The often documented failures to use information in planning and policy can be attributed in part to the influence of the positivist view of knowledge on planning practice. This has encouraged planners to try to be value neutral, to focus on measurable issues and general principles, and see the production of information as distinct from the political process. A phenomenological conception of knowledge, on the other hand, focuses on unique and particular situations, and on the everyday world, it emphasizes the subjective meanings of the problems to the actors, it assumes knowledge is constructed in a community rather than having an independent existence, and it accepts that information is shaped by preconceptions. As a guide to planning practice, it can better link knowledge to action because (1) it deals with issues in forms more recognizable to decision makers, (2) it offers a more realistic model of what many practitioners actually do, and (3) it engages the decision makers in the information production...
[1]
K. Kraemer,et al.
REQUIEM FOR USAC
,
1979
.
[2]
Ronald D. Brunner.
The policy sciences as science
,
1982
.
[3]
Elizabeth Howe,et al.
The Ethics of Contemporary American Planners
,
1979
.
[4]
Elizabeth Howe.
Role Choices of Urban Planners
,
1980
.
[5]
Judith Innes de Neufville,et al.
Planning Theory and Practice: Bridging the Gap
,
1983
.
[6]
Judith Innes de Neufville,et al.
Validating policy indicators
,
1978
.
[7]
John S. Dryzek,et al.
Policy analysis as a hermeneutic activity
,
1982
.
[8]
Douglass B. Lee.
Requiem for Large-Scale Models
,
1973
.