Assessment of the embodied carbon in precast concrete wall panels using a hybrid life cycle assessment approach in Malaysia

Abstract There is currently growing interest in quantifying the direct and indirect carbon emissions embodied in construction materials and their components production. Previous research shows that indirect emission could be higher than direct emission for energy intensity materials such as cement and steel reinforcement. Quantifying direct emissions alone would underestimate the carbon emissions associated with a material and in turn its environmental impact. The assessment of indirect emissions is a challenging task involving upstream processes of material production. This paper investigates the existing literature on the quantification of embodied carbon by both direct and indirect emissions as well as demonstrating the application of a hybrid life cycle assessment method in building construction. The focus of this paper is the Malaysian context however the principles apply universally. A typical 2-storey residential building has been investigated to determine the total carbon emissions when comparing two construction techniques: conventionally reinforced concrete and precast concrete panels. This paper demonstrates the application of hybrid life cycle assessment by expanding the boundaries of process methods and reducing the sensitivities of I–O life cycle assessment to the raw material price fluctuation for product manufacturing.

[1]  Low Sui Pheng,et al.  Managing the Embodied Carbon of Precast Concrete Columns , 2011 .

[2]  John Holmberg,et al.  Direct and indirect energy use and carbon emissions in the production phase of buildings: An input-output analysis , 2007 .

[3]  George Baird,et al.  Use of a hybrid energy analysis method for evaluating the embodied energy of building materials , 1996 .

[4]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Environmental impact assessment including indirect effects—a case study using input–output analysis , 2003 .

[5]  Abang Abdullah Abang Ali,et al.  Construction performance comparison between conventional and industrialised building systems in Malaysia , 2006 .

[6]  L. Sokka,et al.  Quantifying the total environmental impacts of an industrial symbiosis - a comparison of process-, hybrid and input-output life cycle assessment. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Medgar L. Marceau,et al.  Environmental Life Cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Concrete , 1997 .

[8]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  Clark W. Bullard,et al.  Net energy analysis : handbook for combining process and input-output analysis , 1976 .

[10]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules , 2012 .

[11]  Adolf Acquaye,et al.  Stochastic hybrid embodied CO 2-eq analysis: An application to the Irish apartment building sector , 2011 .

[12]  G. Treloar Extracting Embodied Energy Paths from Input–Output Tables: Towards an Input–Output-based Hybrid Energy Analysis Method , 1997 .

[13]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: A review paper , 2012 .

[14]  Adolf Acquaye,et al.  A Stochastic Hybrid Embodied Energy and CO2_eq Intensity Analysis of Building and Construction Processes in Ireland , 2010 .

[15]  Adolf Acquaye,et al.  Input-output analysis of Irish construction sector greenhouse gas emissions , 2010 .

[16]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[17]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  A comprehensive framework for assessing the life-cycle energy of building construction assemblies , 2010 .

[18]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  A Structure Comparison of two Approaches to LCA Inventory Data, Based on the MIET and ETH Databases (10 pp) , 2005 .

[19]  Jamie Goggins,et al.  The assessment of embodied energy in typical reinforced concrete building structures in Ireland , 2010 .

[20]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Improving the reliability of embodied energy methods for project life‐cycle decision making , 2001 .

[21]  Troy R. Hawkins,et al.  Hybrid Framework for Managing Uncertainty in Life Cycle Inventories , 2009 .

[22]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review , 2010 .

[23]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Comparison of Environmental Effects of Steel- and Concrete-Framed Buildings , 2005 .

[24]  John S. Monahan,et al.  An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: A case study us , 2011 .

[25]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Embodied energy in buildings : wood versus concrete - reply to Börjesson and Gustavsson , 2002 .

[26]  R. Crawford Validation of a hybrid life-cycle inventory analysis method. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.