Sustainable design of rural roads with 2+1 road design: Levels of service and traffic flow performance

This paper provides research results of a study to assess the driver performance levels of a 2+1 road, a special type of road involving intermediate cross section that is applied where a four-lane roadway construction is unjustifiable and the use of a two-lane road design may not provide the desired level of mobility. Despite increased driver safety, the use of the 2+1 road involves a problem that the South Korean government cannot assess the mobility effects of 2+1 roads, because the current Korean Highway Capacity Manual lacks the level of service procedure for 2+1 roads. Hence, research is required to provide potential measures of effectiveness for describing traffic flows in 2+1 roads and establish a reliable level of service analysis procedure. To address this issue, we applied the following approach: (1) existing research concerning 2+1 road design and flow performance was reviewed; (2) a field study was conducted in 2+1 roads with video cameras and traffic detectors to investigate traffic flow conditions; (3) candidate measures of effectiveness for describing traffic flow in 2+1 roads were identified based on field study results as well as TWOPAS simulation efforts; and (4) an analysis procedure applicable to determine levels of traffic flow service for 2+1 roads was proposed. We also examined how our proposed procedure would perform based on a case study. It was found that the percent time spent following would represent the most appropriate measures of effectiveness and that realistic output may be produced with our proposed procedure.

[1]  Torsten Bergh,et al.  Country Report Sweden , 1998 .

[2]  John Smart Country Report - United Kingdom , 2010 .

[3]  Alfredo Garcia,et al.  Procedures to Facilitate Passing on Conventional Highways by Means of Simulation , 2010 .

[4]  Richard Tay,et al.  Effects of changing highway design speed , 2013 .

[5]  Arne Carlsson,et al.  2+1-roads with and without cable barriers: speed performance , 2000 .

[6]  John Smart,et al.  Wide Single 2+1 Carriageways in the UK , 2005 .

[7]  R T Luttinen Percent Time-Spent-Following as Performance Measure for Two-Lane Highways , 2001 .

[8]  Jaisung Choi,et al.  Roadside walking environments and major factors affecting pedestrian level of service , 2013 .

[9]  T E Hofbauer Country Report: Update on Geometric Design Activities in Austria , 2010 .

[10]  Arne Carlsson,et al.  2+1 Roads with Cable Barriers--A Swedish Success Story , 2005 .

[11]  Suk Ki Lee,et al.  Operational Analysis of 2+1 Roadway and its Use in Developing Geometric Design Standards in S. Korea , 2010 .

[12]  J.H.R. van Duin,et al.  City logistics through the canals? A simulation study on freight waterborne transport in the inner-city of Amsterdam , 2014 .

[13]  Piotr Szagała Analysis of 2+1 Roadway Design Alternatives , 2005 .

[14]  C J Hoban Planning and design for rural roads: observations on a year in America , 1986 .

[15]  A R Archilla,et al.  TWOPAS model improvements , 1998 .

[16]  Jaisung Choi,et al.  Determination of accident modification factors for the median bus lanes on urban arterials , 2012 .

[17]  Marcus A Brewer,et al.  Operational Characteristics of Super 2 Highways in Texas , 2011 .

[18]  Arne Carlsson Evaluation of 2+1 roads with cable barriers , 2009 .

[19]  Mats Wiklund,et al.  Effects of desired speeds for queuing and delay on single-lane road segments , 2015 .

[20]  KimSangyoup,et al.  Effects of preceding geometric conditions on operating speed consistency of multilane highways , 2013 .

[21]  Torsten Bergh,et al.  Roadside Area Design – Swedish and Scandinavian Experience , 2010 .

[22]  Caroline Sawyer,et al.  Country report : United Kingdom , 2014 .