‘Putting in the graft’ to optimize outcomes in nasal alar reconstruction

1 Augustin M. Pharmacoeconomics of occupational diseases. In: Kanerva’s Occupational Dermatology (Rustemeyer T, Elsner P, John SM, Maibach HI, eds), 2nd edn, vol. I. Berlin: Springer, 2012; 16–26. 2 Diepgen TL. Occupational skin-disease data in Europe. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2003; 76:331–8. 3 Macan J, Rimac D, Ke zi c S, Varnai VM. Occupational and nonoccupational allergic contact dermatitis: a follow-up study. Dermatology 2013; 227:321–9. 4 Clemmensen KBC, Carøe TK, Thomsen SF et al. Two-year followup survey of patients with allergic contact dermatitis from an occupational cohort. Is the prognosis dependent on the omnipresence of the allergen? Br J Dermatol 2014; 170:1100–105. 5 Carøe TK, Ebbehøj N, Agner T. A survey of exposures related to recognized occupational contact dermatitis in Denmark in 2010. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70:56–62. 6 Meding B, Lanetto R, Lindahl G et al. Occupational skin disease in Sweden – a 12 year follow-up. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 53:308–13. 7 Geier J, Krautheim A, Uter W et al. Occupational contact allergy in the building trade in Germany: influence of preventive measures and changing exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2011; 84: 403–11. 8 Uter W, Geier J, Lessmann H, Schnuch A. Is contact allergy to glyceryl monothioglycolate still a problem in Germany? Contact Dermatitis 2006; 55:54–6. 9 Allmers H, Schmengler J, John SM. Decreasing incidence of occupational contact urticaria caused by natural rubber latex allergy in German health care workers. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 114: 347–51. 10 Bauer A. Contact dermatitis in the cleaning industry. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2013; 13:521–4. 11 Geier J, Lessmann H, Mahler V et al. Occupational contact allergy caused by rubber gloves – nothing has changed. Contact Dermatitis 2012; 67:149–56.