Views of survivors of stroke on benefits of physiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE--To describe the components of physiotherapy valued by survivors of a stroke. DESIGN--Qualitative study using in-depth interviews. SETTING--Two adjacent districts in North East Thames Regional Health Authority. PATIENTS--82 survivors of stroke taken consecutively from a stroke register when they reached the tenth month after their stroke, 40 of whom agreed to be interviewed. MAIN MEASURES--Content analysis of interviews. RESULTS--Patients who agreed to the interview were significantly less likely to be disabled 12 months after stroke than those who did not. Twenty four patients had received physiotherapy, and these were more disabled than those who had not. Patients appreciated physiotherapy. It was believed to bring about functional improvement; the exercise component was valued because it was perceived to keep them active and busy and exercise programmes to follow at home were also valued for the structure they gave to each day; and therapists were considered a source of advice and information and a source of faith and hope. CONCLUSIONS--Many of the positive aspects of caring which patients described in the context of physiotherapy could be incorporated into the mainstream of rehabilitation care and training. However, health professionals need to be careful not to promote false expectations about recovery. IMPLICATIONS--The outcome of treatment is of critical importance to patients and should become a central dimension of patient satisfaction questionnaires. The impact of physiotherapy is not confined to reducing physical disability but may also affect wellbeing. The choice of outcome measures in rehabilitation research should reflect this situation.

[1]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Patients' satisfaction with stroke services , 1994 .

[2]  S. Chapman,et al.  Unravelling gossamer with boxing gloves: problems in explaining the decline in smoking. , 1993, BMJ.

[3]  C. Pope,et al.  Opening the black box: an encounter in the corridors of health services research. , 1993, BMJ.

[4]  F. Song,et al.  Formal rehabilitation after stroke. , 1992, Quality in health care : QHC.

[5]  D. Wade,et al.  Physiotherapy intervention late after stroke and mobility. , 1992, BMJ.

[6]  N. Freemantle,et al.  Formalrehabilitation after stroke , 1992 .

[7]  R. Tallis Rehabilitation of the Elderly in the 21st Century , 1992, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.

[8]  M. W. Riley,et al.  Sociology of age. , 1988 .

[9]  B. McNeil,et al.  Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. , 1988, Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing.

[10]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature. , 1988, Social science & medicine.

[11]  J A Yesavage,et al.  Geriatric Depression Scale. , 1988, Psychopharmacology bulletin.

[12]  F. Nouri,et al.  An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients , 1987 .

[13]  C. Seale,et al.  Outcome measurement in stroke rehabilitation research. , 1987, International disability studies.

[14]  F. Nouri,et al.  Use of the Nottingham Health Profile with patients after a stroke. , 1986, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[15]  I. Litt,et al.  Satisfaction with health care. A predictor of adolescents' appointment keeping. , 1984, Journal of adolescent health care : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[16]  T. L. Brink,et al.  Screening tests for geriatric depression , 1982 .

[17]  M. Holbrook Stroke: Social and Emotional Outcome , 1982, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.

[18]  J. Hoffmann "Nothing Can Be Done": , 1974 .