Proteomic analyses using an accurate mass and time tag strategy.

An accurate mass and time (AMT) tag approach for proteomic analyses has been developed over the past several years to facilitate comprehensive high-throughput proteomic measurements. An AMT tag database for an organism, tissue, or cell line is established by initially performing standard shotgun proteomic analysis and, most importantly, by validating peptide identifications using the mass measurement accuracy of Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FTICR) mass spectrometry (MS) and liquid chromatography (LC) elution time constraint. Creation of an AMT tag database largely obviates the need for subsequent MS/MS analyses, and thus facilitates high-throughput analyses. The strength of this technology resides in the ability to achieve highly efficient and reproducible one-dimensional reversed-phased LC separations in conjunction with highly accurate mass measurements using FTICR MS. Recent improvements allow for the analysis of as little as picrogram amounts of proteome samples by minimizing sample handling and maximizing peptide recovery. The nanoproteomics platform has also demonstrated the ability to detect >10(6) differences in protein abundances and identify more abundant proteins from subpicogram amounts of samples. The AMT tag approach is poised to become a new standard technique for the in-depth and high-throughput analysis of complex organisms and clinical samples, with the potential to extend the analysis to a single mammalian cell.

[1]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Sequence analysis of proteins separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis: Towards an integrated protein database , 1990, Electrophoresis.

[2]  J. Yates,et al.  An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database , 1994, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[3]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Mass spectrometric approaches for the identification of gel‐separated proteins , 1995, Electrophoresis.

[4]  J. Seilhamer,et al.  A comparison of selected mRNA and protein abundances in human liver , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[5]  Denis F. Hochstrasser,et al.  Proteome in Perspective , 1998, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[6]  J. Yates Mass spectrometry and the age of the proteome. , 1998, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[7]  A. Marshall,et al.  Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry: a primer. , 1998, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[8]  F. Cross,et al.  Accurate quantitation of protein expression and site-specific phosphorylation. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  S. Gygi,et al.  Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Nikola Tolić,et al.  High throughput proteome-wide precision measurements of protein expression using mass spectrometry , 1999 .

[11]  Nikola Tolić,et al.  Mass spectrometic detection for capillary isoelectric focusing separations of complex protein mixtures , 2000 .

[12]  M E Belov,et al.  Zeptomole-sensitivity electrospray ionization--Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry of proteins. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  W. McDonald,et al.  Proteomic Tools for Cell Biology , 2000, Traffic.

[14]  D. Black Protein Diversity from Alternative Splicing A Challenge for Bioinformatics and Post-Genome Biology , 2000, Cell.

[15]  J. Shabanowitz,et al.  Subfemtomole MS and MS/MS peptide sequence analysis using nano-HPLC micro-ESI fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  S. Gygi,et al.  Evaluation of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis-based proteome analysis technology. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M E Belov,et al.  High-throughput proteomics using high-efficiency multiple-capillary liquid chromatography with on-line high-performance ESI FTICR mass spectrometry. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  X. Yao,et al.  Proteolytic 18O labeling for comparative proteomics: model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  J. Yates,et al.  Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  D. Goodlett,et al.  Proteomics without polyacrylamide: qualitative and quantitative uses of tandem mass spectrometry in proteome analysis , 2002, Functional & Integrative Genomics.

[21]  J. Yates,et al.  An automated multidimensional protein identification technology for shotgun proteomics. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[22]  M J MacCoss,et al.  Proteomics: analytical tools and techniques , 2001, Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care.

[23]  T. Veenstra,et al.  Packed capillary reversed-phase liquid chromatography with high-performance electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry for proteomics. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[24]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Phosphoprotein isotope-coded affinity tag approach for isolating and quantitating phosphopeptides in proteome-wide analyses. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[25]  F. Regnier,et al.  Fractionation of isotopically labeled peptides in quantitative proteomics. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[26]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Approaching complete peroxisome characterization by gas‐phase fractionation , 2002, Electrophoresis.

[27]  R. Hewick,et al.  Acid-labile isotope-coded extractants: a class of reagents for quantitative mass spectrometric analysis of complex protein mixtures. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[28]  S. Gygi,et al.  Automation of nanoscale microcapillary liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with a vented column. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[29]  Ljiljana Paša-Tolić,et al.  ESI-FTICR mass spectrometry employing Data-dependent external ion selection and accumulation , 2002, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[30]  John R Yates,et al.  Analysis of quantitative proteomic data generated via multidimensional protein identification technology. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[31]  A. Marshall,et al.  Resolution of 11,000 compositionally distinct components in a single electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrum of crude oil. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[32]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Mass measurement errors caused by “local” frequency perturbations in FTICR mass spectrometry , 2002, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[33]  J. Yates,et al.  Shotgun Proteomics and Biomarker Discovery , 2002, Disease markers.

[34]  Ronald J Moore,et al.  Global analysis of the Deinococcus radiodurans proteome by using accurate mass tags , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  John D. Storey,et al.  Precision and functional specificity in mRNA decay , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  High-efficiency nanoscale liquid chromatography coupled on-line with mass spectrometry using nanoelectrospray ionization for proteomics. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[37]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Quantitative proteome analysis by solid-phase isotope tagging and mass spectrometry , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[38]  John R Yates,et al.  Multidimensional separations for protein/peptide analysis in the post-genomic era. , 2002, BioTechniques.

[39]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Advances in quantitative proteomics via stable isotope tagging and mass spectrometry. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[40]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Stable isotope-coded proteomic mass spectrometry. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[41]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Phosphoprotein isotope-coded solid-phase tag approach for enrichment and quantitative analysis of phosphopeptides from complex mixtures. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[42]  Samuel I. Miller,et al.  Proteomic analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa grown under magnesium limitation , 2003, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[43]  Quantitative evaluation of sample application methods for semipreparative separations of basic proteins by two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis , 2003, Electrophoresis.

[44]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2003, Nature.

[45]  M. Hermsen,et al.  Genomics and proteomics in cancer. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[46]  S. Gygi,et al.  Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  McDonald Wh,et al.  Shotgun proteomics: integrating technologies to answer biological questions. , 2003, Current opinion in molecular therapeutics.

[48]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Proteome analysis by mass spectrometry. , 2003, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[49]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Proteome analyses using accurate mass and elution time peptide tags with capillary LC time-of-flight mass spectrometry , 2003, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[50]  Nikola Tolić,et al.  Ultrasensitive proteomics using high-efficiency on-line micro-SPE-nanoLC-nanoESI MS and MS/MS. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[51]  Ronald J Moore,et al.  Ultra-high-efficiency strong cation exchange LC/RPLC/MS/MS for high dynamic range characterization of the human plasma proteome. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[52]  Roman A. Zubarev,et al.  Shifted-basis technique improves accuracy of peak position determination in Fourier transform mass spectrometry , 2004, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.