Abstract. In recent years twin disc centrifugal spreaders have become larger with some manufacturers claiming to be able to spread fertilizer products as far as 60 m. To achieve wider spread widths, the fertilizer particle exit velocity off the disc has increased, as a result the ballistic qualities of the product becomes more critical. This case study uses data-mined information from Ravensdown Fertiliser Co-op Ltd, a major fertilizer supplier. This article examines and researches products used by arable and grassland farmers and studies the effect of changes in product characteristics on spread bout width from these newer spreaders. Ballistic modeling, based on particle density, size, and shape was used to test the distance fertilizer particles travel at various velocities. Fertilizer particle velocities were measured by high speed photometry using both common fertilizers and common spreaders found in New Zealand. Spreading equipment was pattern tested using the New Zealand Spreadmark method. Ballistic modeling of particles proved appropriate in ideal conditions. Fertilizer manufacturers believe that spreader operators often fail to take account of physical characteristics of products being spread and target the widest bout width possible. This can lead to an in-field Coefficient of Variation (CV) which is much greater than 15% and leads to sub-optimal utilization of fertilizer, where variations in particle size distribution occur. Similar situations have been experienced when spreading fertilizer blends; where blends previously spread successfully, at narrower bout widths now separate. Ballistic models could provide bout width recommendations for products and blends, for a range of applicators and reduce crop striping.
[1]
Mce Grafton,et al.
The ballistics of separation of fertiliser blends at wide bout widths
,
2014
.
[2]
Jacob Pemberton,et al.
Spreader testing for mixing and segregation of blended fertilizers
,
2009
.
[3]
Ian Yule.
THE EFFECT OF FERTILISER PARTICLE SIZE ON SPREAD DISTRIBUTION
,
2011
.
[4]
Ian J. Yule,et al.
Estimation of the in‐field variation in fertiliser application
,
2007
.
[5]
Michel José Anzanello,et al.
Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
,
2009
.
[6]
Daniel K Mullenix,et al.
Case Study: Distribution Uniformity of a Blended Fertilizer Applied Using a Variable-Rate Spinner-Disc Spreader
,
2013
.
[7]
Y. Schenkel,et al.
Spreading Segregation of Blended Fertilizers: Influence of the Particles Properties
,
2008
.