Alonzo Church's Contributions to Philosophy and Intensional Logic

§0 . Alonzo Church's contributions to philosophy and to that most philosophical part of logic, intensional logic, are impressive indeed. He wrote relatively few papers actually devoted to specifically philosophical issues, as distinguished from related technical work in logic. Many of his contributions appear in reviews for The Journal of Symbolic Logic , and it can hardly be maintained that one finds there a “philosophical system”. But there occur a clearly articulated and powerful methodology, terse arguments, often of “crushing cogency”, and philosophical observations of the first importance. Many of the less formal philosophical contributions center around questions concerning meaning, but there are important clarifications and insights into matters of the epistemology and ontology of the sciences, especially the formal sciences. 1.1. The logistic method . Church's writings on philosophical matters exhibit an unwavering commitment to what he called the “logistic method”. The term did not catch on and now one would just speak of “formalization”. The use of these ideas is now so common and familiar among logicians and logically-oriented philosophers that they are simply taken for granted. But they deserve to be celebrated and re-emphasized, for there are (still) philosophers who seriously underestimate and even consciously reject these techniques.

[1]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap , 1966 .

[2]  Alonzo Church,et al.  Carnap's Introduction to Semantics , 1943 .

[3]  Charles D. Parsons,et al.  Intensional logic in extensional language , 1982, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[4]  Virgil C. Aldrich,et al.  The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell , 1945 .

[5]  A. Church Principia: Volumes II and III , 1928 .

[6]  Nathan Salmón Being of two minds : belief with doubt , 1995 .

[7]  Alonzo Church,et al.  A Revised Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation. Alternative (1) , 1993 .

[8]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  From a Logical Point of View , 1955 .

[9]  Alonzo Church,et al.  Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Part I , 1944 .

[10]  N. Goodman On Some Differences About Meaning , 1953 .

[11]  N. Goodman On Likeness of Meaning , 1949 .

[12]  S. Blackburn,et al.  Meaning and Use , 1979 .

[13]  J. Hintikka Significance and Analyticity: A Comment on Some Recent Proposals of Carnap , 1975 .

[14]  Some Difficulties Concerning Russellian Intensional Logic , 1986 .

[15]  Alonzo Church,et al.  Introduction to Mathematical Logic , 1991 .

[16]  S. D. Chatterji Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians , 1995 .

[17]  A. Church On Carnap's Analysis of Statements of Assertion and Belief , 1950 .

[18]  Horace M. Kallen,et al.  Structure, Method and Meaning , 1952 .

[19]  R. Carnap Logical Syntax of Language , 1937 .

[20]  B. Rundle Review: J. Myhill, Problems Arising in the Formalization of Intensional Logic , 1972 .

[21]  Howard K. Wettstein,et al.  Themes from Kaplan , 1989 .

[22]  Method in Philosophical Psychology (From the Banal to the Bizarre) , 1974 .

[23]  Saul A. Kripke,et al.  A Puzzle about Belief , 1979 .

[24]  Alonzo Church,et al.  Intensional isomorphism and identity of belief , 1954 .

[25]  Alonzo Church,et al.  A Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation , 1952 .

[26]  C. Anthony Anderson,et al.  Some New Axioms for the Logic of Sense and Denotation: Alternative (0) , 1980 .

[27]  Nelson Goodman,et al.  The Problem of Universals. A Symposium , 1961 .

[28]  D. Davidson,et al.  The Structure and Content of Truth , 1990 .

[29]  R. H.,et al.  The Principles of Mathematics , 1903, Nature.

[30]  B. Russell II.—On Denoting , 1905 .

[31]  A. Church Outline of a Revised Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation (Part II) , 1973 .

[32]  P. French,et al.  Contemporary perspectives in the philosophy of language , 1989 .

[33]  Rudolf Carnap,et al.  Meaning and Necessity , 1947 .

[34]  A. J. Ayer,et al.  Language, Truth, and Logic , 1936 .

[35]  Alonzo Church,et al.  The Need for Abstract Entities in Semantic Analysis , 1951 .

[36]  A. Tarski,et al.  Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress , 1962 .

[37]  Oswald Hanfling,et al.  Ayer, Language, Truth and Logic , 1986, Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series.

[38]  A. R. Turquette,et al.  Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics , 1957 .

[39]  A. Church A Set of Postulates for the Foundation of Logic , 1932 .

[40]  John G. Kemeny A New Approach to Semantics-Part I , 1956, J. Symb. Log..

[41]  Alonzo Church,et al.  A formulation of the simple theory of types , 1940, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[42]  Dagobert D. Runes The Dictionary Of Philosophy , 1951 .

[43]  H. Putnam Synonymity, and the Analysis of Belief Sentences , 1954 .

[44]  K. Gödel Philosophy of mathematics: Russell's mathematical logic , 1984 .

[45]  John G. Kemeny A New Approach to Semantics-Part II , 1956, J. Symb. Log..

[46]  W. Quine The two dogmas of empiricism , 1951 .

[47]  A. Church The calculi of lambda-conversion , 1941 .

[48]  N. Goodman Problems and projects , 1979 .

[49]  David Kaplan,et al.  How to Russell a Frege-Church , 1975 .

[50]  H. Feigl,et al.  The foundations of science and the concepts of psychology and psychoanalysis , 1958 .