Evaluating the performance of infrastructure sharing in mobile radio networks

This work considers the strategic situation which arises when Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) coexisting in a given geographical area have to decide whether to invest in new radio access technology and whether to share the investment (and the infrastructure) with other operators. We focus on heterogeneous networks (HetNet) where MNOs add a layer of small cells to their existing macro cells. We address such strategic scenario by proposing a Mixed Integer Linear Programming formulation of the infrastructure sharing problem which takes as input techno-economic parameters as the achievable throughput in different sharing configurations, the pricing models for the service offered to the end users and the expectations on the return on investment for the mobile operators, and returns as output the “best” infrastructure/investment sharing options for the MNOs. The proposed formulation is finally leveraged to analyze the dynamics involved in the infrastructure sharing process under different techno-economic conditions in realistic network scenarios.

[1]  Tinku Mohamed Rasheed,et al.  On the role of infrastructure sharing for mobile network operators in emerging markets , 2011, Comput. Networks.

[2]  K. Johansson Cost Effective Deployment Strategies for Heterogenous Wireless Networks , 2007 .

[3]  Thomas Frisanco Strategic and Economic Benefits of Regionalization, Centralization, and Outsourcing of Mobile Network Operations Processes , 2009, 2009 Fifth International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications.

[4]  Christos Bouras,et al.  Financing and Pricing Small Cells in Next-Generation Mobile Networks , 2014, WWIC.

[5]  Fieke Offergelt,et al.  If you can't beat 'em, join 'em cooperative and non-cooperative games in network sharing , 2011, 2011 15th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks.

[6]  Américo Correia,et al.  Femtocell deployment in LTE-A networks: A sustainability, economical and capacity analysis , 2013, 2013 IEEE 24th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[7]  Brian W. Kernighan,et al.  AMPL: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming , 1993 .

[8]  Langford B. White,et al.  Cooperative resource allocation games in shared networks: symmetric and asymmetric fair bargaining models , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[9]  Luiz A. DaSilva,et al.  Efficient coverage through inter-operator infrastructure sharing in mobile networks , 2013, 2013 IFIP Wireless Days (WD).

[10]  J. Markendahl,et al.  Business models and resource management for shared wireless networks , 2004, IEEE 60th Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004. VTC2004-Fall. 2004.

[11]  C. Beckman,et al.  Shared networks: making wireless communication affordable , 2005, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[12]  Matteo Cesana,et al.  Network Selection and Resource Allocation Games for Wireless Access Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[13]  Jan Markendahl,et al.  Business models for deployment and operation of femtocell networks : Are new cooperation strategies needed for mobile operators? , 2010 .

[14]  Charles L. Despins,et al.  Analysis of CAPEX and OPEX benefits of wireless access virtualization , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC).

[15]  Thomas Frisanco,et al.  Infrastructure Sharing for Mobile Network Operators; From a Deployment and Operations View , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Information Networking.

[16]  Sahin Albayrak,et al.  Cooperative game theoretic approach to integrated bandwidth sharing and allocation , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Game Theory for Networks.

[17]  Zoraida Frias,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of femtocell deployment in long-term evolution networks , 2012, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..