E-Mentoring for All

Electronic mentoring appears to have great potential for youth with special needs since it is an accessible communication medium that provides an opportunity to exchange practical information and support and to experience an accepting relationship with less prejudice. To date, few electronic mentoring intervention programs have been designed especially to support the psychological needs of youth with special needs. This paper presents the results of a study that evaluated an electronic mentoring intervention program designed to provide social and emotional support for proteges with disabilities by mentors who also have disabilities. Using a primarily qualitative research design, the study characterized the electronic mentoring process and its contributions to this population. The findings provided support for the potential of electronic mentoring for personal development and empowerment of youth with special needs. Furthermore, the findings supported the usability and utility of the e-mentoring intervention based on a conceptual framework that characterized an electronic support process for people with special needs. Implications for implementing feasible electronic mentoring programs are discussed.

[1]  Renée Spencer,et al.  Mentoring relationships from early adolescence through emerging adulthood: A qualitative analysis , 2008 .

[2]  Patrice L. Weiss,et al.  E-mentoring for Youth with Special Needs: Preliminary Results , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[3]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1987 .

[4]  Deborah I. Fels,et al.  PEBBLES: A Personal Technology for Meeting Educational, Social and Emotional Needs of Hospitalised Children , 2001, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[5]  John McLaughlin,et al.  Research Methods in Special Education , 1994 .

[6]  Jonathan E. Cook,et al.  Working Alliance in Online Therapy as Compared to Face-to-Face Therapy: Preliminary Results , 2002, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[7]  Marc A Zimmerman,et al.  Natural Mentors and Adolescent Resiliency: A Study with Urban Youth , 2002, American journal of community psychology.

[8]  Jason S. Zack,et al.  Online therapy: review of relevant definitions, debates, and current empirical support. , 2004, Journal of clinical psychology.

[9]  G. Thornicroft,et al.  Social Networks and Mental Health Service Utilisation - a Literature Review , 1998, The International journal of social psychiatry.

[10]  Asher Shkedi,et al.  Multiple Case Narrative: A qualitative approach to studying multiple populations , 2005 .

[11]  C. Sullivan,et al.  Gendered Cybersupport: A Thematic Analysis of Two Online Cancer Support Groups , 2003, Journal of health psychology.

[12]  Suzanne Pingree,et al.  Effects of Insightful Disclosure Within Computer Mediated Support Groups on Women With Breast Cancer , 2006, Health communication.

[13]  Neil S. Coulson,et al.  Receiving Social Support Online: An Analysis of a Computer-Mediated Support Group for Individuals Living with Irritable Bowel Syndrome , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[14]  J. Rhodes,et al.  The Test of Time: Predictors and Effects of Duration in Youth Mentoring Relationships , 2002, American journal of community psychology.

[15]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social Cues and Impression Formation in CMC , 2003 .

[16]  M. White,et al.  Receiving social support online: implications for health education. , 2001, Health education research.

[17]  P. Weiss,et al.  A conceptual framework for electronic socio-emotional support for people with special needs , 2009, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[18]  E. Blechman,et al.  MENTORING SPECIAL YOUTH POPULATIONS , 2006 .

[19]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  E-empowerment: Empowerment by the Internet , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Adam N. Joinson,et al.  Privacy and self-disclosure online , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[21]  John Suler,et al.  Fostering empowerment in online support groups , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  D. Rutter,et al.  Looking and Seeing: The Role of Visual Communication in Social Interaction , 1984 .

[23]  N. Silverthorn,et al.  Research methodology and youth mentoring , 2006 .

[24]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[25]  R. Rice,et al.  The Internet and Health Communication , 2000 .

[26]  Sarah R. Lowe,et al.  Youth Mentoring and Resilience: Implications for Practice , 2008 .

[27]  V. Derlega,et al.  Self-disclosure : theory, research, and therapy , 1987 .

[28]  Colin G Pottie,et al.  Friendships between persons with and without developmental disabilities. , 2004, Mental retardation.

[29]  Terri A. Scandura,et al.  E-mentoring: Implications for organizational learning and development in a wired world , 2003 .

[30]  Martine Smith,et al.  The Dual Challenges of Aided Communication and Adolescence , 2005 .

[31]  Renée Spencer,et al.  Understanding the Mentoring Process between Adolescents and Adults , 2006 .

[32]  David L. DuBois,et al.  Handbook of Youth Mentoring , 2005 .

