Statistical approaches to language acquisition and the self-organizing consciousness: a reversal of perspective

Recent years have seen the upsurge of a new approach to language that moves away from the rule-based conventional framework. In this approach, mostly supported by the success of connectionist models, children learn language by exploiting the distributional properties of the input. It is argued in this paper that, in the same way as conforming to rules does not imply the existence of mental rules, conforming to statistical regularities does not imply that statistical computations are performed mentally. Sensitivity to statistical regularities can alternatively be conceived of as a by-product of the recurrent interplay between the properties of the current conscious content and the properties of the linguistic and extralinguistic environment. The validity of including the content of conscious experiences in an otherwise standard dynamical approach rooted in the notion of self-organization is discussed.

[1]  A. Rey,et al.  Does the mastery of center-embedded linguistic structures distinguish humans from nonhuman primates? , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  Two ways of learning associations , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  E. Newport,et al.  WORD SEGMENTATION : THE ROLE OF DISTRIBUTIONAL CUES , 1996 .

[4]  Nenagh Kemp,et al.  Do beez buzz? Rule-based and frequency-based knowledge in learning to spell plural -s. , 2003, Child development.

[5]  E. Gibson,et al.  Memory Limitations and Structural Forgetting: The Perception of Complex Ungrammatical Sentences as Grammatical , 1999 .

[6]  Steven Pinker,et al.  On language and connectionism , 1988 .

[7]  Pierre Perruchet,et al.  A critical reappraisal of the evidence for unconscious abstraction of deterministic rules in complex experimental situations , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  P. Smolensky.  On the proper treatment of connectionism , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Nick Chater,et al.  Connectionist and Statistical Approaches to Language Acquisition: A Distributional Perspective. , 1998 .

[11]  W. Freeman.  Second Commentary: On the proper treatment of connectionism by Paul Smolensky (1988) - Neuromachismo Rekindled , 1989 .

[12]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  Distributional properties of language and sub-syllabic processing units , 2004 .

[13]  S. Barton,et al.  Chaos, self-organization, and psychology. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[14]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Regular morphology and the lexicon. , 1995 .

[15]  S. Pinker,et al.  On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition , 1988, Cognition.

[16]  T. A. Cartwright,et al.  Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation , 1996, Cognition.

[17]  Annie Vinter,et al.  The formation of structurally relevant units in artificial grammar learning , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[18]  Kim Plunkett.  The segmentation problem in early language acquisition , 1991 .

[19]  LouAnn Gerken,et al.  Signal to syntax : bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition , 1996 .

[20]  Chris Eliasmith,et al.  The third contender: A critical examination of the Dynamicist theory of cognition , 1996 .

[21]  D. Dulany,et al.  Conscious Representation and Thought Systems , 1991 .

[22]  W. Fitch,et al.  Computational Constraints on Syntactic Processing in a Nonhuman Primate , 2004, Science.

[23]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Volume III. , 1967 .

[24]  A. Vinter,et al.  The self-organizing consciousness. , 2002, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[25]  Michael Ramscar.  The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require a rule , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  Sarah C. Creel,et al.  Distant melodies: statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies in tone sequences. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  R. Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: access to separable statistical cues by individual learners. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  R. Peereman,et al.  Learning Nonadjacent Dependencies: No Need for Algebraic-like Computations Is It Possible to Learn the Relation between 2 Nonadjacent Events? , 2004 .

[29]  N. Cowan.  Recurrent speech patterns as cues to the segmentation of multisyllabic sequences. , 1991, Acta psychologica.

[30]  Pawel Lewicki,et al.  Acquisition of procedural knowledge about a pattern of stimuli that cannot be articulated , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On learning the past-tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[32]  M. Brent,et al.  The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development , 2001, Cognition.

[33]  Pierre Perruchet,et al.  The exploitation of distributional information in syllable processing , 2004, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[34]  Nick Chater,et al.  Distributional Information: A Powerful Cue for Acquiring Syntactic Categories , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[35]  Michael Ramscar,et al.  Testing the Distributioanl Hypothesis: The influence of Context on Judgements of Semantic Similarity , 2001 .

[36]  D. Dulany.  Mentalistic Metatheory and Strategies , 2002 .

[37]  Mary R. Newsome,et al.  The Beginnings of Word Segmentation in English-Learning Infants , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  R. Gómez.  Variability and Detection of Invariant Structure , 2002, Psychological science.

[39]  M. Brent.  Advances in the computational study of language acquisition , 1996, Cognition.

[40]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Learning to Segment Speech Using Multiple Cues: A Connectionist Model , 1998 .

[41]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Mechanisms of Implicit Learning: Connectionist Models of Sequence Processing , 1993 .

[42]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  The Unity of Consciousness: Binding, Integration, and Dissociation , 2003 .

[44]  D. Lewkowicz,et al.  A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. , 2007, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[45]  A. Vinter.  The role of movement in eliciting early imitations , 1986 .

[46]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Finitary models of language users , 1963 .

[47]  Jerome Kagan,et al.  Change and continuity in infancy , 1971 .

[48]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[49]  M L Stanback,et al.  Syllable and rime patterns for teaching reading: Analysis of a frequency-based vocabulary of 17,602 words , 1992, Annals of dyslexia.

[50]  A. Vinter,et al.  PARSER: A Model for Word Segmentation , 1998 .

[51]  L. Schauble,et al.  Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. , 1994 .

[52]  Richard Wright,et al.  Implicit Learning of an Invariant: Just Say No , 1995 .

[53]  Marina Nespor,et al.  Signal-Driven Computations in Speech Processing , 2002, Science.

[54]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Implicit learning out of the lab: the case of orthographic regularities. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[55]  John R. Searle,et al.  The Rediscovery of the Mind , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[56]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[57]  Nick Chater,et al.  Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance , 1999 .