Different Smad2 partners bind a common hydrophobic pocket in Smad2 via a defined proline‐rich motif

Transforming growth factor‐β (TGF‐β)/activin‐induced Smad2/Smad4 complexes are recruited to different promoter elements by transcription factors, such as Fast‐1 or the Mix family proteins Mixer and Milk, through a direct interaction between Smad2 and a common Smad interaction motif (SIM) in the transcription factors. Here we identify residues in the SIM critical for Mixer–Smad2 interaction and confirm their functional importance by demonstrating that only Xenopus and zebrafish Mix family members containing a SIM with all the correct critical residues can bind Smad2 and mediate TGF‐β‐induced transcriptional activation in vivo. We identify significant sequence similarity between the SIM and the Smad‐binding domain (SBD) of the membrane‐associated protein SARA (Smad anchor for receptor activation). Molecular modelling, supported by mutational analyses of Smad2 and the SIM and the demonstration that the SARA SBD competes directly with the SIM for binding to Smad2, indicates that the SIM binds Smad2 in the same hydrophobic pocket as does the proline‐rich rigid coil region of the SARA SBD. Thus, different Smad2 partners, whether cytoplasmic or nuclear, interact with the same binding pocket in Smad2 through a common proline‐rich motif.

[1]  F. Rosa Mix.1, a homeobox mRNA inducible by mesoderm inducers, is expressed mostly in the presumptive endodermal cells of Xenopus embryos , 1989, Cell.

[2]  C. Desplan,et al.  Cooperative dimerization of paired class homeo domains on DNA. , 1993, Genes & development.

[3]  D. Melton,et al.  Mixer, a homeobox gene required for endoderm development. , 1998, Science.

[4]  Xin Chen,et al.  A transcriptional partner for MAD proteins in TGF-β signalling , 1996, Nature.

[5]  R. Treisman,et al.  The Rho family GTPases RhoA, Racl , and CDC42Hsregulate transcriptional activation by SRF , 1995, Cell.

[6]  Liliana Attisano,et al.  SARA, a FYVE Domain Protein that Recruits Smad2 to the TGFβ Receptor , 1998, Cell.

[7]  J. Massagué,et al.  Structural basis of Smad2 recognition by the Smad anchor for receptor activation. , 2000, Science.

[8]  한평림 A Transcriptional Partner for MAD Proteins in TGF - b Signalling , 1996 .

[9]  L. Baudhuin,et al.  Sphingosylphosphorylcholine is a ligand for ovarian cancer G-protein-coupled receptor 1 , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[10]  C. M. Jones,et al.  BMP signalling in early Xenopus development , 1999, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[11]  C. Hill,et al.  Transforming Growth Factor β-Independent Shuttling of Smad4 between the Cytoplasm and Nucleus , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[12]  Benoy M. Chacko,et al.  The L3 loop and C-terminal phosphorylation jointly define Smad protein trimerization , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[13]  S. Germain,et al.  Homeodomain and winged-helix transcription factors recruit activated Smads to distinct promoter elements via a common Smad interaction motif. , 2000, Genes & development.

[14]  C. Wylie,et al.  Maternal VegT is the initiator of a molecular network specifying endoderm in Xenopus laevis. , 2001, Development.

[15]  R. Treisman,et al.  The POZ domain: a conserved protein-protein interaction motif. , 1994, Genes & development.

[16]  M. Ptashne,et al.  A vector for expressing GAL4(1-147) fusions in mammalian cells. , 1989, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  B. Eickholt,et al.  Sema3A-induced growth-cone collapse is mediated by Rac1 amino acids 17–32 , 1999, Current Biology.

[18]  J. Massagué,et al.  Transcriptional control by the TGF‐β/Smad signaling system , 2000 .

[19]  Yigong Shi,et al.  A structural basis for mutational inactivation of the tumour suppressor Smad4 , 1997, Nature.

[20]  D. Stainier,et al.  casanova plays an early and essential role in endoderm formation in zebrafish. , 1999, Developmental biology.

[21]  K. Miyazono,et al.  Signaling inputs converge on nuclear effectors in TGF-β signaling , 2000 .

[22]  A. Schier,et al.  Nodal signalling in vertebrate development , 2000, Nature.

[23]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[24]  Minoru Watanabe,et al.  Smad4 and FAST-1 in the assembly of activin-responsive factor , 1997, Nature.

[25]  S. Valgeirsdóttir,et al.  Xenopus Smad4beta is the co-Smad component of developmentally regulated transcription factor complexes responsible for induction of early mesodermal genes. , 1999, Developmental biology.

[26]  M J Sternberg,et al.  Model building by comparison at CASP3: Using expert knowledge and computer automation , 1999, Proteins.

[27]  Yigong Shi,et al.  Structural insights on Smad function in TGFβ signaling , 2001 .

[28]  K. Sharp,et al.  Protein folding and association: Insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons , 1991, Proteins.

[29]  J. Massagué,et al.  The nuclear import function of Smad2 is masked by SARA and unmasked by TGFb-dependent phosphorylation , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[30]  E. Nishida,et al.  Identification of Two Smad4 Proteins in Xenopus , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  P. Lemaire,et al.  A novel Xenopus mix-like gene milk involved in the control of the endomesodermal fates. , 1998, Development.

[32]  J. Smith,et al.  Bix1, a direct target of Xenopus T-box genes, causes formation of ventral mesoderm and endoderm. , 1998, Development.

[33]  J. Massagué,et al.  Determinants of specificity in TGF-beta signal transduction. , 1998, Genes & development.

[34]  C. Hill TGF-β signalling pathways in early Xenopus development , 2001 .

[35]  Le A. Trinh,et al.  The zebrafish bonnie and clyde gene encodes a Mix family homeodomain protein that regulates the generation of endodermal precursors. , 2000, Genes & development.

[36]  M. Howell,et al.  XSmad2 directly activates the activin‐inducible, dorsal mesoderm gene XFKH1 in Xenopus embryos , 1997, The EMBO journal.