Comparison of different base flow separation methods in a lowland catchment

Abstract. Assessment of water resources available in different storages and moving along different pathways in a catchment is important for its optimal use and protection, and also for the prediction of floods and low flows. Moreover, understanding of the runoff generation processes is essential for assessing the impacts of climate and land use changes on the hydrological response of a catchment. Many methods for base flow separation exist, but hardly one focuses on the specific behaviour of temperate lowland areas. This paper presents the results of a base flow separation study carried out in a lowland area in the Netherlands. In this study, field observations of precipitation, groundwater and surface water levels and discharges, together with tracer analysis are used to understand the runoff generation processes in the catchment. Several tracer and non-tracer based base flow separation methods were applied to the discharge time series, and their results are compared. The results show that groundwater levels react fast to precipitation events in this lowland area with shallow groundwater tables. Moreover, a good correlation was found between groundwater levels and discharges suggesting that most of the measured discharge also during floods comes from groundwater storage. It was estimated using tracer hydrological approaches that approximately 90% of the total discharge is groundwater displaced by event water mainly infiltrating in the northern part of the catchment, and only the remaining 10% is surface runoff. The impact of remote recharge causing displacement of near channel groundwater during floods could also be motivated with hydraulic approximations. The results show further that when base flow separation is meant to identify groundwater contributions to stream flow, process based methods (e.g. the rating curve method; Kliner and Knezek, 1974) are more reliable than other simple non-tracer based methods. Also, the recursive filtering method (proposed by Eckhardt, 2005) can be calibrated well using the results of tracer investigation giving good results. Consequently, non-tracer based base flow separation methods that can be validated for some events may provide a powerful tool for groundwater assessment or model calibration/validation in lowland areas.

[1]  J. McDonnell,et al.  A review and evaluation of catchment transit time modeling , 2006 .

[2]  Stefan Uhlenbrook,et al.  Source areas and mixing of runoff components at the hillslope scale—a multi-technical approach , 2008 .

[3]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  Rainfall—runoff response, event-based runoff coefficients and hydrograph separation , 2007 .

[4]  T. McMahon,et al.  Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses , 1990 .

[5]  J. Kirchner,et al.  Fractal stream chemistry and its implications for contaminant transport in catchments , 2000, Nature.

[6]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Hydrology and biogeochemistry of forested catchments , 2001 .

[7]  Theo N Olsthoorn,et al.  Do a Bit More with Convolution , 2008, Ground water.

[8]  H. Aksoy,et al.  Smoothed minima baseflow separation tool for perennial and intermittent streams , 2008 .

[9]  H. Wittenberg.  Baseflow recession and recharge as nonlinear storage processes , 1999 .

[10]  Y. Tardy,et al.  Geochemistry applied to the watershed survey: hydrograph separation, erosion and soil dynamics. A case study: the basin of the Niger River, Africa , 2004 .

[11]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  How does rainfall become runoff? A combined tracer and runoff transfer function approach , 2003 .

[12]  K. Eckhardt.  A comparison of baseflow indices, which were calculated with seven different baseflow separation methods , 2008 .

[13]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Modelling streamwater chemistry as a mixture of soilwater end-members ― an application to the Panola Mountain catchment, Georgia, U.S.A. , 1990 .

[14]  C. Sellinger.  Computer program for performing hydrograph separation using the rating curve method , 1996 .

[15]  Ronald A. Sloto,et al.  HYSEP: A Computer Program for Streamflow Hydrograph Separation and Analysis , 1996 .

[16]  C. Venetis.  Finite aquifers: Characteristic responses and applications , 1970 .

[17]  K. Beven,et al.  Uncertainty in hydrograph separations based on geochemical mixing models. , 2002 .

[18]  L. Tallaksen.  A review of baseflow recession analysis , 1995 .

[19]  J. Kirchner.  A double paradox in catchment hydrology and geochemistry , 2003 .

[20]  P. Burlando,et al.  Hydrograph separation of runoff components based on measuring hydraulic state variables, tracer experiments, and weighting methods , 1999 .

[21]  K. Eckhardt.  How to construct recursive digital filters for baseflow separation , 2005 .

[22]  S. Uhlenbrook,et al.  Quantifying uncertainties in tracer‐based hydrograph separations: a case study for two‐, three‐ and five‐component hydrograph separations in a mountainous catchment , 2003 .

[23]  Tom G. Chapman,et al.  Comment on Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses by R. J. Nathan , 1991 .

[24]  M. Parlange,et al.  Baseflow separation based on analytical solutions of the Boussinesq equation , 1998 .

[25]  F. R. Hall.  Base‐Flow Recessions—A Review , 1968 .

[26]  S. Uhlenbrook,et al.  Hydrograph separations in a mesoscale mountainous basin at event and seasonal timescales , 2002 .

[27]  S. Uhlenbrook,et al.  Experimental evidence of fast groundwater responses in a hillslope/floodplain area in the Black Forest Mountains, Germany , 2004 .

[28]  Stefan Uhlenbrook,et al.  Catchment hydrology—a science in which all processes are preferential , 2006 .

[29]  M. A. Kohler,et al.  Hydrology for engineers , 1958 .

[30]  S. Goldberg.  Geochemistry, Groundwater and Pollution , 2006 .

[31]  N. Su.  The unit hydrograph model for hydrograph separation , 1995 .

[32]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Modelling streamwater chemistry as a mixture of soilwater end-members — A step towards second-generation acidification models , 1990 .