,et al.  Does everybody do it? Hierarchically organized sequential activity in robots, birds and monkeys , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[113]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Infants' statistical learning: 2- and 5-month-olds' segmentation of continuous visual sequences. , 2015, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[114]  Yukiko Kikuchi,et al.  Auditory Artificial Grammar Learning in Macaque and Marmoset Monkeys , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[115]  Carel ten Cate,et al.  Artificial grammar learning in zebra finches and human adults: XYX versus XXY , 2014, Animal Cognition.

[116]  Kenny Smith,et al.  Mixed‐complexity artificial grammar learning in humans and macaque monkeys: evaluating learning strategies , 2015, The European journal of neuroscience.

[117]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Spontaneous generalization of abstract multimodal patterns in young domestic chicks , 2017, Animal Cognition.

[118]  J. Saffran The Use of Predictive Dependencies in Language Learning , 2001 .

[119]  Generalization of visual regularities in newly hatched chicks (Gallus gallus) , 2016, Animal Cognition.

[120]  Vincent M. Janik,et al.  Chapter 4 Acoustic Communication in Delphinids , 2009 .

[121]  J. M. Toro,et al.  Rule learning over consonants and vowels in a non-human animal , 2013, Cognition.

[122]  James M. Rehg,et al.  Real-world visual statistics and infants' first-learned object names , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[123]  Jordan A. Comins,et al.  Perceptual categories enable pattern generalization in songbirds , 2013, Cognition.

[124]  C. Petkov,et al.  Birds, primates, and spoken language origins: behavioral phenotypes and neurobiological substrates , 2012, Front. Evol. Neurosci..

[125]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Infant Rule Learning Facilitated by Speech , 2007, Psychological science.