Three-Operator Proximal Splitting Scheme for 3-D Seismic Data Reconstruction

The proximal splitting algorithm, which reduces complex convex optimization problems into a series of smaller subproblems and spreads the projection operator onto a convex set into the proximity operator of a convex function, has recently been introduced in the area of signal processing. Following the splitting framework, we propose a novel three-operator proximal splitting (TOPS) algorithm for 3-D seismic data reconstruction with both singular value decomposition (SVD)-based low-rank constraint and curvelet-domain sparsity constraint. Compared with the well-known forward–backward splitting (FBS) method, our proposed TOPS algorithm can be flexibly employed to recover a signal satisfying double convex constraints simultaneously, such as low-rank constraint and sparsity constraint used in this letter. We have used both synthetic and field data examples to demonstrate the superior performance of the TOPS method over traditional SVD-based low-rank method and curvelet-domain sparsity method based on the FBS framework.

[1]  Damek Davis,et al.  A Three-Operator Splitting Scheme and its Optimization Applications , 2015, 1504.01032.

[2]  Yangkang Chen,et al.  Iterative Deblending With Multiple Constraints Based on Shaping Regularization , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[3]  Paul Tseng,et al.  A Modified Forward-backward Splitting Method for Maximal Monotone Mappings 1 , 1998 .

[4]  David Le Meur,et al.  Multidimensional simultaneous random plus erratic noise attenuation and interpolation for seismic data by joint low-rank and sparse inversion , 2015 .

[5]  Weilin Huang,et al.  Simultaneous denoising and reconstruction of 5-D seismic data via damped rank-reduction method , 2016 .

[6]  I. Daubechies,et al.  Accelerated Projected Gradient Method for Linear Inverse Problems with Sparsity Constraints , 2007, 0706.4297.

[7]  Patrick L. Combettes,et al.  Proximal Splitting Methods in Signal Processing , 2009, Fixed-Point Algorithms for Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering.

[8]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  High‐resolution velocity gathers and offset space reconstruction , 1995 .

[9]  P. Lions,et al.  Splitting Algorithms for the Sum of Two Nonlinear Operators , 1979 .

[10]  D. Youla,et al.  Image Restoration by the Method of Convex Projections: Part 1ߞTheory , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Laurent Demanet,et al.  Fast Discrete Curvelet Transforms , 2006, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[12]  R. Abma,et al.  3D interpolation of irregular data with a POCS algorithm , 2006 .

[13]  Patrick L. Combettes,et al.  Signal Recovery by Proximal Forward-Backward Splitting , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[14]  Gregory B. Passty Ergodic convergence to a zero of the sum of monotone operators in Hilbert space , 1979 .

[15]  Yangkang Chen,et al.  Hybrid rank-sparsity constraint model for simultaneous reconstruction and denoising of 3D seismic data , 2017 .

[16]  Yangkang Chen,et al.  Simultaneous-Source Separation Using Iterative Seislet-Frame Thresholding , 2016, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[17]  Ali Gholami,et al.  Morphological deconvolutionMorphological deconvolution , 2017 .

[18]  Mohamed-Jalal Fadili,et al.  A Generalized Forward-Backward Splitting , 2011, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[19]  Paul Sava,et al.  Madagascar: open-source software project for multidimensional data analysis and reproducible computational experiments , 2013 .