Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery: An Admission Scoring System
暂无分享,去创建一个
A. Geiger | B L Flamm | A M Geiger | B. Flamm
[1] A F Olshan,et al. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.
[2] J. Lomas,et al. Explaining variations in cesarean section rates: patients, facilities or policies? , 1985, Canadian Medical Association journal.
[3] V. Parisi,et al. Obstetric parameters affecting success in a trial of labor: designation of a scoring system. , 1992, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[4] S. Shiboski,et al. Predictors of repeat cesarean delivery after trial of labor: do any exist? , 1996, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.
[5] B L Flamm,et al. Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery: Results of a 5‐Year Multicenter Collaborative Study , 1990, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[6] P J Placek,et al. Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise. , 1987, American journal of public health.
[7] B L Flamm,et al. Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery Versus Trial of Labor: A Prospective Multicenter Study , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[8] R. Stafford. The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section. , 1991 .
[9] B. Flamm. Once a cesarean, always a controversy. , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.