A Shared Point of Access to Facilitate Interagency Collaboration

Elders and their caregivers oftentimes have difficulty coordinating services among human service agencies. In addition, service providers spend countless hours collecting information that has already been collected by other service providers, and suboptimal communication between agencies hinders the ability to coordinate services. The project discussed in this paper prototyped the use of a Shared Point of Access (SPA) between a group of nonprofit agencies providing services to senior citizens to facilitate interagency case management. Its design and development, specifically including leadership issues, database system models, HIPAA, and governance structures, are outlined in this paper.

[1]  The History and Function of the Target Cities Management Information Systems , 1998 .

[2]  K. Provan Technology and interorganizational activity as predictors of client referrals. , 1984, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[3]  R. Quinn The Impacts of a Computerized Information System on the Integration and Coordination of Human Services. , 1976 .

[4]  Eugene Bardach,et al.  Developmental Dynamics: Interagency Collaboration as an Emergent Phenomenon , 2001 .

[5]  K. Provan,et al.  A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems , 1995 .

[6]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1990 .

[7]  G. Midgley Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice , 2000 .

[8]  John P. van Gigch,et al.  System Design Modeling and Metamodeling , 1991 .

[9]  Alice M Schumaker,et al.  Interorganizational networks: using a theoretical model to predict effectiveness of rural health care delivery networks. , 2002, Journal of health and human services administration.

[10]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems , 1996, MIS Q..

[11]  G. Royston,et al.  Using system dynamics to help develop and implement policies and programmes in health care in England , 1999 .

[12]  John W. Satzinger,et al.  Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World , 2000 .

[13]  Eric Wolstenholme,et al.  A patient flow perspective of U.K. health services: exploring the case for new “intermediate care” initiatives , 1999 .

[14]  Charles Kadushin,et al.  “Fighting Back” Against Substance Abuse: The Structure and Function of Community Coalitions , 2004 .

[15]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  Understanding computer-mediated interorganizational collaboration: a model and framework , 2005, Journal of Knowledge Management.

[16]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Diagnosing the system for organizations: S. BEER Wiley, Chichester, 1985, 152 + xiii pages, £7.50 , 1986 .

[17]  Jeanne C. Rivard,et al.  The Dynamics of Interagency Collaboration: How Linkages Develop for Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice Sectors in a System of Care Demonstration , 1999, Mental Health Services and Sectors of Care.

[18]  J. Homer,et al.  Models for collaboration: how system dynamics helped a community organize cost‐effective care for chronic illness , 2004 .

[19]  Yolande E. Chan,et al.  Leading the development and implementation of collaborative interorganizational systems , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[20]  G. Hamilton Theory And Practice Of Social Case Work , 1941 .

[21]  D. Fitch Client-controlled case information: a general system theory perspective. , 2004, Social work.