Precipitation, radiative forcing and global temperature change

Radiative forcing is a useful tool for predicting equilibrium global temperature change. However, it is not so useful for predicting global precipitation changes, as changes in precipitation strongly depend on the climate change mechanism and how it perturbs the atmospheric and surface energy budgets. Here a suite of climate model experiments and radiative transfer calculations are used to quantify and assess this dependency across a range of climate change mechanisms. It is shown that the precipitation response can be split into two parts: a fast atmospheric response that strongly correlates with the atmospheric component of radiative forcing, and a slower response to global surface temperature change that is independent of the climate change mechanism, ∼2-3% per unit of global surface temperature change. We highlight the precipitation response to black carbon aerosol forcing as falling within this range despite having an equilibrium response that is of opposite sign to the radiative forcing and global temperature change.

[1]  Michael E. Schlesinger,et al.  Intensity of hydrological cycles in warmer climates , 2003 .

[2]  Johannes Quaas,et al.  Total aerosol effect: radiative forcing or radiative flux perturbation? , 2009 .

[3]  A. Slingo,et al.  Studies with a flexible new radiation code. I: Choosing a configuration for a large-scale model , 1996 .

[4]  F. Lambert,et al.  Tropospheric adjustment: The response of two general circulation models to a change in insolation , 2007 .

[5]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  Understanding Land–Sea Warming Contrast in Response to Increasing Greenhouse Gases. Part I: Transient Adjustment , 2009 .

[6]  K. Shine.  Radiative Forcing of Climate Change , 2000 .

[7]  B. Soden,et al.  Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global Warming , 2006 .

[8]  G. Boer.  Climate change and the regulation of the surface moisture and energy budgets , 1993 .

[9]  O. Boucher,et al.  Climate response and efficacy of snow albedo forcing in the HadGEM2-AML climate model. , 2010 .

[10]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A Surface Energy Perspective on Climate Change , 2009 .

[11]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Nonlinear Aspects of the Climate Response to Greenhouse Gas and Aerosol Forcing , 2004 .

[12]  M. Webb,et al.  Tropospheric Adjustment Induces a Cloud Component in CO2 Forcing , 2008 .

[13]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  Time Variation of Effective Climate Sensitivity in GCMs , 2008 .

[14]  G. Stephens,et al.  Controls of Global-Mean Precipitation Increases in Global Warming GCM Experiments , 2008 .

[15]  F. H. Lambert,et al.  Are Changes in Global Precipitation Constrained by the Tropospheric Energy Budget , 2009 .

[16]  M. Webb,et al.  Dependency of global mean precipitation on surface temperature , 2008 .

[17]  B. Liepert,et al.  Do Models and Observations Disagree on the Rainfall Response to Global Warming , 2009 .

[18]  L. K. Gohar,et al.  Radiative forcing by well-mixed greenhouse gases: Estimates from climate models in the Intergovernme , 2006 .

[19]  Piers M. Forster,et al.  CO2 forcing induces semi‐direct effects with consequences for climate feedback interpretations , 2008 .

[20]  G. Martin,et al.  The Physical Properties of the Atmosphere in the New Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model (HadGEM1). Part I: Model Description and Global Climatology , 2006 .

[21]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Fast versus slow response in climate change: implications for the global hydrological cycle , 2010 .

[22]  Ken Takahashi.  The Global Hydrological Cycle and Atmospheric Shortwave Absorption in Climate Models under CO2 Forcing , 2009 .

[23]  O. Boucher,et al.  Aerosol forcing, climate response and climate sensitivity in the Hadley Centre climate model , 2007 .

[24]  P. Forster,et al.  On aspects of the concept of radiative forcing , 1997 .

[25]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Aerosols, Climate, and the Hydrological Cycle , 2001, Science.