Empirical Improvements for Estimating Earthquake Response Spectra with Random‐Vibration Theory

The stochastic method of ground-motion simulation is often used in combination with the random-vibration theory to directly compute ground-motion in- tensity measures, thereby bypassing the more computationally intensive time-domain simulations. Key to the application of random-vibration theory to simulate response spectra is determining the duration (Drms) used in computing the root-mean-square oscillator response. Boore and Joyner (1984) originally proposed an equation for Drms, which was improved upon by Liu and Pezeshk (1999). Though these equations are both substantial improvements over using the duration of the ground-motion ex- citation for Drms, we document systematic differences between the ground-motion intensity measures derived from the random-vibration and time-domain methods for both of these Drms equations. These differences are generally less than 10% for most magnitudes, distances, and periods of engineering interest. Given the systematic nature of the differences, however, we feel that improved equations are warranted. We empirically derive new equations from time-domain simulations for eastern and western North America seismological models. The new equations improve the random-vibration simulations over a wide range of magnitudes, distances, and oscil- lator periods. Online Material: SMSIM parameter files, tables of coefficients and model parameters, and shaded contour plots of TD/RV ratios for two WNA models.

[1]  A. Kiureghian.  Structural Response to Stationary Excitation , 1980 .

[2]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Ground-motion relations for eastern North America , 1995, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Empirical Attenuation of Ground-Motion Spectral Amplitudes in Southeastern Canada and the Northeastern United States , 2004 .

[4]  Luca Malagnini,et al.  Attenuation and excitation of three-component ground motion in southern California , 1999 .

[5]  Gary C. Hart,et al.  Simulation of artificial earthquakes , 1973 .

[6]  Jasjeet S. Sekhon,et al.  Genetic Optimization Using Derivatives , 2011, Political Analysis.

[7]  D. Boore.  Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra , 1983 .

[8]  David M. Boore,et al.  A note on the use of random vibration theory to predict peak amplitudes of transient signals , 1984 .

[9]  Frank Scherbaum,et al.  The Estimation of Minimum-Misfit Stochastic Models from Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction Equations , 2006 .

[10]  David M. Boore,et al.  SMSIM — Fortran Programs for Simulating Ground Motions from Earthquakes: Version 2.3 — A Revision of OFR 96–80–A , 2000 .

[11]  W. Silva,et al.  Stochastic Modeling of California Ground Motions , 2000 .

[12]  David M. Boore,et al.  Simulation of Ground Motion Using the Stochastic Method , 2003 .

[13]  Russell A. Green,et al.  Damping Correction Factors for Horizontal Ground-Motion Response Spectra , 2007 .

[14]  D. Boore.  Comparing Stochastic Point-Source and Finite-Source Ground-Motion Simulations: SMSIM and EXSIM , 2009 .

[15]  David M. Boore,et al.  SSMSIM : Fortran programs for simulating ground motions from earthquakes , 1996 .

[16]  Shahram Pezeshk,et al.  An Improvement on the Estimation of Pseudoresponse Spectral Velocity Using RVT Method , 1999 .

[17]  D. Boore,et al.  Simulation of Ground Motion Using the Stochastic Method , 2003 .

[18]  M. Longuet-Higgins,et al.  The statistical distribution of the maxima of a random function , 1956, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[19]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Earthquake Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America , 2006 .

[20]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Earthquake Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern , 2007 .