Analytical determination of the soil temperature distribution and freezing front position for linear arrangement of freezing pipes using the undetermined coefficient method

Abstract When on-site tests are performed in artificial ground freezing projects, the conventional analytical method for determining the soil temperature field often presents significant error under certain conditions, particularly when the temperature-measuring pipe is far removed from the freezing front. This paper proposes a new method—called the undetermined coefficient method (UCM)—that more accurately predicts the actual soil temperature field and position of the freezing front. The UCM comprises a new mathematical formula developed based on a series of model tests performed under three different conditions—no seepage, constant seepage, and sudden seepage—and a multiple data regression analysis-based method for determining the coefficients in the developed formula. The proposed UCM was compared to a conventional analytical method based on the results from model tests and from the construction of the cross-channel of Guangzhou Metro Line 11. The results indicated that the UCM presented higher stability and practical value than conventional alternatives and could accurately predict the actual soil temperature field and position of the freezing front. Therefore, the UCM is expected to be of high practical value in artificial ground-freezing operations.

[1]  A. Marui,et al.  The aftermath of the Fukushima nuclear accident: Measures to contain groundwater contamination. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Xiang-dong Hu,et al.  Analytical solution to steady-state temperature field with typical freezing tube layout employed in freeze-sealing pipe roof method , 2018, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology.

[3]  Shibing Huang,et al.  Study on the influence of water flow on temperature around freeze pipes and its distribution optimization during artificial ground freezing , 2018 .

[4]  Xiang-dong Hu,et al.  Analytical solution to temperature distribution in frozen soil wall with wavy boundaries by single-row- and double-row-piped freezing , 2018 .

[5]  B. Ma,et al.  Design of the Gongbei tunnel using a very large cross-section pipe-roof and soil freezing method , 2018 .

[6]  Yu Feng Analysis of Trupak and Bakholdin Formulas for Temperature Field of Single-Row-Pipe Frozen Soil Wall , 2008 .

[7]  S. Ghoreishi‐Madiseh,et al.  On the concept of the freezing-on-demand (FoD) in artificial ground freezing for long-term applications , 2019, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer.

[8]  Zhishu Yao,et al.  Model test and numerical simulation of frost heave during twin-tunnel construction using artificial ground-freezing technique , 2019, Computers and Geotechnics.

[9]  Yang Wang,et al.  Analytical solution to steady-state temperature field for straight-row-piped freezing based on superposition of thermal potential , 2017 .

[10]  Paul C. Schmall,et al.  Ground Freezing - A Viable and Versatile Construction Technique , 2006 .

[11]  Xiang-dong Hu,et al.  Mathematical solution of steady-state temperature field of circular frozen wall by single-circle-piped freezing , 2018 .

[12]  Gianpiero Russo,et al.  Artificial Ground Freezing to excavate a tunnel in sandy soil. Measurements and back analysis , 2015 .

[13]  F. H. Sayles,et al.  Thermal and rheological computations for artificially frozen ground construction , 1979 .