Probabilistic Discrete Time Robust H2 Controller Design

Optimal ${{\mathcal{H}}_2}$ control theory is appealing, since it allows for optimizing a performance index frequently arising in practical situations. Moreover, in the state feedback case, the resulting closed loop system has an infinite gain margin and a phase margin of at least 60o. However, these properties no longer hold in the output feedback case, where it is well known that there exist cases where the system is arbitrarily fragile. Motivated by this observation, since the early 1980’s a large research effort has been devoted to the problem of designing robust ${{\mathcal{H}}_2}$ controllers. To this effect several relaxations of the original problem have been introduced, but all of these lead to conservative solutions. Surprisingly, the original problem remains, to date, still open. To address this issue, in this paper we present a randomization based algorithm that seeks to solve a relaxation of the original problem. Contrary to existing approaches, the performance of the resulting controller can be made—in a sense precisely defined in the paper—arbitrarily close to the optimal one. These results are illustrated with an academic example.

[1]  Gene F. Franklin,et al.  An error bound for a discrete reduced order model of a linear multivariable system , 1987 .

[2]  Sun-Yuan Kung,et al.  A new identification and model reduction algorithm via singular value decomposition , 1978 .

[3]  G. Stein,et al.  The LQG/LTR procedure for multivariable feedback control design , 1987 .

[4]  Roberto Tempo,et al.  Randomized methods for design of uncertain systems: Sample complexity and sequential algorithms , 2013, Autom..

[5]  W. Haddad,et al.  LQG control with an H∞ performance bound: a riccati equation approach , 1988, 1988 American Control Conference.

[6]  Marco C. Campi,et al.  Complexity-based modulation of the data-set in scenario optimization , 2019, 2019 18th European Control Conference (ECC).

[7]  C. Guaranteed Margins for LQG Regulators , 1972 .

[8]  E. Feron Analysis of Robust H 2 Performance Using Multiplier Theory , 1997 .

[9]  Qing-Guo Wang,et al.  Sequential Randomized Algorithms for Convex Optimization in the Presence of Uncertainty , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[10]  Giuseppe Carlo Calafiore,et al.  Uncertain convex programs: randomized solutions and confidence levels , 2005, Math. Program..

[11]  Fernando Paganini,et al.  Analysis of Robust 3c2 Performance: Comparisons and Examples , 1997 .

[12]  P. Khargonekar,et al.  State-space solutions to standard H2 and H∞ control problems , 1988, 1988 American Control Conference.

[13]  Pablo A. Parrilo,et al.  Robust identification with mixed parametric/nonparametric models and time/frequency-domain experiments: theory and an application , 2001, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[14]  Pablo A. Parrilo,et al.  Mixed time/frequency-domain based robust identification , 1998, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[15]  Pablo A. Parrilo,et al.  A convex approach to robust H2 performance analysis , 2002, Autom..