Measuring Viscoelastic Properties of Living Cells

Precise measurement of mechanical properties of living cells is important in understanding their mechanics-biology relations. In this study, we adopted the atomic force microscope to measure the creep deformation and stress relaxation of six different human cell lines. We examined whether the measured creep and relaxation trajectories satisfy a verification relation derived based on the linear viscoelastic theory. We compared the traditional spring-dashpot and the newly developed power-law-type constitutive relations in fitting the experimental measurements. We found that the human normal liver (L02), hepatic cancer (HepG2), hepatic stellate (LX2) and gastric cancer (NCI-N87) cell lines are linear viscoelastic materials, and human normal gastric (GES-1) and gastric cancer (SGC7901) cell lines are nonlinear due to failing in satisfying the verification relation for linear viscoelastic theory. The three-parameter power-law-type constitutive relation can fit the experimental measurements better than that of the five-parameter classical spring-dashpot.

[1]  Manfred Radmacher,et al.  Comparison of mechanical properties of normal and malignant thyroid cells. , 2012, Micron.

[2]  D A Weitz,et al.  Two-point microrheology of inhomogeneous soft materials. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[3]  Jizeng Wang,et al.  Coupled elasticity–diffusion model for the effects of cytoskeleton deformation on cellular uptake of cylindrical nanoparticles , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[4]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Rheology of Living Cells , 2011 .

[5]  Spherical indentation creep following ramp loading , 2005 .

[6]  D. Wirtz,et al.  Mechanics of living cells measured by laser tracking microrheology. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Jizeng Wang,et al.  Power law creep and relaxation with the atomic force microscope: Determining viscoelastic property of living cells , 2019, Science China Technological Sciences.

[8]  C. Lim,et al.  AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. , 2008, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[9]  J. Toca-Herrera,et al.  Stress relaxation and creep on living cells with the atomic force microscope: a means to calculate elastic moduli and viscosities of cell components , 2010, Nanotechnology.

[10]  Huabin Wang,et al.  Role of Capsular Polysaccharides in Biofilm Formation: An AFM Nanomechanics Study. , 2015, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[11]  A. Fuhrmann,et al.  AFM stiffness nanotomography of normal, metaplastic and dysplastic human esophageal cells , 2011, Physical biology.

[12]  R. Christensen,et al.  Chapter I – Viscoelastic Stress Strain Constitutive Relations , 1982 .

[13]  P. Butler,et al.  Substrate stiffness regulates cellular uptake of nanoparticles. , 2013, Nano letters.

[14]  M. Lekka,et al.  Cancer cell recognition--mechanical phenotype. , 2012, Micron.

[15]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Viscoelastic retraction of single living stress fibers and its impact on cell shape, cytoskeletal organization, and extracellular matrix mechanics. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[16]  J. Toca-Herrera,et al.  Stress relaxation microscopy: imaging local stress in cells. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Stefan Schinkinger,et al.  The regulatory role of cell mechanics for migration of differentiating myeloid cells , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  M. P. Kirpichnikov,et al.  Mechanical properties of fibroblasts depend on level of cancer transformation. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[19]  Xi-Qiao Feng,et al.  Geometry independence of the normalized relaxation functions of viscoelastic materials in indentation , 2010 .

[20]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Time scale and other invariants of integrative mechanical behavior in living cells. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  Alexander A Spector,et al.  Emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  En-Jui Lee,et al.  The Contact Problem for Viscoelastic Bodies , 1960 .

[23]  Zbigniew Stachura,et al.  Cancer cell detection in tissue sections using AFM. , 2012, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[24]  G. Lykotrafitis,et al.  Microelasticity of red blood cells in sickle cell disease , 2011 .

[25]  I. Titushkin,et al.  Distinct membrane mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells determined using laser optical tweezers. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[26]  J. Simeon,et al.  Creep function of a single living cell. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[27]  T. Schäffer,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of normal and cancerous human breast cells are affected differently by contact to adjacent cells. , 2017, Acta biomaterialia.

[28]  Takaharu Okajima,et al.  Quantifying cell-to-cell variation in power-law rheology. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Lifetime and strength of adhesive molecular bond clusters between elastic media. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[30]  C. Lim,et al.  Biomechanics approaches to studying human diseases. , 2007, Trends in biotechnology.

[31]  J. Alcaraz,et al.  Measurement of cell microrheology by magnetic twisting cytometry with frequency domain demodulation. , 2001, Journal of applied physiology.

[32]  Jochen Guck,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cell mechanics from the attached to the suspended state. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[33]  Chwee Teck Lim,et al.  Single Cell Mechanics Study of the Human Disease Malaria , 2006 .

[34]  K. Johnson,et al.  Contact Mechanics: Normal contact of inelastic solids , 1985 .

[35]  Youhe Zhou,et al.  Creep effect on cellular uptake of viral particles , 2014 .