BALANCING CAPABILITY BUILDING FOR RADICAL AND INCREMENTAL INNOVATIONS

This paper explores the kind of learning that creates capabilities needed in incremental and radical innovation development. The empirical evidence is based on four innovation-related development projects, implemented through enterprise-student team collaboration. It seems that the richness of innovation and learning processes affects the diverseness of developed capabilities. The goal of innovation development drives learning and capability building, while improved capabilities help adopt challenging goals that stimulate a new level of learning. The process emphasising analysis, planning and analytical knowledge creates capabilities resulting in incremental inventions. The innovation process that focuses on experimentation and utilisation of other knowledge types facilitates capability building resulting in inventions that are radical in nature. These two process types are not contrary but complementary options to develop solutions to satisfy the expressed and unexpressed needs of customers. This paper presents views on how to interconnect these processes characterised by divergent rhythms.

[1]  Paul Hyland,et al.  Exploration and exploitation: the interplay between knowledge and continuous innovation , 2008, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[2]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  Exploring the Antecedents of Potential Absorptive Capacity and Its Impact on Innovation Performance , 2008 .

[3]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[4]  Tom Connor,et al.  Customer‐led and market‐oriented: a matter of balance , 1999 .

[5]  Helena Forsman,et al.  Improving Innovation Capabilities Of Small Enterprises: Cluster Strategy As A Tool , 2009 .

[6]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[7]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[8]  Gianmario Verona,et al.  Unbundling Dynamic Capabilities: an Exploratory Study of Continuous Product Innovation , 2003 .

[9]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[10]  E. Carayannis,et al.  A CROSS-CULTURAL LEARNING STRATEGY FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATION: OUTLINE OF KEY CONCEPTS AND LESSONS LEARNED FROM A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP STUDENTS IN FRANCE AND THE US , 2003 .

[11]  P. Senge.  THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[12]  Andreas Herrmann,et al.  An empirical study of the antecedents for radical product innovations and capabilities for transformation , 2007 .

[13]  J.A.G. van Kleef,et al.  Developing capabilities and competence for sustainable business management as innovation: a research agenda , 2007 .

[14]  Mohan Subramaniam,et al.  The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities , 2005 .

[15]  Roger Sørheim,et al.  Action-based entrepreneurship education , 2006 .

[16]  S. Kothari,et al.  Sweep or seep? Structure, culture, enterprise and universities , 2007 .

[17]  M. Kotabe,et al.  The role of strategic alliances in high‐technology new product development , 1995 .

[18]  John C. Narver,et al.  Market Orientation and the Learning Organization , 1995 .

[19]  L. Pellegrini,et al.  Continuous and Discontinuous Innovation: Overcoming the Innovator Dilemma , 2007 .

[20]  Erwin Danneels.  The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[21]  George T. Solomon.  An examination of entrepreneurship education in the United States , 2007 .

[22]  John Bessant,et al.  Enabling Continuous and Discontinuous Innovation: Learning From the Private Sector , 2005 .

[23]  A. Gibb.  Enterprise Culture and Education , 1993 .

[24]  O. Branzei,et al.  Strategic pathways to product innovation capabilities in SMEs , 2006 .

[25]  John C. Narver,et al.  RESEARCH NOTES AND COMMUNICATIONS CUSTOMER-LED AND MARKET-ORIENTED : LET ’ S NOT CONFUSE THE TWO , 2008 .

[26]  G. Lumpkin,et al.  Innovation as newness: what is new, how new, and new to whom? , 2001 .

[27]  Ari Jantunen,et al.  Linking dynamic-capability portfolios and innovation outcomes , 2009 .

[28]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[29]  B. Asheim.  DIFFERENTIATED KNOWLEDGE BASES AND VARIETIES OF REGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS , 2007 .

[30]  J. Fiet.  The Pedagogical Side of Entrepreneurship Theory , 2001 .

[31]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models , 1996 .

[32]  Mark P. Rice,et al.  Opportunity Recognition and Breakthrough Innovation in Large Established Firms , 2001 .

[33]  Wayne A. Long,et al.  Entrepreneurship education in the nineties , 1987 .

[34]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[35]  John Bessant,et al.  KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT ROUTINES FOR INNOVATION PROJECTS: DEVELOPING A HIERARCHICAL PROCESS MODEL , 2003 .

[36]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[37]  J. Deschamps,et al.  Different leadership skills for different innovation strategies , 2005 .

[38]  Thuhang Tran,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Learning Culture and Innovation Schema , 2008 .