Implantation and explantation of an active epiretinal visual prosthesis: 2-year follow-up data from the EPIRET3 prospective clinical trial

PurposeThe EPIRET3 retinal prosthesis was implanted in six volunteers legally blind from retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and removed after 4 weeks. Two years later, these subjects were re-examined to investigate ocular side effects and potential changes to quality of life.MethodsVision-related quality of life was recorded using the NEI-VFQ-25 questionnaire. Clinical data including interval history, visual acuity, and intraocular pressure were obtained. Anterior and posterior segments of the study eyes were examined and photographed; this included fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT).ResultsData from five patients could be analysed. Life-quality score was consistent with results obtained at baseline. No unexpected structural alteration could be found in the study eyes. A moderate epiretinal gliosis was present in areas where the epiretinal stimulator had been fixated using retinal tacks. Angiography revealed no leakage or neovascularisation; OCT showed no generalised increase of central retinal thickness.ConclusionsVision-related quality of life is low in patients suffering from end-stage RP. No further deterioration of life quality could however be detected within our monitoring period. Surgery was well tolerated by both patients and their eyes, without adverse events occurring during the follow-up period. Epiretinal gliosis is known to occur with retinal tacks, but seems of no major concern to the integrity of the study eyes. However, it may potentially interfere with functional aspects of active implants. Hence, alternative, possibly biochemical, fixation methods merit further research.