Acoustic differences in morphologically-distinct homophones
暂无分享,去创建一个
Robert Malouf | Marc Garellek | Farrell Ackerman | Scott Seyfarth | Gwendolyn Gillingham | Robert Malouf | M. Garellek | Farrell Ackerman | S. Seyfarth | Gwendolyn Gillingham
[1] Martin Corley,et al. Articulatory evidence for feedback and competition in speech production , 2009 .
[2] V. Ferreira,et al. The Oxford Handbook of Language Production , 2014 .
[3] Ariel M. Cohen-Goldberg,et al. Towards a theory of multimorphemic word production: The heterogeneity of processing hypothesis , 2013 .
[4] Mirjam Ernestus,et al. Articulatory Planning Is Continuous and Sensitive to Informational Redundancy , 2005, Phonetica.
[5] Christo Kirov,et al. Bayesian Speech Production: Evidence from Latency and Hyperarticulation , 2013, CogSci.
[6] William Labov,et al. A Study of the Non-Standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican Speakers in New York City. Volume I: Phonological and Grammatical Analysis. , 1968 .
[7] ERIN CONWELL,et al. Prosodic disambiguation of noun/verb homophones in child-directed speech* , 2016, Journal of Child Language.
[8] T. A. Hall. The Distribution of Superheavy Syllables in Modern English , 2001 .
[9] James M Scobbie,et al. Morphemes, Phonetics and Lexical Items: The Case of the Scottish Vowel Length Rule. , 1999 .
[10] Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al. Durational cues to fricative codas in 2-year-olds' American English: voicing and morphemic factors. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] Brenda Rapp,et al. The interface between morphology and phonology: Exploring a morpho-phonological deficit in spoken production , 2013, Cognition.
[12] Marianne Pouplier,et al. Intention in articulation: Articulatory timing in alternating consonant sequences and its implications for models of speech production , 2010, Language and cognitive processes.
[13] Sang-Im Lee-Kim,et al. Morphological effects on the darkness of English intervocalic /l/ , 2013 .
[14] Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al. Word-boundary-related duration patterns in English , 2000, J. Phonetics.
[15] Dani Byrd,et al. The elastic phrase: modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening , 2003, J. Phonetics.
[16] Allard Jongman,et al. Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception: evidence from Dutch , 2004, J. Phonetics.
[17] Beth L. Losiewicz. The effect of frequency on linguistic morphology , 1992 .
[18] Keelan Evanini,et al. Intrinsic vowel duration and the post-vocalic voicing effect: some evidence from dialects of north american English , 2009, INTERSPEECH.
[19] M. Gaskell,et al. A written word is worth a thousand spoken words: The influence of spelling on spoken-word production , 2012 .
[20] Esteban Buz,et al. The (in)dependence of articulation and lexical planning during isolated word production , 2016, Language, cognition and neuroscience.
[21] P. Keating. PHONETIC ENCODING OF PROSODIC STRUCTURE , 2003 .
[22] Mirjam Ernestus,et al. Morphological predictability and acoustic duration of interfixes in Dutch compounds. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] Paul Boersma,et al. Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .
[24] P. Lieberman. Some Effects of Semantic and Grammatical Context on the Production and Perception of Speech , 1963 .
[25] Louis Goldstein,et al. Dynamics in grammar: Comment on Ladd and Ernestus & Baayen , 2006 .
[26] Duane G. Watson,et al. The Effect of Phonological Encoding on Word Duration: Selection Takes Time , 2015 .
[27] Jonah Katz. Compression effects, perceptual asymmetries, and the grammar of timing , 2010 .
[28] Sahyang Kim,et al. Prosodic strengthening on the /s/-stop cluster and the phonetic implementation of an allophonic rule in English , 2014, J. Phonetics.
[29] A. Crompton,et al. Syllables and segments in speech production , 1981 .
[30] Frank Parker,et al. The duration of morphemic and non-morphemic /s/ in English , 1983 .
[31] Viktor Kharlamov,et al. Incomplete neutralization of the voicing contrast in word-final obstruents in Russian: Phonological, lexical, and methodological influences , 2014, J. Phonetics.
[32] M. Brysbaert,et al. Adding part-of-speech information to the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.
[33] Sarah Hawkins,et al. “Compensatory shortening” in monosyllables of spoken English , 1992 .
[34] Melissa Frazier. to appear in NELS 36 Output-Output Faithfulness to Moraic Structure : Evidence from American English * , 2006 .
[35] W. Jassem,et al. Neutralization of voicing in Polish obstruents , 1989 .
[36] S. Gahl. Time and Thyme Are not Homophones: The Effect of Lemma Frequency on Word Durations in Spontaneous Speech , 2008 .
[37] Laurence White,et al. English words on the Procrustean bed: Polysyllabic shortening reconsidered , 2010, J. Phonetics.
[38] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[39] Søren Højsgaard,et al. A Kenward-Roger approximation and parametric bootstrap methods for tests in linear mixed models: The R Package pbkrtest , 2014 .
