Pooling of Urine Samples for Screening for Neisseria gonorrhoeae by Ligase Chain Reaction: Accuracy and Application

ABSTRACT The accuracy of detection of genital Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in pooled urine samples by ligase chain reaction (LCR) was examined in three populations. Firstly, urine specimens from 300 female military recruits (FMR) were tested by LCR individually and in pools of four and six. Secondly, 300 urine specimens from middle-school students (MSS) were tested individually by LCR, and then the processed specimens were stored frozen for subsequent testing in pools of 4 and 10. Thirdly, 600 frozen urine specimens from high-school students (HSS) were tested by using the LCR pooling algorithm, i.e., testing processed specimens in pools of four in one test unit dose, and retesting individual specimens from positive pools. Finally, the pooling algorithm results were compared to culture results for a subset of 344 students from the original 600 HSS from whom cervical or urethral samples were taken at the discretion of the school nurse practitioners. Compared to individual testing of specimens by LCR in the FMR population, the pooling-by-four algorithm was 100% sensitive (5 of 5) and 100% pool specific (70 of 70), and the pool-by-six algorithm was 100% sensitive (5 of 5) and 100% pool specific (45 of 45). In the MSS population, the pool-by-4 algorithm was 95.8% sensitive (23 of 24) and 100% (52 of 52) pool specific, and the pool-by-10 algorithm was 95.8% sensitive (23 of 24) and 100% (17 of 17) pool specific. In the subset of 344 HSS from whom endocervical or urethral specimens were collected for culture, 31 were positive by LCR in urine and 26 were positive by culture. After results discrepant between culture and LCR were adjudicated by a confirmatory LCR test, the pooling algorithm was 93.8% (30 of 32) sensitive and 99.7% (311 of 312) specific. Culture from these 344 HSS was 81.3% (26 of 32) sensitive. The pooling algorithm reduced the cost of the N. gonorrhoeae LCR assay by 60% compared to individual testing of the HSS specimens and was both sensitive and specific.

[1]  GLOBAL PREVALENCE AND INCIDENCE OF SELECTED CURABLE SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES: OVERVIEW AND ESTIMATES , 2000 .

[2]  P. Piot,et al.  Non-ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases as risk factors for HIV-1 transmission in women: results from a cohort study. , 1993 .

[3]  Ellen Jo Baron,et al.  Manual of clinical microbiology , 1975 .

[4]  L. Birkenmeyer,et al.  Preliminary evaluation of the ligase chain reaction for specific detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae , 1992, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[5]  T. Meyer,et al.  Variation and control of protein expression in Neisseria. , 1990, Annual Review of Microbiology.

[6]  C. Schofield Sexually transmitted disease surveillance. , 1982, British medical journal.

[7]  Helen H. Lee,et al.  Comparison of ligase chain reaction and culture for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in genital and extragenital specimens , 1997, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[8]  Douglas S. Kellogg,et al.  NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE I , 1963, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  T. Eng,et al.  The Hidden Epidemic: Confronting Sexually Transmitted Diseases , 1997 .

[10]  P. Vernazza,et al.  Reduction of concentration of HIV-1 in semen after treatment of urethritis: implications for prevention of sexual transmission of HIV-1 , 1997, The Lancet.

[11]  J. Martin,et al.  Improved medium selective for cultivation of N. gonorrhoeae and N. meningitidis. , 1966, Public health reports.

[12]  M. R. Howell,et al.  Pooling Urine Samples for Ligase Chain Reaction Screening for Genital Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in Asymptomatic Women , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[13]  Helen H. Lee,et al.  Evaluation of ligase chain reaction for use with urine for identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in females attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic , 1995, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[14]  S Zeger,et al.  Evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus seroprevalence in population surveys using pooled sera , 1989, Journal of clinical microbiology.