Integrating Fuzzy Kano and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Classification of Functional Requirements in National Standardization System

Standardization of information is regarded as one of the three main approaches of supply chains and one of the effective strategies in integrating of their components. One of the most effective standardization systems is utilizing product coding at the national level which creates an appropriate framework for the integrated management of information in the chains. The identification and fulfillment of the customers’ needs (CNs) with the functional requirements (FRs) of this system would satisfy the customers. However, considering the limitation of resources, an appropriate ranking and selection of FRs is of vital importance. In this paper, a new procedure is presented by utilizing fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy KANO techniques aiming at two issues: (i) identifying and classifying CNs, and (ii) ranking and categorizing the FRs. By giving priority to the FRs that increases the beneficiaries’ satisfaction, investment will be more efficient. In order to validate and verify the credibility of the proposed procedure, a case in the commodity and service standardization system of Iran, known as “Iran Code” was employed. The outcomes include ranking and categorizing the present FRs of the system according to the satisfaction, extent and having the more favorable accuracy compared to the existing methods.

[1]  M. Christopher Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Strategies for Reducing Cost and Improving Service (Second Edition) , 1999 .

[2]  Shueh-Chin Ting,et al.  The asymmetrical and non-linear effects of store quality attributes on customer satisfaction , 2002 .

[3]  Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,et al.  A fuzzy-mixed-integer goal programming model for a parallel-machine scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times and release dates , 2007 .

[4]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment , 1998 .

[5]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain , 2008 .

[6]  Weijaw Deng,et al.  Using a revised importance–performance analysis approach: The case of Taiwanese hot springs tourism , 2007 .

[7]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Terry G. Vavra Improving your measurement of customer satisfaction : a guide to creating, conducting, analyzing, and reporting customer satisfaction measurement programs , 1997 .

[9]  D. Brandt HOW SERVICE MARKETERS CAN IDENTIFY VALUE‐ENHANCING SERVICE ELEMENTS , 1988 .

[10]  Yu-Cheng Lee,et al.  A new fuzzy concept approach for Kano's model , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  N. Kano,et al.  Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality , 1984 .

[12]  E. Anderson,et al.  Strengthening the Satisfaction-Profit Chain , 2000 .

[13]  Brian Fynes,et al.  The effects of design quality on quality performance , 2005 .

[14]  Salih Z. Imamoglu,et al.  The effect of supply chain integration on information sharing:Enhancing the supply chain performance , 2011 .

[15]  Takao Enkawa,et al.  Consumer evaluation perspectives of service quality: evaluation factors and two-way model of quality , 1991 .

[16]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  The factor structure of customer satisfaction , 2002 .

[17]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: a reconsideration of the importance–performance analysis , 2004 .

[18]  Nagesh N. Murthy,et al.  Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility , 2008 .

[19]  Renato A. Krohling,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision making: A case study for accidents with oil spill in the sea , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..