The learner characteristics, features of desktop 3D virtual reality environments, and college chemistry instruction: A structural equation modeling analysis

We examined a model of the impact of a 3D desktop virtual reality environment on the learner characteristics (i.e. perceptual and psychological variables) that can enhance chemistry-related learning achievements in an introductory college chemistry class. The relationships between the 3D virtual reality features and the chemistry learning test as it relates to the selected perceptual (spatial orientation and usability) and psychological (self-efficacy and presence) variables were analyzed using the structural equation modeling approach. The results supported all the hypothesized relationships except one. Usability strongly mediated the relationship between 3D virtual reality features, spatial orientation, self-efficacy, and presence. Spatial orientation and self-efficacy had statistically significant, positive impact on the chemistry learning test. The results indicate that 3D virtual reality-based instruction is effective for enhancing students' chemistry achievement. Overall, this study contributed a research model that can help increase the effectiveness of desktop virtual reality environments for enhancing spatial ability and science achievement. Moreover, this study provides insight to science educators, instructional designers, and multimedia developers who are interested in designing science-based instruction using instructional design principles.

[1]  Jorge Trindade,et al.  Science learning in virtual environments: a descriptive study , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[2]  M. Towns,et al.  A Review of Spatial Ability Literature, Its Connection to Chemistry, and Implications for Instruction , 2011 .

[3]  J. Hughes,et al.  Classroom engagement mediates the effect of teacher-student support on elementary students' peer acceptance: A prospective analysis. , 2006, Journal of school psychology.

[4]  Mel Slater,et al.  Using Presence Questionnaires in Reality , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[5]  R. Kline.  Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[6]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  High-School Chemistry Students' Performance and Gender Differences in a Computerized Molecular Modeling Learning Environment , 1999 .

[7]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking: Sex Differences in Visuospatial Abilities: More Than Meets the Eye , 2005 .

[8]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Spatial Ability and its Role in Organic Chemistry: A Study of Four Organic Courses. , 1987 .

[9]  Katerina Mania,et al.  The Effects of Levels of Immersion on Memory and Presence in Virtual Environments: A Reality Centered Approach , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[10]  Renée L. Babcock,et al.  An examination of the factor structure of four of the cognitive abilities included in the educational testing service kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests , 1997 .

[11]  Shaughnessy,et al.  Efficacy Expectations and Vocational Interests as Mediators between Sex and Choice of Math/Science College Majors: A Longitudinal Study , 1996, Journal of vocational behavior.

[12]  R. Clark.  Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[13]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[14]  William Winn,et al.  When Does Immersion in a Virtual Environment Help Students Construct Understanding , 2002 .

[15]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[16]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[17]  J. Gilbert,et al.  Developing Models in Science Education , 2000 .

[18]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[19]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  Visualization in Mathematics, Reading and Science Education , 2010 .

[20]  Barry Harper,et al.  The contribution of 3D environments to conceptual understanding , 2002, ASCILITE.

[21]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[22]  Ellen J. Yezierski,et al.  Misconceptions about the Particulate Nature of Matter. Using Animations To Close the Gender Gap , 2006 .

[23]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[24]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  The role of spatial ability in learning from instructional animations - Evidence for an ability-as-compensator hypothesis , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  J. Steve Oliver,et al.  Influences of attitude toward science, achievement motivation, and science self concept on achievement in science: A longitudinal study , 1988 .

[26]  Michele D. Dickey.  Three-dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: two case studies of Active Worlds as a medium for distance education , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[27]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-Motivation for Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting , 1992, American Educational Research Journal.

[28]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  The role of spatial descriptions in learning from multimedia , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Lynna J. Ausburn,et al.  Desktop Virtual Reality: A Powerful New Technology for Teaching and Research in Industrial Teacher Education. , 2004 .

[30]  Lance Chun Che Fung,et al.  does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural , 2012 .

[31]  R. Mayer,et al.  Learning Science in Virtual Reality Multimedia Environments: Role of Methods and Media , 2002 .

[32]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[33]  James L. Mohler,et al.  Compter Graphics Education: Where and How Do We Develop Spatial Ability? , 2006, Eurographics.

[34]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings , 1996 .

[35]  S. Sorby.  Educational Research in Developing 3‐D Spatial Skills for Engineering Students , 2009 .

[36]  Li-tze Hu,et al.  Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. , 2001 .

