Government centrality to university–industry interactions: University research centers and the industry involvement of academic researchers

This paper uses data from a national survey of academic researchers in the US to detect how different types of university research centers affect individual-level university-industry interactions. The results suggest that while affiliation with an industry-related center correlates positively with the likelihood of an academic researcher having had any research-related interactions with private companies, affiliation with centers sponsored by government centers programs correlates positively with the level of industry involvement, no matter whether these centers additionally have ties to private companies. The analysis takes the "scientific and technical human capital" approach, which draws from theories of social capital and human capital and proves useful for framing the institutional and resource-based perspectives that characterize much of the literature on university-industry interactions. The scientific and technical human capital approach is taken because its emphasis on the research capacities of individual academic researchers provides a more direct explanation of government centrality to academic researchers' industry involvement than provide either the resource-based or institutional views. Implications for policy and management as well as for future applications of the scientific and technical human capital approach are discussed.

[1]  Renee C. Friedman,et al.  Beyond academic departments , 1972 .

[2]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Researchers’ Industry Experience and Productivity in University–Industry Research Centers: A “Scientific and Technical Human Capital” Explanation , 2006 .

[3]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[4]  R. Geiger.  Organized Research Units—Their Role in the Development of University Research , 1990 .

[5]  Monica Gaughan,et al.  Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[6]  Catherine P. Ailes,et al.  Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: evidence from engineering research centers , 2002 .

[7]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[8]  John A. List,et al.  The Unintended Disincentive in the Clean Air Act , 2004 .

[9]  Monica Gaughan,et al.  National science training policy and early scientific careers in France and the United States , 2004 .

[10]  Sujit Bhattacharya,et al.  Industrial linkages in Indian universities: What they reveal and what they imply? , 2007, Scientometrics.

[11]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity , 2005 .

[12]  P. Ingram,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Strategic Management , 2002 .

[13]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[14]  N. Augustine.  Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future , 2006 .

[15]  J. S. Long,et al.  Organizational Context and Scientific Productivity , 1981 .

[16]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The NSF Engineering Research Centers and the University–Industry Research Revolution: A Brief History Featuring an Interview with Erich Bloch , 2004 .

[17]  Robert J. W. Tijssen,et al.  Universities and industrially relevant science: Towards measurement models and indicators of entrepreneurial orientation , 2006 .

[18]  Sheila Slaughter,et al.  Academic capitalism and the new economy , 1997 .

[19]  Juan D. Rogers,et al.  A churn model of scientific knowledge value: Internet researchers as a knowledge value collective , 2002 .

[20]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  FIRM SIZE AND TECHNOLOGY CENTRALITY IN INDUSTRY-UNIVERSITY INTERACTIONS , 2002 .

[21]  F. J. Rijnsoever,et al.  A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers , 2008 .

[22]  Sally Davenport.  Panic and panacea: brain drain and science and technology human capital policy , 2004 .

[23]  Jan Youtie,et al.  Institutionalization of University Research Centers: The Case of the National Cooperative Program in Infertility Research , 2006 .

[24]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[25]  G. Melin.  Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level , 2000 .

[26]  Craig Boardman,et al.  Role Strain in University Research Centers , 2007 .

[27]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry , 2007 .

[28]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[29]  A. Pakes,et al.  Does Federal Research Funding Increase University Research Output? , 2003 .

[30]  S. Box,et al.  Scientific identity, occupational selection, and role strain. , 1966, The British journal of sociology.

[31]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  The Endless Transition: A "Triple Helix" of University-Industry-Government Relations , 2014 .

[32]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital , 2004 .

[33]  C. Argyris,et al.  The applicability of organizational sociology , 1973 .

[34]  Branco Ponomariov,et al.  Effects of university characteristics on scientists’ interactions with the private sector: an exploratory assessment , 2008 .

[35]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Technology and Organization Structure: A Re-examination of the Findings of the Aston Group , 1972 .

[36]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[37]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States , 2002 .

[38]  Denis O. Gray,et al.  Industry–University Research Centers: A Multivariate Analysis of Member Retention , 2001 .

[39]  Richard Florida,et al.  The Role of the University: Leveraging Talent, not Technology. , 1999 .

[40]  H. Etzkowitz.  The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages , 1998 .

[41]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Role of Research Centres in the Collectivisation of Academic Science , 1998 .

[42]  B. Clark.  Creating entrepreneurial universities : organizational pathways of transformation , 1998 .

[43]  W. R. Tash,et al.  Centers and Institutes in the Research University: Issues, Problems, and Prospects. , 1994 .

[44]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  University research centers and the composition of research collaborations , 2008 .

[45]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[46]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  Scientists’ Participation in University Research Centers: What are the Gender Differences? , 2005 .

[47]  Steven Brint,et al.  University–industry collaboration: Patterns of growth for low- and middle-level performers , 2005 .

[48]  M. Zajkowski.  Institutional structure and the Australian research director: a qualitative study , 2003 .

[49]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital , 2005 .

[50]  Jason Owen-Smith,et al.  From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities , 2003 .

[51]  P. Craig Boardman,et al.  Reward Systems and NSF University Research Centers: The Impact of Tenure on University Scientists' Valuation of Applied and Commercially Relevant Research , 2007 .

[52]  R. Hall.  Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes , 1987 .

[53]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Managing the New Multipurpose, Multidiscipline University Research Center: Institutional Innovation in the Academic Community , 2003 .

[54]  M. Fischer,et al.  Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants , 2002 .

[55]  Sheila Slaughter,et al.  The “Traffic” in Graduate Students: Graduate Students as Tokens of Exchange between Academe and Industry , 2002 .