[40] A. Caramazza,et al. Lexical access and inflectional morphology , 1988, Cognition.
[41] Barbara Schuppler,et al. How linguistic and probabilistic properties of a word affect the realization of its final /t/: Studies at the phonemic and sub-phonemic level , 2012, J. Phonetics.
[42] W. Levelt,et al. Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? , 1994, Cognition.
[43] Jordan B. Brewer,et al. PHONETIC REFLEXES OF ORTHOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS IN LEXICAL REPRESENTATION , 2008 .
[44] R. Baayen,et al. Morphological effects on fine phonetic detail: The case of Dutch -igheid , 2010 .
[45] Matthew H. Davis,et al. Leading Up the Lexical Garden Path: Segmentation and Ambiguity in Spoken Word Recognition , 2002 .
[46] SUZANNE KEMMER,et al. The Phonology of the Lexicon : Evidence from Lexical Diffusion , 2013 .
[47] R. Baayen,et al. Shifting paradigms: gradient structure in morphology , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[48] Stuart Davis. Capitalistic v. Militaristic: The Paradigm Uniformity Effect Reconsidered , 2004 .
[49] Keith Johnson,et al. Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech , 2012 .
[50] Russell V. Lenth,et al. Least-Squares Means: The R Package lsmeans , 2016 .
[51] Francesca Masini,et al. The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory , 2018 .
[52] Sarah Hawkins,et al. Phonetic detail that distinguishes prefixed from pseudo-prefixed words , 2012, J. Phonetics.
[53] Grover Hudson,et al. PHONOLOGY AND LANGUAGE USE , 2004 .
[54] Colin W. Wightman,et al. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[55] D. K. Oller,et al. The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[56] Patrycja Strycharczuk,et al. Gradual or abrupt? The phonetic path to morphologisation , 2016, J. Phonetics.
[57] D. Klatt. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[58] Julia F. Strand,et al. Many neighborhoods: Phonological and perceptual neighborhood density in lexical production and perception , 2016 .
[59] R. R. Peterson,et al. Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. , 1998 .
[60] Willem J. M. Levelt,et al. A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[61] L. Feldman. Modeling Morphological Processing , 2013 .
[62] M. Fourakis,et al. On the ‘Incomplete Neutralization’ of German Final Obstruents , 1984 .
[63] Osamu Fujimura,et al. Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation , 1993 .
[64] Joan L. Bybee,et al. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change , 2002, Language Variation and Change.
[65] Louis C. W. Pols,et al. How efficient is speech , 2003 .
[66] Mirjam Ernestus,et al. The role of morphology in acoustic reduction , 2012 .
[67] J. Hay. Causes and Consequences of Word Structure , 2003 .
[68] G. Kunter,et al. Homophony and morphology: The acoustics of word-final S in English 1 , 2015, Journal of Linguistics.
[69] Alexandros Christodoulou,et al. Variation in Word Duration and Planning , 2012 .
[70] James P. Blevins,et al. Word-based morphology , 2006, Journal of Linguistics.
[71] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.
[72] Patrycja Strycharczuk,et al. Velocity measures in ultrasound data. Gestural timing of post-vocalic /l/ in English , 2015, ICPhS.
[73] Gregory R. Guy. Explanation in variable phonology: An exponential model of morphological constraints , 1991, Language Variation and Change.
[74] Sarah Hawkins,et al. PHONETIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MIS- AND DIS- IN ENGLISH PREFIXED AND PSEUDO-PREFIXED WORDS , 2007 .
[75] J. Hay. Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? , 2001 .
[76] L. Leonard,et al. Some differences between English plural noun inflections and third singular verb inflections in the input: the contributions of frequency, sentence position, and duration , 1999, Journal of Child Language.
[77] Sungbok Lee,et al. How far, how long: on the temporal scope of prosodic boundary effects. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[78] Bruce Hayes,et al. Gradient Well-Formedness in Optimality Theory , 2000 .
[79] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. Synthesising meaning and processing approaches to prosody: performance matters , 2015, Language, cognition and neuroscience.
[80] T. Florian Jaeger,et al. Signal Reduction and Linguistic Encoding , 2017 .
[81] A. Turk,et al. Durational correlates of English sublexical constituent structure* , 2009, Phonology.
[82] James P. Blevins. Word and Paradigm Morphology , 2016 .
[83] Abby Walker,et al. Phonological, lexical, and frequency factors in coronal stop deletion in early New Zealand English , 2008 .
[84] Patrycja Strycharczuk,et al. Morphological effects on pronunciation , 2015, ICPhS.
[85] Sharon Peperkamp,et al. Aspiration and the gradient structure of English prefixed words , 2015, ICPhS.
[86] Cécile Fougeron,et al. Articulatory properties of initial segments in several prosodic constituents in French , 2001, J. Phonetics.
[87] Susan Shaiman,et al. Kinematics of compensatory vowel shortening: the effect of speaking rate and coda composition on intra- and inter-articulatory timing , 2001, J. Phonetics.
