Quantification of the Young's modulus of the primary plant cell wall using Bending-Lab-On-Chip (BLOC).

Biomechanical and mathematical modeling of plant developmental processes requires quantitative information about the structural and mechanical properties of living cells, tissues and cellular components. A crucial mechanical property of plant cells is the mechanical stiffness or Young's modulus of its cell wall. Measuring this property in situ at single cell wall level is technically challenging. Here, a bending test is implemented in a chip, called Bending-Lab-On-a-Chip (BLOC), to quantify this biomechanical property for a widely investigated cellular model system, the pollen tube. Pollen along with culture medium is introduced into a microfluidic chip and the growing pollen tube is exposed to a bending force created through fluid loading. The flexural rigidity of the pollen tube and the Young's modulus of the cell wall are estimated through finite element modeling of the observed fluid-structure interaction. An average value of 350 MPa was experimentally estimated for the Young's modulus in longitudinal direction of the cell wall of Camellia pollen tubes. This value is in agreement with the result of an independent method based on cellular shrinkage after plasmolysis and with the mechanical properties of in vitro reconstituted cellulose-callose material.

[1]  L. Taiz,et al.  Plant Cell Expansion: Regulation of Cell Wall Mechanical Properties , 1984 .

[2]  D J Cosgrove,et al.  Wall extensibility: its nature, measurement and relationship to plant cell growth. , 1993, The New phytologist.

[3]  A MICRO‐PENETRATION TECHNIQUE FOR MECHANICAL TESTING OF PLANT CELL WALLS , 1996 .

[4]  H. Endress,et al.  Rheological methods to characterize pectins in solutions and gels , 1996 .

[5]  A. D. Tomos,et al.  THE PRESSURE PROBE: A Versatile Tool in Plant Cell Physiology. , 1999, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology.

[6]  D. F. Steele,et al.  The mechanical properties of compacts of microcrystalline cellulose and silicified microcrystalline cellulose. , 2000, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[7]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Laminar flows: Subcellular positioning of small molecules , 2001, Nature.

[8]  George Jeronimidis,et al.  Mechanical properties of primary plant cell wall analogues , 2002, Planta.

[9]  Anja Geitmann,et al.  The local cytomechanical properties of growing pollen tubes correspond to the axial distribution of structural cellular elements , 2004, Sexual Plant Reproduction.

[10]  Marileen Dogterom,et al.  A bending mode analysis for growing microtubules: evidence for a velocity-dependent rigidity. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[11]  A. Geitmann,et al.  Pectin and the role of the physical properties of the cell wall in pollen tube growth of Solanum chacoense , 2005, Planta.

[12]  Jenny Blewett,et al.  A micromanipulation method to measure the mechanical properties of single tomato suspension cells , 2004, Biotechnology Letters.

[13]  P. Lintilhac,et al.  Loss of stability, pH, and the anisotropic extensibility of Chara cell walls , 2006, Planta.

[14]  N. Nakamura,et al.  Immunocytochemical localization of callose in the germinated pollen ofCamellia japonica , 1996, Protoplasma.

[15]  R. Benkert,et al.  The turgor pressure of growing lily pollen tubes , 1997, Protoplasma.

[16]  A. Geitmann,et al.  More Than a Leak Sealant. The Mechanical Properties of Callose in Pollen Tubes1 , 2005, Plant Physiology.

[17]  T. Baskin.  Anisotropic expansion of the plant cell wall. , 2005, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[18]  Mark R Marten,et al.  Elastic Properties of the Cell Wall of Aspergillus nidulans Studied with Atomic Force Microscopy , 2008, Biotechnology progress.

[19]  D. Cosgrove.  Growth of the plant cell wall , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[20]  Lan Wang,et al.  Comparison of plant cell turgor pressure measurement by pressure probe and micromanipulation , 2006, Biotechnology Letters.

[21]  Rui Malhó,et al.  The pollen tube : a cellular and molecular perspective , 2006 .

[22]  P. Renaud,et al.  BioMEMS for medicine: On-chip cell characterization and implantable microelectrodes , 2006 .

[23]  A. Geitmann.  Plant and fungal cytomechanics: quantifying and modeling cellular architecture 1 , 2006 .

[24]  Anja Geitmann,et al.  Experimental approaches used to quantify physical parameters at cellular and subcellular levels. , 2006, American journal of botany.

[25]  C-E Aubin,et al.  Finite-Element Analysis of Geometrical Factors in Micro-Indentation of Pollen Tubes , 2006, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[26]  Frank Vollmer,et al.  Microfluidic flow rate detection based on integrated optical fiber cantilever. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[27]  P. Lintilhac,et al.  Loss of Stability: A New Look at the Physics of Cell Wall Behavior during Plant Cell Growth[W][OA] , 2007, Plant Physiology.

[28]  Cornie Scheffer,et al.  BioMEMS in Diagnostics: A Review and Recent Developments , 2008 .

[29]  A. Cheung,et al.  Structural and signaling networks for the polar cell growth machinery in pollen tubes. , 2008, Annual review of plant biology.

[30]  R. Siegel,et al.  BioMEMS devices for drug delivery , 2009, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[31]  A. Geitmann,et al.  Mechanics and modeling of plant cell growth. , 2009, Trends in plant science.

[32]  A. Geitmann,et al.  Polar growth in pollen tubes is associated with spatially confined dynamic changes in cell mechanical properties. , 2009, Developmental biology.

[33]  Y. Chebli,et al.  Morphogenesis of complex plant cell shapes: the mechanical role of crystalline cellulose in growing pollen tubes , 2010, Sexual Plant Reproduction.

[34]  Anja Geitmann,et al.  Mechanical modeling and structural analysis of the primary plant cell wall. , 2010, Current opinion in plant biology.

[35]  Pierre Fayant,et al.  Finite Element Model of Polar Growth in Pollen Tubes[C][W] , 2010, Plant Cell.

[36]  A. Geitmann,et al.  Modeling pollen tube growth: Feeling the pressure to deliver testifiable predictions , 2011, Plant signaling & behavior.

[37]  Bart Nicolai,et al.  A finite element model for mechanical deformation of single tomato suspension cells , 2011 .

[38]  S. Quake,et al.  The RootChip: An Integrated Microfluidic Chip for Plant Science[W][OA] , 2011, Plant Cell.

[39]  Anja Geitmann,et al.  The Cell Wall of the Arabidopsis Pollen Tube—Spatial Distribution, Recycling, and Network Formation of Polysaccharides1[C][W][OA] , 2012, Plant Physiology.

[40]  Cris Kuhlemeier,et al.  Cellular Force Microscopy for in Vivo Measurements of Plant Tissue Mechanics1[W][OA] , 2012, Plant Physiology.

[41]  Anja Geitmann,et al.  Pollen tube growth: Getting a grip on cell biology through modeling , 2012 .

[42]  Ueli Grossniklaus,et al.  The pollen tube: a soft shell with a hard core. , 2013, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[43]  M. Packirisamy,et al.  TipChip: a modular, MEMS-based platform for experimentation and phenotyping of tip-growing cells. , 2013, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.