Experimental results from RO-PRO: a next generation system for low-energy desalination.

A pilot system was designed and constructed to evaluate reverse osmosis (RO) energy reduction that can be achieved using pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO). The RO-PRO experimental system is the first known system to utilize energy from a volume of water transferred from atmospheric pressure to elevated pressure across a semipermeable membrane to prepressurize RO feedwater. In other words, the system demonstrated that pressure could be exchanged between PRO and RO subsystems. Additionally, the first experimental power density data for a RO-PRO system is now available. Average experimental power densities for the RO-PRO system ranged from 1.1 to 2.3 W/m2. This is higher than previous river-to-sea PRO pilot systems (1.5 W/m2) and closer to the goal of 5 W/m2 that would make PRO an economically feasible technology. Furthermore, isolated PRO system testing was performed to evaluate PRO element performance with higher cross-flow velocities and power densities exceeding 8 W/m2 were achieved with a 28 g/L NaCl draw solution. From this empirical data, inferences for future system performance can be drawn that indicate future RO-PRO systems may reduce the specific energy requirements for desalination by ∼1 kWh/m3.

[1]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Osmotic power production from salinity gradient resource by pressure retarded osmosis: Effects of operating conditions and reverse solute diffusion , 2012 .

[2]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Effects of transmembrane hydraulic pressure on performance of forward osmosis membranes. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  P. Christofides,et al.  Effect of Thermodynamic Restriction on Energy Cost Optimization of RO Membrane Water Desalination , 2009 .

[4]  Raphael Semiat,et al.  Energy issues in desalination processes. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Performance limiting effects in power generation from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of natural organic matter fouling and osmotic backwash on pressure retarded osmosis energy production from natural salinity gradients. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Seockheon Lee,et al.  Modeling reverse draw solute flux in forward osmosis with external concentration polarization in both sides of the draw and feed solution , 2013 .

[8]  T. Höpner,et al.  Environmental impact and impact assessment of seawater desalination , 2008 .

[9]  Maureen Hand,et al.  Land Use Requirements of Modern Wind Power Plants in the United States , 2009 .

[10]  John P. MacHarg,et al.  Retro-fitting existing SWRO systems with a new energy recovery device☆☆☆ , 2003 .

[11]  Masashi Fujitsuka,et al.  A feasibility study of pressure-retarded osmosis power generation system based on measuring permeation volume using reverse osmosis membrane , 2010 .

[12]  N. M. Wade,et al.  Environmental impacts of seawater distillation and reverse osmosis processes , 1997 .

[13]  Jeffrey A. Ruskowitz,et al.  RO-PRO desalination: An integrated low-energy approach to seawater desalination , 2014 .

[14]  Bruno Sauvet-Goichon,et al.  Ashkelon desalination plant — A successful challenge , 2007 .

[15]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Raising the Bar: Increased Hydraulic Pressure Allows Unprecedented High Power Densities in Pressure-Retarded Osmosis , 2014 .

[16]  Ngai Yin Yip,et al.  Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Young Kim,et al.  Experimental investigation of a spiral-wound pressure-retarded osmosis membrane module for osmotic power generation. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  R. Einav,et al.  The footprint of the desalination processes on the environment , 2003 .

[19]  W. Thelin,et al.  Natural organic matter fouling in pressure retarded osmosis , 2013 .

[20]  Rolf Jarle Aaberg,et al.  Osmotic power: A new and powerful renewable energy source? , 2003 .

[21]  Alon Zask,et al.  Reverse osmosis desalination plants — marine environmentalist regulator point of view , 2008 .

[22]  A. Tanioka,et al.  Power generation with salinity gradient by pressure retarded osmosis using concentrated brine from SWRO system and treated sewage as pure water , 2012 .

[23]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  D. A. Roberts,et al.  Impacts of desalination plant discharges on the marine environment: A critical review of published studies. , 2010, Water research.

[25]  M. Elimelech,et al.  The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment , 2011, Science.

[26]  Sudhakar M. Rao Reverse osmosis , 2007 .

[27]  B. Freeman,et al.  Surface modification of thin film composite membrane support layers with polydopamine: Enabling use , 2011 .

[28]  Richard L. Stover,et al.  Seawater reverse osmosis with isobaric energy recovery devices , 2007 .

[29]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of membrane support layer hydrophobicity on water flux in osmotically driven membrane processes , 2008 .

[30]  Nhu-Ngoc Bui,et al.  Hydrophilic nanofibers as new supports for thin film composite membranes for engineered osmosis. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  May-Britt Hägg,et al.  Preparation of thin film composite membranes with polyamide film on hydrophilic supports , 2013 .

[32]  Javier Romero,et al.  Impact of the brine from a desalination plant on a shallow seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) meadow , 2007 .

[33]  José Miguel González-Correa,et al.  Preliminary results of the monitoring of the brine discharge produced by the SWRO desalination plant of Alicante (SE Spain) , 2005 .

[34]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: An experimental and theoretical investigation , 2009 .

[35]  Thomas Melin,et al.  State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination , 2007 .

[36]  Stein Erik Skilhagen Osmotic power — a new, renewable energy source , 2010 .

[37]  Jessica D. Schiffman,et al.  Nanofibers in thin-film composite membrane support layers: Enabling expanded application of forward and pressure retarded osmosis , 2013 .

[38]  Andrea Achilli,et al.  Pressure-Retarded Osmosis , 2013 .

[39]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Adverse impact of feed channel spacers on the performance of pressure retarded osmosis. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[40]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Polyamide formation on a cellulose triacetate support for osmotic membranes: Effect of linking molecules on membrane performance , 2013 .

[41]  Sui Zhang,et al.  Effects of annealing on the microstructure and performance of cellulose acetate membranes for pressure-retarded osmosis processes , 2010 .

[42]  Husam Baalousha,et al.  Desalination status in the Gaza Strip and its environmental impact , 2006 .

[43]  Andrea Achilli,et al.  Pressure retarded osmosis: From the vision of Sidney Loeb to the first prototype installation — Review , 2010 .

[44]  Akili D. Khawaji,et al.  Advances in seawater desalination technologies , 2008 .

[45]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Effect of draw solution concentration and operating conditions on forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis performance in a spiral wound module , 2010 .

[46]  S. M. Al-Marwani,et al.  Parametric analyses of energy consumption and losses in SWCC SWRO plants utilizing energy recovery devices , 2008 .

[47]  Andrea Achilli,et al.  Standard methodology for evaluating membrane performance in osmotically driven membrane processes , 2013 .

[48]  Edvard Sivertsen,et al.  Pressure retarded osmosis efficiency for different hollow fibre membrane module flow configurations , 2013 .