[33]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[34]  Mark S. Granovetter T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[35]  G. Chelune Self-disclosure : origins, patterns, and implications of openness in interpersonal relationships , 1979 .

[36]  J. Rhodes Improving Youth Mentoring Interventions Through Research-based Practice , 2008, American journal of community psychology.

[37]  J. Rhodes A Model of Youth Mentoring. , 2005 .

[38]  Jennifer McMaken,et al.  Making a Difference in Schools: The Big Brothers Big Sisters School-Based Mentoring Impact Study. , 2007 .

[39]  T. Albrecht,et al.  Communicating Social Support , 1987 .

[40]  Kevin B. Wright,et al.  Health-related Support Groups on the Internet: Linking Empirical Findings to Social Support and Computer-mediated Communication Theory , 2003, Journal of health psychology.

[41]  Susan B. Barnes Computer-Mediated Communication: Human-to-Human Communication Across the Internet , 2002 .

[42]  J. Suhr,et al.  Controllability of Stressful Events and Satisfaction With Spouse Support Behaviors , 1992 .

[43]  K. Wright,et al.  Perceptions of on‐line support providers: An examination of perceived homophily, source credibility, communication and social support within on‐line support groups , 2000 .

[44]  T. Postmes,et al.  Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization , 2002 .

[45]  Jeffrey C. Valentine,et al.  Effectiveness of Mentoring Programs for Youth: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2002, American journal of community psychology.

[46]  L. Tidwell,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication Effects on Disclosure, Impressions, and Interpersonal Evaluations: Getting to Know One Another a Bit at a Time , 2002 .

[47]  Janice Light,et al.  Use of electronic communication to develop Mentor-Protégé relationships between adolescent and adult AAC users: Pilot study , 2000 .

[48]  Renée Spencer,et al.  Online Mentoring: The Promise and Challenges of an Emerging Approach to Youth Development , 2006, Journal of Primary Prevention.

[49]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[50]  Anita L. Blanchard,et al.  Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: New directions in research , 2003 .

[51]  David L. DuBois,et al.  Mentoring Relationships and Programs for Youth , 2008, Current Directions in Psychological Science.

[52]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology , 2007 .

[53]  Melinda A. Green,et al.  Online versus face-to-face conversation: An examination of relational and discourse variables. , 2003 .

[54]  S. Burgstahler,et al.  Supporting Peer–Peer and Mentor–Protégé Relationships on the Internet , 2001 .

[55]  J. Walther Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[56]  D. Ford,et al.  Internet support groups for depression: a 1-year prospective cohort study. , 2002, The American journal of psychiatry.

[57]  John Suler,et al.  The psychology of cyberspace , 2004 .

[58]  Natilene Bowker,et al.  Understanding Positive Subjectivities Made Possible Online for Disabled People , 2007 .

[59]  Elisheva F. Gross,et al.  Internet Use and Well-Being in Adolescence , 2002 .

[60]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[61]  Jennifer Tichon,et al.  The Process of Sharing Social Support in Cyberspace , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[62]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[63]  Susan X. Day,et al.  Online Counseling , 2005 .

[64]  J. Rhodes,et al.  Agents of change: pathways through which mentoring relationships influence adolescents' academic adjustment. , 2000, Child development.

[65]  J. Walther Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[66]  Azy Barak,et al.  Degree and Reciprocity of Self-Disclosure in Online Forums , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[67]  Naida Silverthorn,et al.  Natural mentoring relationships and adolescent health: evidence from a national study. , 2005, American journal of public health.

[68]  V. Pitts,et al.  Illness and Internet Empowerment: Writing and Reading Breast Cancer in Cyberspace , 2004, Health.

[69]  T. Hasselbring,et al.  Use of computer technology to help students with special needs. , 2000, The Future of children.

[70]  Fiona Stewart,et al.  Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online , 2000 .

[71]  Azy Barak,et al.  Internet use and personal empowerment of hearing-impaired adolescents , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[72]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  The internet and health communication : experience and expectations , 2001 .

[73]  A. Barak,et al.  A Comprehensive Review and a Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Internet-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions , 2008 .

[74]  Daniel K. Davies,et al.  Technology Use by Students with Intellectual Disabilities: An Overview , 2004 .

[75]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Two faces of anonymity: Paradoxical effects of cues to identity in CMC , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[76]  A. Joinson Self‐disclosure in computer‐mediated communication: The role of self‐awareness and visual anonymity , 2001 .

[77]  R. L. Archer,et al.  Disclosure reciprocity and its limits: A reactance analysis , 1978 .