Beeping ADAS: Reflexive effect on drivers’ behavior

Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are designed to assist individuals while they are at the wheel of a motor vehicle. Many ADAS emit acoustic signals when parameters such as drivers’ maintained speed exceed given thresholds. This study examines the early and late effects on lane keeping and speed maintenance produced by both the onset of and prolonged exposure to a continuous beep like those emitted by ADAS. While driving a simulator along a straight road section, participants were presented with a single, continuous beep and its effect on drivers’ behavior was investigated. The findings show that the abrupt onset of beeping startles drivers, causing them to take their foot off the accelerator and, momentarily, deviate from the correct trajectory within the lane. This behavior is to be considered particularly dangerous, since ADAS are designed to beep when driving conditions become critical, i.e., precisely when drivers should not be distracted and should concentrate on the driving task. In response to this disturbance, drivers are observed to execute corrective behavior, i.e., braking, in order to regain control of their vehicle. These results support the idea that the abrupt onset of an acoustic stimulus like those emitted by ADAS can potentially disrupt driving. Researchers and car manufacturers should therefore consider this aspect of in-car technology interactions when designing new ADAS.

[1]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. , 1990, Psychological review.

[2]  Riccardo Rossi,et al.  Warning sound to affect perceived speed in approaching roundabouts: Experiments with a driving simulator , 2013 .

[3]  O V Lipp,et al.  The effect of warning stimulus modality on blink startle modification in reaction time tasks. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[4]  L. Andreone,et al.  Driver-vehicle interfaces and interaction: where are they going? , 2009 .

[5]  Jean-Michel Hoc,et al.  Objective and subjective evaluation of motor priming and warning systems applied to lateral control assistance. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Peter J. Lang,et al.  Emotion, novelty, and the startle reflex: habituation in humans. , 1993, Behavioral neuroscience.

[7]  R J Fairbanks,et al.  RESEARCH ON VEHICLE-BASED DRIVER STATUS/PERFORMANCE MONITORING; DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION, AND REFINEMENT OF ALGORITHMS FOR DETECTION OF DRIVER DROWSINESS. FINAL REPORT , 1994 .

[8]  J. Groeger Understanding Driving: Applying Cognitive Psychology to a Complex Everyday Task , 2000 .

[9]  Neil D Lerner,et al.  Multiple Attribute Evaluation of Auditory Warning Signals for In-Vehicle Crash Avoidance Warning Systems , 1995 .

[10]  M. Masson Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[11]  Mark Vollrath,et al.  Driving With a Partially Autonomous Forward Collision Warning System , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[12]  D. Strayer,et al.  Provided for Non-commercial Research and Educational Use Only. Not for Reproduction, Distribution or Commercial Use. Cognitive Distraction While Multitasking in the Automobile , 2022 .

[13]  Judy Edworthy,et al.  Designing urgency into auditory warnings using pitch, speed and loudness , 1996 .

[14]  Lana M Trick,et al.  The effects of visibility conditions, traffic density, and navigational challenge on speed compensation and driving performance in older adults. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Measuring Cognitive Distraction in the Automobile , 2013 .

[16]  Bor-Shong Liu,et al.  Effects of car-phone use and aggressive disposition during critical driving maneuvers , 2005 .

[17]  Riccardo Rossi,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Processing Spoken Words on Driving , 2012 .

[18]  Terry C Lansdown,et al.  Distraction from multiple in-vehicle secondary tasks: vehicle performance and mental workload implications , 2004, Ergonomics.

[19]  Dick de Waard,et al.  An Adaptive Driver Support System , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[20]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  The normal natural troubles of driving with GPS , 2012, CHI.

[21]  John D Lee,et al.  Auditory alerts for in-vehicle information systems: The effects of temporal conflict and sound parameters on driver attitudes and performance , 2004, Ergonomics.

[22]  John D. Lee,et al.  Preface to the Special Section on Driver Distraction , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[23]  Yousuke Kawachi,et al.  Auditory startle reflex inhibited by preceding self-action. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[24]  P. Matthews The human stretch reflex and the motor cortex , 1991, Trends in Neurosciences.

[25]  Carryl L. Baldwin,et al.  Perceived urgency mapping across modalities within a driving context. , 2014, Applied Ergonomics.

[26]  Andras Varhelyi,et al.  Auditory and Haptic Systems for in-Car Speed Management - A Comparative Real Life Study , 2008 .

[27]  Johnell O Brooks,et al.  Simulator sickness during driving simulation studies. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Johan Fagerlönn DISTRACTING EFFECTS OF AUDITORY WARNINGS ON EXPERIENCED DRIVERS , 2010, ICAD 2010.