Economic feasibility of no-tillage and manure for soil carbon sequestration in corn production in northeastern Kansas.

This study examined the economic potential of no-tillage versus conventional tillage to sequester soil carbon by using two rates of commercial N fertilizer or beef cattle manure for continuous corn (Zea mays L.) production. Yields, input rates, field operations, and prices from an experiment were used to simulate a distribution of net returns for eight production systems. Carbon release values from direct, embodied, and feedstock energies were estimated for each system, and were used with soil carbon sequestration rates from soil tests to determine the amount of net carbon sequestered by each system. The values of carbon credits that provide an incentive for managers to adopt production systems that sequester carbon at greater rates were derived. No-till systems had greater annual soil carbon gains, net carbon gains, and net returns than conventional tillage systems. Systems that used beef cattle manure had greater soil carbon gains and net carbon gains, but lower net returns, than systems that used commercial N fertilizer. Carbon credits would be needed to encourage the use of manure-fertilized cropping systems.

[1]  David E. Kissel,et al.  Crop rotation and tillage effects on soil organic carbon and nitrogen , 1990 .

[2]  Allan W. Gray,et al.  An Applied Procedure for Estimating and Simulating Multivariate Empirical (MVE) Probability Distributions In Farm-Level Risk Assessment and Policy Analysis , 2000, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[3]  J. Williams,et al.  Profitability of alternative production and tillage strategies for dryland wheat and grain sorghum in the Central Great Plains , 2000 .

[4]  C. Douglas,et al.  CQESTR: A model to estimate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils , 2001 .

[5]  K. Paustian,et al.  Economic Analysis of Agricultural Soil Carbon Sequestration: An Integrated Assessment Approach , 2001 .

[6]  L. R. Oliver,et al.  Economic Analysis of Conservation and Conventional Tillage Cropping Systems on Clayey Soil in Eastern Arkansas , 2001 .

[7]  R. Anderson,et al.  Conservation Reserve Program: Effects on soil organic carbon and preservation when converting back to cropland in northeastern Colorado , 2002 .

[8]  Keith Paustian,et al.  Predicted impact of management changes on soil carbon storage for each cropland region of the conterminous United States , 2002 .

[9]  W. Post,et al.  Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by tillage and crop rotation : A global data analysis , 2002 .

[10]  D. Reicosky,et al.  Continuous corn with moldboard tillage: Residue and fertility effects on soil carbon , 2002 .

[11]  G. Marland,et al.  A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: comparing tillage practices in the United States , 2002 .

[12]  W. Deen,et al.  Carbon sequestration in a long-term conventional versus conservation tillage experiment , 2003 .

[13]  Jeffery R. Williams,et al.  Carbon Sequestration in Soil with Consideration of CO2 Emissions from Production Inputs: An Economic Analysis , 2004 .

[14]  A. Halvorson,et al.  Economics of annual cropping versus crop-fallow in the northern great plains as influenced by tillage and nitrogen , 2004 .

[15]  J. Richardson,et al.  An Economic Comparison between Conventional and No-Tillage Farming Systems in Burleson County, Texas , 2004 .

[16]  K. Dhuyvetter,et al.  Per Unit Costs to Own and Operate Farm Machinery , 2005, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.