[37]  GEORGE M. BODNER,et al.  The Purdue Visualization of Rotations Test , 1997 .

[38]  R. Kozma.  Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate , 1994 .

[39]  David F. Lohman,et al.  Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. , 1988 .

[40]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[41]  Jim X. Chen,et al.  A Model for Understanding How Virtual Reality Aids Complex Conceptual Learning , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[42]  Barry Harper,et al.  3D Environments for Spatial Learning: The Importance of Learning Task design , 2003 .

[43]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[44]  Roy L Simpson,et al.  Welcome to the virtual classroom. How technology is transforming nursing education in the 21st century. , 2003, Nursing administration quarterly.

[45]  Ruth B. Ekstrom,et al.  Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests , 1976 .

[46]  P. Shah,et al.  Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning , 2004 .

[47]  J. Daniel House.  Cognitive-Motivational Predictors of Science Achievement. , 1993 .

[48]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Virtual Reality , 1991 .

[49]  R. Martin.  Measurement and assessment of noise. , 1980 .

[50]  Richard T. Lapan,et al.  Seventh Graders' Vocational Interest and Efficacy Expectation Patterns , 2000 .

[51]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Real and Illusory Interactions Enhance Presence in Virtual Environments , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[52]  Mel Slater,et al.  How Colorful Was Your Day? Why Questionnaires Cannot Assess Presence in Virtual Environments , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[53]  Liesbeth Kester,et al.  Cognitive load theory and multimedia learning, task characteristics and learning engagement: The Current State of the Art , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[54]  Earl Hunt,et al.  The Transfer of Spatial Knowledge in Virtual Environment Training , 1998, Presence.

[55]  B. Thompson.  Foundations of behavioral statistics : an insight-based approach , 2006 .

[56]  David Nunez,et al.  How is presence in non-immersive, non-realistic virtual environments possible? , 2004, AFRIGRAPH '04.

[57]  Mel Slater,et al.  Representations Systems, Perceptual Position, and Presence in Immersive Virtual Environments , 1993, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[58]  Detlef Urhahne,et al.  The Effect of Three-Dimensional Simulations on the Understanding of Chemical Structures and Their Properties , 2009 .

[59]  Elizabeth M. Wenzel,et al.  Localization with non-individualized virtual acoustic display cues , 1991, CHI.

[60]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[61]  James P. Birk,et al.  The role of visualization in learning from computer‐based images , 2005 .

[62]  Paul J. Moore.  Learning and Teaching in Virtual Worlds: Implications of Virtual Reality for Education. , 1995 .

[63]  Hsin-Kai Wu,et al.  The Roles of Multimedia in the Teaching and Learning of the Triplet Relationship in Chemistry , 2009 .

[64]  Shirley Alexander,et al.  Virtual Reality in Education: Defining Researchable Issues , 1994 .

[65]  J. Sweller.  COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[66]  Dennis L. Jackson.  Revisiting Sample Size and Number of Parameter Estimates: Some Support for the N:q Hypothesis , 2003 .

[67]  Melissa L. Burgess.  Optimal experience and reading achievement in virtual environments among college level developmental readers , 2010 .

[68]  G Riva,et al.  Applications of Virtual Environments in Medicine , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[69]  A. Bandura.  Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning , 1993, Educational Psychologist.

[70]  Cecil R. Reynolds,et al.  Measurement and Assessment in Education , 2005 .

[71]  Diane L. Witt-Rose.  Student self-efficacy in college science: an investigation of gender, age, and academic achievement , 2003 .

[72]  Paul Brna,et al.  What is the Value of Virtual Reality for Conceptual Learning? Towards a Theoretical Framework , 1996 .

[73]  Peter Tymms.  Science in Primary Schools: An Investigation into Differences in the Attainment and Attitudes of Pupils across Schools , 1997 .

[74]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[75]  Lynna J. Ausburn,et al.  Effects of Desktop Virtual Reality on Learner Performance and Confidence in Environment Mastery: Opening a Line of Inquiry , 2008 .

[76]  Ming-Chuan Leu,et al.  Virtual Terrorist Attack on the Computer Science Building: Design and Evaluation of a Research Methodology , 2004 .

[77]  Lemonia Antonoglou,et al.  Design, development and implementation of a technology enhanced hybrid course on molecular symmetry: Students' outcomes and attitudes , 2011 .

[78]  J. S. Long,et al.  Tests for Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[79]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.