Perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prognostic significance.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Liang Cheng | J. Daggy | M. Koch | J. Ng
[1] C. Roehrborn,et al. Lymphovascular invasion is a pathological feature of biologically aggressive disease in patients treated with radical prostatectomy. , 2004, The Journal of urology.
[2] C. Sheehan,et al. Prognostic factors in prostate cancer. , 2003, American journal of clinical pathology.
[3] Liang Cheng,et al. Predicting tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens from patients with prostate cancer. , 2003, American journal of clinical pathology.
[4] P. Humphrey,et al. Multiple Measures of Carcinoma Extent Versus Perineural Invasion in Prostate Needle Biopsy Tissue in Prediction of Pathologic Stage in a Screening Population , 2003, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[5] S. Freedland,et al. Percent prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer is more predictive of biochemical failure or adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen or Gleason score. , 2002, The Journal of urology.
[6] F. Ozcan. Correlation of perineural invasion on radical prostatectomy specimens with other pathologic prognostic factors and PSA failure. , 2001, European urology.
[7] M. Kattan,et al. Prognostic significance of the diameter of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2001, Human pathology.
[8] J. Cheville,et al. Predicting prostate carcinoma volume and stage at radical prostatectomy by assessing needle biopsy specimens for percent surface area and cores positive for carcinoma, perineural invasion, Gleason score, DNA ploidy and proliferation, and preoperative serum prostate specific antigen , 2001 .
[9] D. Parekh,et al. Characterization and predictors of prostate specific antigen progression rates after radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.
[10] D. Bostwick,et al. Preoperative prediction of surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[11] M E Hammond,et al. Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. , 2000, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[12] J. Endrizzi,et al. The relationship between early biochemical failure and perineural invasion in pathological T2 prostate cancer , 2000, BJU international.
[13] M. Rubin,et al. Relationship and significance of greatest percentage of tumor and perineural invasion on needle biopsy in prostatic adenocarcinoma. , 2000, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[14] M. Rubin,et al. Perineural invasion on prostate needle biopsy: an independent predictor of final pathologic stage. , 1999, Urology.
[15] A. Renshaw,et al. Perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsy specimens. Correlation with extraprostatic extension at resection. , 1999, American journal of clinical pathology.
[16] P. Troncoso,et al. Prostate cancer staging: correlation between ultrasound determined tumor contact length and pathologically confirmed extraprostatic extension. , 1998, The Journal of urology.
[17] D. Bostwick,et al. Prediction of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer based on needle biopsy findings: perineural invasion lacks significance on multivariate analysis. , 1997, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[18] D P Byar,et al. Carcinoma of the prostate: Prognostic evaluation of certain pathologic features in 208 radical prostatectomies , 1972 .
[19] A. Partin,et al. Influence of biopsy perineural invasion on long-term biochemical disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy. , 2002, Urology.
[20] C. Compton,et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual , 2002, Springer New York.