After Effect of Seen Movement: Evidence for Peripheral and Central Components

Three experiments showed that the movement after-effect (MAE) contains both peripheral and central components. In Experiment I, the left eye viewed a sectored disc rotating to the left, and the right eye viewed a disc rotating to the right, on corresponding retinal areas. Result: when each eye in turn then viewed a stationary disc, the left eye saw a MAE to the right, and the right eye a MAE to the left. These MAEs must be peripheral. In Experiment II, it was arranged that the movement information was shared out between the eyes, using a ring of lights which were switched on and off to give rotating phi movement. It was arranged that each eye on its own saw a random flashing oscillation but the two eyes together saw rotation anticlockwise. Result: a clockwise MAE was seen, which must be central. In Experiment III, the switching programme was modified to arrange that now each eye on its own saw rotation clockwise, but the two eyes together saw rotation anticlockwise. Result: a clockwise MAE was seen, which must be central. (Peripheral MAEs from each eye on its own would have been anticlockwise.)

[1]  T. R. Scott,et al.  Retinal anoxia and the locus of the after-effect of motion. , 1966, The American journal of psychology.

[2]  S. Anstis Generation of a Spiral After-effect by Interaction of Rods and Cones , 1965, Nature.

[3]  Stuart Anstis,et al.  The After-effect of Seen Motion: The Role of Retinal Stimulation and of Eye Movements , 1965 .

[4]  B. Julesz TEXTURE AND VISUAL PERCEPTION. , 1965, Scientific American.

[5]  S. Freud THE PHYSIOLOGICAL LOCUS OF THE SPIRAL AFTER-EFFECT. , 1964, The American journal of psychology.

[6]  M. Jeeves,et al.  The Origin of the After-effect of Movement , 1964 .

[7]  S. Anstis After-effect of Seen Motion : Transfer from Rods to Cones and Vice Versa , 1964, Nature.

[8]  H. Barlow,et al.  Inter-ocular Transfer of Movement After-effects during Pressure Blinding of the Stimulated Eye , 1963, Nature.

[9]  Hermann von Helmholtz,et al.  Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1962 .

[10]  H. W. Turnbull,et al.  Correspondence of Isaac Newton , 1961, Nature.

[11]  H. Holland,et al.  The Archimedes Spiral , 1957, Nature.

[12]  J. Weitz,et al.  Central and peripheral factors in the phi phenomenon. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  J. A. Gengerelli,et al.  Apparent movement in relation to homonymous and heteronymous stimulation of the cerebral hemispheres. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  P. A. Kolers SOME DIFFERENCES BETWEEN REAL AND APPARENT VISUAL MOVEMENT. , 1963, Vision research.

[15]  K. Smith Visual apparent movement in the absence of neural interaction. , 1948, The American journal of psychology.

[16]  G. Durup I. Le Problme des impressions de mouvement conscutives d'ordre visuel , 1928 .

[17]  W. S. Hunter The after-effect of visual motion. , 1914 .