Fractal geometry and vertebral compression fractures

Cancellous bone in postmenopausal osteoporosis is characterized by widely spaced and disconnected trabeculae. These architectural changes may disproportionately increase bone fragility compared with the decrease in bone mass alone. To determine whether there is an independent architectural contribution to fracture risk, we applied fractal geometry to the cancellous bone in osteoporosis. Fractal objects have recurrent, branching patterns that are quantified by a fractal dimension D, that describes how the object fills space. Photomicrographs of transiliac bone biopsy specimens were digitized, and D was calculated from the negative of the straight portion of the slope of the log of the number of pixels containing boundary points versus the log of the pixel size over a range of pixel sizes. The results were compared with the cancellous bone histomorphometry in 31 individuals, aged 19–80 years, who were healthy before sudden death. D was inversely related to age (r = −0.72, p < 0.0001) and trabecular spacing (r = −0.87; p < 0.0001) and directly related to bone area (r = 0.86, p < 0.0001) and trabecular number (r = 0.83, p < 0.0001). We then examined 12 healthy volunteers and 12 patients with vertebral compression fractures as a result of osteoporosis who were matched for age and cancellous bone area. The patients with fractures had a 7.9% lower mean value for D (1.224 ± 0.085 SD versus 1.329 ± 0.125, p < 0.026). Other markers of the cancellous architecture, such as trabecular width, separation, and number, were not different between the matched groups. D was more than 1 SD below the normal mean value in 50% of the fracture cases and in only 1 of the nonfracture cases (p < 0.025). Applied to cancellous bone, fractal geometry may discriminate more effectively between fracture and nonfracture cases than measurement of bone area and help accent the impact of architecture on bone fragility. The single expression, D, greatly simplifies description of the spatial distribution of cancellous bone and thus has a potential role in the computer‐assisted histologic investigation of osteoporosis.

[1]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Application of fractal geometry techniques to the study of trabecular bone. , 1993, Medical physics.

[2]  S. Cross,et al.  Trabecular bone does not have a fractal structure on light microscopic examination , 1993, The Journal of pathology.

[3]  Edward Ott,et al.  Particles Floating on a Moving Fluid: A Dynamically Comprehensible Physical Fractal , 1993, Science.

[4]  M Vogel,et al.  Trabecular bone pattern factor--a new parameter for simple quantification of bone microarchitecture. , 1992, Bone.

[5]  Gabriel Landini,et al.  Fractals and ophthalmology , 1992, The Lancet.

[6]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Loss of 'complexity' and aging. Potential applications of fractals and chaos theory to senescence. , 1992, JAMA.

[7]  Fractals and medicine , 1991, The Lancet.

[8]  G V Cochran,et al.  A new manual method for assessing two‐dimensional cancellous bone structure: Comparison between iliac crest and lumbar vertebra , 1991, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  R R Recker,et al.  A comparison of iliac bone histomorphometric data in post-menopausal osteoporotic and normal subjects. , 1990, Bone and mineral.

[10]  J. Compston,et al.  Age-related changes in trabecular width and spacing in human iliac crest biopsies. , 1989, Bone and mineral.

[11]  S. Goldstein,et al.  The direct examination of three‐dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography , 1989, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  R. Weinstein,et al.  Diminished rates of bone formation in normal black adults. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  M. Drezner,et al.  Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the asbmr histomorphometry nomenclature committee , 1987 .

[14]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[15]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. , 1983, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[16]  R. Weinstein,et al.  Qualitative bone defect in uremic osteosclerosis. , 1982, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[17]  I. Good,et al.  Fractals: Form, Chance and Dimension , 1978 .

[18]  A. Parfitt.  Implications of architecture for the pathogenesis and prevention of vertebral fracture. , 1992, Bone.

[19]  A. Vesterby,et al.  Star volume of marrow space and trabeculae in iliac crest: sampling procedure and correlation to star volume of first lumbar vertebra. , 1990, Bone.

[20]  R. Weinstein,et al.  Decreased trabecular width and increased trabecular spacing contribute to bone loss with aging. , 1987, Bone.

[21]  A. Villanueva,et al.  Metabolic bone disease with and without osteomalacia after intestinal bypass surgery: a bone histomorphometric study. , 1985, Bone.