Cohesion, Structural Equivalence, and Similarity of Behavior: An Approach to the Study of Corporate Political Power

Political sociologists interested in corporate power have focused increasingly on the extent to which the business community is cohesive. Studies of cohesion, however, frequently contain either no definition or operational definitions with little theoretical rationale. This paper examines the uses of the term cohesion in the power structure literature as well as in classical and contemporary sociological theory. I argue that: (1) cohesion is most appropriately defined as an objective characteristic of a social structure; (2) to understand a group's power, we shouldfocus on the extent to which its members behave similarly; and (3) the concept of structural equivalence may be as likely to capture the processes of interest to power structure researchers as the concept of cohesion. Findings from a study of corporate political behavior are presented to illustrate this argument.

[1]  M. Gallagher,et al.  The Civic Involvement of Bankers: An Analysis of the Influence of Economic Power and Social Prominence in the Command of Civic Policy Positions , 1979 .

[2]  T. Parsons The Social System , 1953 .

[3]  M. Mizruchi,et al.  The American Corporate Network 1904-1974 , 1982 .

[4]  A. Neustadtl,et al.  Corporate Political Groupings: Does Ideology Unify Business Political Behavior? , 1988 .

[5]  T. Skocpol,et al.  The Dead End of Matatheory@@@Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. , 1985 .

[6]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Cohesion Versus Structural Equivalence as a Basis for Network Subgroups , 1978 .

[7]  R. Alba,et al.  Elite Social Circles , 1978 .

[8]  R. Williams,et al.  American Society: A Sociological Interpretation, , 1970 .

[9]  William A. Gamson,et al.  Utilitarian Logic in the Resource Mobilization Perspective , 1977 .

[10]  N. Polsby,et al.  How to Study Community Power: The Pluralist Alternative , 1960, The Journal of Politics.

[11]  D. S. Glasberg CORPORATE POWER AND CONTROL: THE CASE OF LEASCO CORPORATION VERSUS CHEMICAL BANK* , 1981 .

[12]  D. Esty,et al.  MARKET STRUCTURE AND POLITICAL INFLUENCE: NEW DATA ON POLITICAL EXPENDITURES, ACTIVITY, AND SUCCESS , 1983 .

[13]  Larry Sabato,et al.  Pac Power: Inside the World of Political Action Committees , 1985 .

[14]  Business and Society , 1978 .

[15]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  The Ties That Bind: Organizational and Class Bases of Stability in a Corporate Interlock Network , 1986 .

[16]  D. Bell The End of Ideology , 1960 .

[17]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Interorganization Contagion in Corporate Philanthropy , 1991 .

[18]  G. Moore,et al.  The Structure of a National Elite Network , 1979, Power in Modern Societies.

[19]  N. Poulantzas Classes in Contemporary Capitalism , 1977 .

[20]  A. Rose,et al.  The Power Structure. , 1968 .

[21]  C. Mills,et al.  The Theory of Social and Economic Organization , 1948 .

[22]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Structural Cohesion and Equivalence Explanations of Social Homogeneity , 1984 .

[23]  David Halberstam,et al.  The Powers That Be , 2005 .

[24]  Maurice Zeitlin,et al.  Corporate Ownership and Control: The Large Corporation and the Capitalist Class , 1974, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[26]  Ivone Kirkpatrick,et al.  The inner circle : memoirs , 1959 .

[27]  A. Stein,et al.  Conflict and Cohesion , 1976 .

[28]  D. Sciulli Theory of Societal Constitutionalism: Foundations of a Non-Marxist Critical Theory , 1991 .

[29]  G. Simmel,et al.  Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations , 1955 .

[30]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  I. Pool,et al.  American Business and Public Policy: The Politics of Foreign Trade , 1972 .

[32]  H. White,et al.  “Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[33]  D. Jacobs BUSINESS RESOURCES AND TAXATION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMIC ORGANIZATION AND PUBLIC POLICY , 1987 .

[34]  D. Riesman,et al.  The Lonely Crowd. , 1951 .

[35]  Dan Clawson,et al.  Interlocks, PACs, and Corporate Conservatism , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  D. Clawson,et al.  The Logic of Business Unity: Corporate Contributions to the 1980 Congressional Elections , 1986 .

[37]  M. Hannan,et al.  Estimation in Panel Models: Results in Pooling Cross-Sections and Time Series , 1977 .

[38]  Michael Schwartz,et al.  The Power Structure of American Business. , 1986 .

[39]  C. Offe,et al.  Political Authority and Class Structures – An Analysis of Late Capitalist Societies , 1972 .

[40]  R. Merton The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action , 1936 .

[41]  C. Mills,et al.  Power Elite , 1956, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[42]  Floyd Hunter,et al.  Community Power Structure , 1954 .

[43]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[44]  James O’Connor,et al.  The fiscal crisis of the state , 1973 .

[45]  Charles Kadushin,et al.  Power, Influence and Social Circles: A New Methodology for Studying Opinion Makers , 1968 .

[46]  S. Lukes Power: A Radical View , 1974 .

[47]  R. Ratcliff Banks and Corporate Lending: An Analysis of the Impact of the Internal Structure of the Capitalist Class on The Lending Behavior of Banks , 1980 .

[48]  G. William Domhoff,et al.  Who Rules America? , 2021 .

[49]  H. Gerth,et al.  The Sociology of Georg Simmel. , 1950 .

[50]  R. Miliband,et al.  The state in capitalist society , 1969 .

[51]  Henry Teune,et al.  A Rationalist Methodology for the Social Sciences , 1985 .

[52]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  The Influence of Corporate Power, Social Status, and Market Position on Corporate Interlocks in a Regional Network , 1985 .

[53]  S. Boorman,et al.  Social Structure from Multiple Networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions , 1976, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  M. Abrahamson,et al.  Principles of Group Solidarity. , 1988 .

[55]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Intercorporate Relations: A resource dependence perspective on intercorporate relations , 1988 .