Bone regeneration with calcium sulfate: evidence for increased angiogenesis in rabbits.

Autologous bone is the preferred bone graft material because it carries proteins as bone-enhancing substrates, minerals, and vital bone cells. Calcium sulfate (CS) is a well-tolerated, biodegradable, osteoconductive bone graft substitute and is a reasonable alternative to autogenous bone graft. Blood vessels are an important component of bone formation and maintenance. The process of vascular induction is called angiogenesis, and it plays a key role in all regenerative processes. Bone tissue differentiation is related to the local presence of blood vessels. One method to evaluate the presence of blood vessels in a tissue is to count the microvessels to evaluate microvessel density (MVD). The aim of the present study was to conduct a comparative evaluation of microvessel density in sites treated with CS and autologous bone in rabbits, with or without e-PTFE nonresorbable membranes (Gore-Tex, Flagstaff, Ariz). Nine New Zealand rabbits, each weighing about 2.5 kg, were used in this experiment. Three 6-mm wide defects were created in each tibial metaphysis. The defects were filled in a random way. The defects of group 1 (3 rabbits) were filled with CS granules (Surgiplaster, Classimplant, Rome, Italy) and covered with e-PTFE membranes. The defects in group 2 (3 rabbits) were filled with CS granules (Surgiplaster). The defects in group 3 (3 rabbits) were filled with autologous bone. A total of 54 defects were filled (18 with CS and e-PTFE membranes, 18 with CS alone, and 18 with autologous bone). No postoperative deaths or complications occurred. All nine animals were sacrificed at 4 weeks. MVD results were as follows: in the first group, 9.88 +/- 4.613; in the second group, 7.92 +/- 1.998; and in the third group, 5.56 +/- 1.895. P = .000 was highly significant. Statistically significant differences were found between groups 1 and 3, 1 and 2, and 2 and 3. The presence of more blood vessels in the sites treated with CS could help to explain the good results reported in the literature with the use of CS.

[1]  D. Alexander,et al.  Efficacy of calcium sulfate plus decompression bone in lumbar and lumbosacral spinal fusion: preliminary results in 40 patients. , 2001, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[2]  T. Turner,et al.  Use of a calcium sulfate-based bone graft substitute for benign bone lesions. , 2001, Orthopedics.

[3]  C. Kelly,et al.  The Use of a Surgical Grade Calcium Sulfate as a Bone Graft Substitute: Results of a Multicenter Trial , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  W. S. Pietrzak,et al.  Calcium sulfate bone void filler: a review and a look ahead. , 2000, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[5]  P. Esbrit,et al.  C-terminal parathyroid hormone-related protein increases vascular endothelial growth factor in human osteoblastic cells. , 2000, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[6]  H. Schliephake,et al.  Alveolar ridge repair using resorbable membranes and autogenous bone particles with simultaneous placement of implants: an experimental pilot study in dogs. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7]  A. Hadjipavlou,et al.  Plaster of Paris as an Osteoconductive Material for Interbody Vertebral Fusion in Mature Sheep , 2000, Spine.

[8]  G. Pecora,et al.  Augmentation of the maxillary sinus with calcium sulfate: one-year clinical report from a prospective longitudinal study. , 1999, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[9]  D. Bradford,et al.  Calcium sulfate- and calcium phosphate-based bone substitutes. Mimicry of the mineral phase of bone. , 1999, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[10]  A. Glaros,et al.  In vivo comparison of synthetic osseous graft materials. A preliminary study. , 1999, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[11]  N P Lang,et al.  The significance of angiogenesis in guided bone regeneration. A case report of a rabbit experiment. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[12]  A. Scarano,et al.  High-precision, cost-effective cutting system for producing thin sections of oral tissues containing dental implants. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[13]  Yasufumi Sato,et al.  [Regulators of angiogenesis]. , 1996, Nihon yakurigaku zasshi. Folia pharmacologica Japonica.

[14]  C. Cutting,et al.  Comparison of Residual Osseous Mass Between Vascularized and Nonvascularized Onlay Bone Transfers , 1983, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  A Piattelli,et al.  Microvessel density (MVD) and vascular endothelial growth factor expression (VEGF) in human oral squamous cell carcinoma. , 2001, Anticancer research.

[16]  J. Ricci,et al.  Biological mechanisms of calcium sulfate replacement by bone , 2000 .

[17]  D. Hunt,et al.  Autogenous bone harvesting: a chin graft technique for particulate and monocortical bone blocks. , 1999, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[18]  S. Bier,et al.  The versatility of calcium sulfate: resolving periodontal challenges. , 1999, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[19]  J. Folkman.  Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease , 1995, Nature Medicine.

[20]  W Eisenmenger,et al.  Changes in trabecular bone, hematopoiesis and bone marrow vessels in aplastic anemia, primary osteoporosis, and old age: a comparative histomorphometric study. , 1987, Bone.