Background: Our surroundings are full of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation (EMR) of different frequency and power. The non-ionizing EMRs emitted by television, computer and cellular phone (CF) sets have been increasing over the past few years. Objective: The aim of our study was to assess the effects of non-ionizing EMRs (frequency 3 × 10<sup>8</sup> to 3 × 10<sup>11</sup> Hz), emitted by CFs, on cutaneous blood flow in healthy volunteers. Methods: Thirty healthy volunteers (14 male and 16 female; age: 18–53 years) entered the study. Measurements of cutaneous blood flow were taken under standard conditions (temperature and humidity), using a laser Doppler He-Ne flowmeter that was applied to the ear skin by an optical fibre probe. Microflow values were recorded without CF contact with the skin (T₀), with the CF turned off but in contact with the ear skin (T<sub>1</sub>), with CF contact and turned on (T<sub>2</sub>), with CF contact, turned on and receiving (T<sub>3</sub>). The microflow values were also recorded backwards: with CF contact and set turned on (T<sub>4</sub>), with CF contact and turned off (T<sub>5</sub>), without CF contact (T<sub>6</sub>). Results: The mean value of basal microflow (T₀), expressed as perfusion units (PU), was 51.26 ± 11.93 PU. During the T<sub>1</sub> phase, the microflow increase was 61.38%; in T<sub>2</sub> it was 131.74%, in T<sub>3</sub> 157.67%, in T<sub>4</sub> 139.21% and in T<sub>5</sub> 122.90%; in T<sub>6</sub>, the microflow value was 57.58 ± 10 PU (similar to the basal microflow). Statistically significant cutaneous microflow values (p < 0.050) were observed comparing the T<sub>1</sub> to T<sub>5</sub> values with basal microflow (T₀). Furthermore, in comparison with T<sub>1</sub> values (CF turned off in contact with the ear skin), the T<sub>2</sub>, T<sub>3</sub> and T<sub>4</sub> data were statistically significant (T<sub>2</sub> vs. T<sub>1</sub>: t = 7.763 with p < 0.050; T<sub>3</sub> vs. T<sub>1</sub>: t = 9.834 with p < 0.050; T<sub>4</sub> vs. T<sub>1</sub>: t = 8.885 with p < 0.050).
[1]
A. P. Shepherd,et al.
Laser-Doppler Blood Flowmetry
,
2010,
Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.
[2]
G. Monfrecola,et al.
The Acute Effect of Smoking on Cutaneous Microcirculation Blood Flow in Habitual Smokers and Nonsmokers
,
1998,
Dermatology.
[3]
M. Repacholi,et al.
Radiofrequency field exposure and cancer: what do the laboratory studies suggest?
,
1997,
Environmental health perspectives.
[4]
A Basten,et al.
Lymphomas in E mu-Pim1 transgenic mice exposed to pulsed 900 MHZ electromagnetic fields.
,
1997,
Radiation research.
[5]
S. Szmigielski,et al.
Cancer morbidity in subjects occupationally exposed to high frequency (radiofrequency and microwave) electromagnetic radiation.
,
1996,
The Science of the total environment.
[6]
P. Pochi.
The Physiology and Pathophysiology of the Skin
,
1988
.
[7]
J. Johnson,et al.
Nonthermoregulatory control of human skin blood flow.
,
1986,
Journal of applied physiology.
[8]
Luc Duteil,et al.
A Double Wavelength Laser Doppler System to Investigate Skin Microcirculation
,
1985,
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[9]
R. Nossal,et al.
Model for laser Doppler measurements of blood flow in tissue.
,
1981,
Applied optics.
[10]
T. Ryan.
The blood vessels of the skin.
,
1976,
The Journal of investigative dermatology.
[11]
Gert Nilsson.
Perimed’s LDV Flowmeter
,
1990
.
[12]
G. A. Holloway,et al.
An Instrument to Measure Cutaneous Blood Flow Using the Doppler Shift of Laser Light
,
1978,
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[13]
H M WRIGHT,et al.
THE CUTANEOUS CIRCULATION.
,
1964,
The Journal of osteopathy.