Transmission schemes and performance analysis for time-switching energy harvesting receivers

Compared with energy-harvesting transmitters, the performance of energy-harvesting receivers has not been fully investigated. The main consumption of energy at transmitters is for transmission, while that at receivers is for information decoding. Hence, the analysis and optimization of energy-harvesting transmitters and receivers are inherently different. Motivated by the above, in this paper, we analyze the performance of a time-switching energy-harvesting receiver, which switches between harvesting and decoding. We assume that the receiver can only harvest energy from the electromagnetic signal radiated by the transmitter and the energy consumption of other processing is negligible compared with decoding. We first argue that the energy consumed for decoding (per channel use) can be expressed in terms of the gap to channel capacity and utilize this model to optimize two schemes for receiver operation. The two schemes are Harvest-then-Receive and Harvest-when-Receive, and they differ primarily in how and when they use the harvested energy for decoding. We address the problem of maximizing the amount of information decoded over both single and multiple blocks, and use the binary symmetric channel as an example to validate the accuracy of our analysis.

[1]  Roy D. Yates,et al.  Hybrid ARQ in block-fading channels with an energy harvesting receiver , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT).

[2]  M. Aminshokrollahi New sequences of linear time erasure codes approaching the channel capacity , 1999 .

[3]  Aylin Yener,et al.  Optimum Transmission Policies for Battery Limited Energy Harvesting Nodes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  Roy D. Yates,et al.  Energy harvesting receivers: Finite battery capacity , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[5]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[6]  Venkatesan Guruswami,et al.  Polar Codes: Speed of Polarization and Polynomial Gap to Capacity , 2013, 2013 IEEE 54th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[7]  Rüdiger L. Urbanke,et al.  The renaissance of Gallager's low-density parity-check codes , 2003, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[8]  Zhu Han,et al.  Wireless Networks With RF Energy Harvesting: A Contemporary Survey , 2014, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[9]  Roy D. Yates,et al.  Fading channels in energy-harvesting receivers , 2014, 2014 48th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS).

[10]  Tsachy Weissman,et al.  The Information Lost in Erasures , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[11]  Daniel A. Spielman,et al.  Practical loss-resilient codes , 1997, STOC '97.

[12]  Sennur Ulukus,et al.  Achieving AWGN Capacity Under Stochastic Energy Harvesting , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[13]  Jing Yang,et al.  Transmission with Energy Harvesting Nodes in Fading Wireless Channels: Optimal Policies , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[14]  Anant Sahai,et al.  Towards a Communication-Theoretic Understanding of System-Level Power Consumption , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[15]  Jing Yang,et al.  Optimal Packet Scheduling in an Energy Harvesting Communication System , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Communications.