[88] R. Harald Baayen,et al. Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity , 1992 .
[89] R. Raffelsiefen. Paradigm Uniformity Effects Versus Boundary Effects , 2004 .
[90] Jason M. Brenier,et al. Predictability Effects on Durations of Content and Function Words in Conversational English , 2009 .
[91] A. Turk,et al. The domain of phrase‐final lengthening in English , 1998 .
[92] Anne Pier Salverda,et al. The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension , 2003, Cognition.
[93] Cécile Fougeron,et al. The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonology , 2011 .
[94] R. Shi,et al. Prosodic Cues to Noun and Verb Categories in Infant-Directed Mandarin Speech , 2010 .
[95] A. Turk,et al. Phonetic Reflexes of Morphological Boundaries at a Normal Speech Rate , 2004 .
[96] Adamantios I. Gafos,et al. Dynamics in grammar : comment on Ladd and Ernestus & Baayen * , 2005 .
[97] Lisa M. Lavoie,et al. Some influences on the realization of for and four in American English , 2002, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.
[98] B. Rapp,et al. Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. , 2000, Psychological review.
[99] R. Port,et al. Incomplete neutralization and pragmatics in German , 1989 .
[100] G S Dell,et al. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.
[101] Laura J. Blazej,et al. Can we hear morphological complexity before words are complex? , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[102] Joan L. Bybee. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form , 1985 .
[103] R Berkovits,et al. Progressive Utterance-Final Lengthening in Syllables with Final Fricatives , 1993, Language and speech.
[104] Barbara Schuppler,et al. Informal speech processes can be categorical in nature, even if they affect many different words. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[105] Scott Seyfarth,et al. Word informativity influences acoustic duration: Effects of contextual predictability on lexical representation , 2014, Cognition.
[106] D E Francke. The written word. , 1979, American journal of hospital pharmacy.
[107] R. Harald Baayen,et al. The functionality of incomplete neutralization in Dutch: The case of past-tense formation , 2006 .
[108] Brenda Rapp,et al. Mrs. Malaprop's Neighborhood: Using Word Errors to Reveal Neighborhood Structure. , 2010, Journal of memory and language.
[109] Matthew A Goldrick,et al. Limited interaction in speech production: Chronometric, speech error, and neuropsychological evidence , 2006 .
[110] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. Thematic role predictability and planning affect word duration , 2017 .
[111] Keith Johnson,et al. Decisions and mechanisms in exemplar-based phonology , 2005 .
[112] Robert Schreuder,et al. Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity , 1992 .
[113] Robert Schreuder,et al. Prosodic cues for morphological complexity in Dutch and English , 2005 .
[114] S. Blumstein,et al. Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters , 2006 .
[115] A. Lahiri,et al. Prosodic Units in Speech Production , 1997 .
[116] Jeffrey Steele,et al. Missing Inflection in L2 Acquisition: Defective Syntax or L1-Constrained Prosodic Representations? , 2003 .
[117] Sven Grawunder,et al. Assessing incomplete neutralization of final devoicing in German , 2014, J. Phonetics.
[118] Susanne Gahl,et al. Lexical competition in vowel articulation revisited: Vowel dispersion in the Easy/Hard database , 2015, J. Phonetics.
[119] Joseph Keshet,et al. Automatic analysis of slips of the tongue: Insights into the cognitive architecture of speech production , 2016, Cognition.
[120] C. Gussenhoven,et al. Final lengthening at prosodic boundaries in Dutch , 1995 .
[121] Allard Jongman,et al. Orthographic vs. morphological incomplete neutralization effects , 2006, J. Phonetics.
[122] Paul Boersma,et al. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .
[123] I. Lehiste. The Timing of Utterances and Linguistic Boundaries , 1972 .
[124] Bodo Winter,et al. The Nature of Incomplete Neutralization in German : Implications for Laboratory Phonology , 2012 .
[125] T. A. Hall. Against extrasyllabic consonants in German and English , 2002, Phonology.
[126] Ingo Plag,et al. Phonological and phonetic variability in complex words: an uncharted territory , 2014 .
[127] Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al. Paradigm Uniformity and the Phonetics-Phonology Boundary , 1996 .
[128] Joshua de Leeuw,et al. jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser , 2014, Behavior Research Methods.
[129] Matthew Goldrick,et al. Interaction and representational integration: Evidence from speech errors , 2011, Cognition.
[130] D. Bates,et al. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.
[131] Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al. Word-specific phonetics , 2001 .
[132] Jonah Katz,et al. Compression effects in English , 2012, J. Phonetics.
[133] R. H. Baayen,et al. Paradigmatic structure in speech production , 2008 .
[134] Clara Cohen,et al. Probabilistic reduction and probabilistic enhancement , 2014 .
[135] H. Baayen,et al. Paradigmatic effects in auditory word recognition: The case of alternating voice in Dutch , 2007 .