Design and Evaluation of a Contextual Model for Information Retrieval From Web-Scale Discovery Services to Improve Evidence-Based Practice by Health Care Practitioners: Mixed Methods Study

Background Practicing evidence-based health care is challenging because of overwhelming results presented to practitioners by Google-like Web-scale discovery (WSD) services that index millions of resources while retrieving information based on relevancy algorithms with limited consideration for user information need. Objective On the basis of the user-oriented theory of information need and following design science principles, this study aimed to develop and evaluate an innovative contextual model for information retrieval from WSD services to improve evidence-based practice (EBP) by health care practitioners. Methods We identified problems from literature to support real-world requirements for this study. We used design science research methodology to guide artefact design. We iteratively improved prototype of the context model using artificial formative evaluation. We performed naturalistic summative evaluation using convergent interviewing of health care practitioners and content analysis from a confirmatory focus group consisting of health researchers to evaluate the model’s validity and utility. Results The study iteratively designed and applied the context model to a WSD service to meet 5 identified requirements. All 5 health care practitioners interviewed found the artefact satisfied the 5 requirements to successfully evaluate the model as having validity and utility. Content analysis results from the confirmatory focus group mapped top 5 descriptors per requirement to support a true hypothesis that there is significant discussion among participants to justify concluding that the artefact had validity and utility. Conclusions The context model for WSD satisfied all requirements and was evaluated successfully for information retrieval to improve EBP. Outcomes from this study justify further research into the model.

[1]  Andrew D. Asher,et al.  Paths of Discovery: Comparing the Search Effectiveness of EBSCO Discovery Service, Summon, Google Scholar, and Conventional Library Resources , 2013, Coll. Res. Libr..

[2]  Mohand Boughanem,et al.  Evaluation of contextual information retrieval effectiveness: overview of issues and research , 2010, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[3]  John Mantas,et al.  Health Professionals' Use of Online Information Retrieval Systems and Online Evidence , 2016, MIE.

[4]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Design Science Research Methods and Patterns: Innovating Information and Communication Technology, 2nd Edition , 2007 .

[5]  Matthew B Hoy An Introduction to Web Scale Discovery Systems , 2012, Medical reference services quarterly.

[6]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  FEDS: a Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research , 2016, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Lise Poissant,et al.  Clinicians’ Expectations of Web 2.0 as a Mechanism for Knowledge Transfer of Stroke Best Practices , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  Impact of an Online Medical Internet Site on Knowledge and Practice of Health Care Providers: A Mixed Methods Study of the Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence Project , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[9]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[10]  Convergent interviewing : a qualitative diagnostic technique for researchers , 2008 .

[11]  Dragan Ilic,et al.  Translating Evidence Into Practice via Social Media: A Mixed-Methods Study , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[12]  J. Zell,et al.  Information needs of oncologists, general practitioners and other professionals caring for patients with cancer. , 2016, European journal of cancer care.

[13]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[14]  Shah Jahan Miah,et al.  On-Cloud Healthcare Clinic: An e-health consultancy approach for remote communities in a developing country , 2017, Telematics Informatics.

[15]  Chih-Cheng Hsu,et al.  Comparison of accessing online databases between physicians and nurses in Taiwan , 2012, Informatics for health & social care.

[16]  J. Spross,et al.  Evidence-based practice barriers and facilitators from a continuous quality improvement perspective: an integrative review. , 2011, Journal of nursing management.

[17]  Ann M. Farrell,et al.  Web-Scale Discovery Service: Is It Right for Your Library? Mayo Clinic Libraries Experience , 2016 .

[18]  Rosie Hanneke,et al.  Comparison of three web-scale discovery services for health sciences research. , 2016, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[19]  Shah Jahan Miah,et al.  Healthcare support for underserved communities using a mobile social media platform , 2017, Inf. Syst..

[20]  Darlene Fichter,et al.  Practical Website Improvement Face-Off , 2010 .

[21]  Nan M. Solomons Ms,et al.  Evidence-based practice barriers and facilitators from a continuous quality improvement perspective: an integrative review , 2010 .

[22]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[23]  Shah Jahan Miah,et al.  Extending the framework for mobile health information systems Research: A content analysis , 2017, Inf. Syst..

[24]  Karen Davies Information Needs and Barriers to Accessing Electronic Information: Hospital-Based Physicians Compared to Primary Care Physicians , 2011 .

[25]  D Saparova,et al.  Evaluating a federated medical search engine , 2014, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[26]  Charles Cole,et al.  A theory of information need for information retrieval that connects information to knowledge , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT 1 , 2013 .