Experimental design-based optimization strategies for chromatographic and capillary electrophoretic separations

Abstract To develop and optimize separations in chromatography and capillary electrophoresis (CE), different approaches are possible. Some of them (univariate, simplex and experimental design approaches) are reviewed in this chapter. During these optimizations, the factors affecting most the selectivity, i.e., the sequence in which compounds elute, are most interesting to study. In reversed-phase chromatography, for instance, these are the type of stationary phase, the mobile phase pH, the organic modifier content and the modifier composition, and to a lesser extent, some other factors, such as, for instance, gradient slope or analysis temperature. Not all factors can be optimized in one experimental setup and often a sequential approach is defined, in which in certain steps experimental designs may be applied. This chapter discusses the most common experimental designs (screening designs, response surface designs and mixture designs) applicable not only in different steps of the optimization procedure for chromatographic and electrophoretic methods but also in many other optimizations. The application of screening designs in given method validation items, such as robustness testing, is also considered. Design properties are discussed as well as the data treatment involved. Different types of screening designs (full and fractional factorial designs, Plackett–Burman designs) and the different steps in their application are addressed. The most common symmetric and nonsymmetric response surface designs are also dealt with. Finally, the transfer of CE methods after their development is also shortly addressed because these methods are much less robust than chromatographic.

[1]  Peter J. Schoenmakers,et al.  Criteria for optimizing the separation of target analytes in complex chromatograms , 1996 .

[2]  Y. Vander Heyden,et al.  Precision evaluation of chiral capillary electrophoretic methods in the context of inter-instrumental transfer: constant current versus constant voltage application. , 2014, Journal of chromatography. A.

[3]  Lloyd R. Snyder,et al.  Practical HPLC method development , 1988 .

[4]  Y. Vander Heyden,et al.  Interinstrumental method transfer of a capillary electrophoretic separation of angiotensin II and five derivatives: Evaluation and update of earlier developed guidelines , 2015, Electrophoresis.

[5]  Y. Vander Heyden,et al.  Interinstrumental Transfer of a Chiral Capillary Electrophoretic Method: The Use of Robustness Test Information to Overcome Differences in Detector and Data-Handling Specifications , 2018, Chromatographia.

[6]  D. Massart,et al.  Half-fraction and full factorial designs versus central composite design for retention modelling in reversed-phase ion-pair liquid chromatography. , 1996, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[7]  D. Massart,et al.  Determination of amiodarone and desethylamiodarone in plasma with a standardised extraction and chromatographic optimisation procedure. , 1988, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[8]  R. Plackett,et al.  THE DESIGN OF OPTIMUM MULTIFACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS , 1946 .

[9]  Y. Vander Heyden,et al.  Inter-instrumental method transfer of chiral capillary electrophoretic methods using robustness test information. , 2014, Journal of chromatography. A.

[10]  D L Massart,et al.  Development and optimisation of a flow injection assay for fluticasone propionate using an asymmetrical design and the variable-size simplex algorithm. , 2000, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[11]  R. Lenth Quick and easy analysis of unreplicated factorials , 1989 .

[12]  Desire L. Massart,et al.  Determination of system suitability limits with a robustness test , 1999 .

[13]  Peter J. Schoenmakers,et al.  Optimization of Chromatographic Selectivity: A Guide to Method Development , 2021 .

[14]  Y. Heyden,et al.  Guidance for robustness/ruggedness tests in method validation. , 2001, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[15]  Desire L. Massart,et al.  Three-level screening designs for the optimisation or the ruggedness testing of analytical procedures , 1993 .

[16]  John I. McCool Methods for Experimental Design: Principles and Applications for Physicists and Chemists , 2012 .

[17]  D. L. Massart,et al.  Optimization of the separation of (6R)- and (6S)- leucovorin and evaluation of the robustness of the optimum , 1992 .

[18]  Desire L. Massart,et al.  Influence of the sequence of experiments in a ruggedness test when drift occurs , 1997 .