Strategic Uses of Social Technology: An interactional approach to social influence in computer-mediated communication
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] K. Douglas,et al. Identifiability and self-presentation: computer-mediated communication and intergroup interaction. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.
[2] Ulrike Cress,et al. An interactional perspective on group awareness: Alleviating the information-exchange dilemma (for everybody?) , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[3] Ulrike Cress,et al. Ambivalent effect of member portraits in virtual groups , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[4] M. Scheier,et al. Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. , 1975 .
[5] Justin Kruger,et al. When what you type isn’t what they read: The perseverance of stereotypes and expectancies over e-mail , 2005 .
[6] L. Cronbach. The two disciplines of scientific psychology. , 1957 .
[7] M. Hogg,et al. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .
[8] Mark P. Zanna,et al. The impact of computer-mediated communication on self-awareness☆ , 1988 .
[9] H. Tajfel,et al. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .
[10] T. Postmes,et al. Computer-Mediated Communication as a Channel for Social Resistance , 2002 .
[11] R. Spears,et al. Knowing Me, Knowing You: Anonymity Effects on Social Identity Processes within Groups , 2001 .
[12] Ben Green,et al. Does 'cyber-conformity' vary cross-culturally? Exploring the effect of culture and communication medium on social conformity , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[13] T. Postmes,et al. Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? , 1998 .
[14] Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al. "On the Internet No One Knows I'm an Introvert": Extroversion, Neuroticism, and Internet Interaction , 2002, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..
[15] Ilze Zigurs,et al. A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1988, MIS Q..
[16] Michael Smilowitz,et al. The Effects of Computer Mediated Communication on an Individual's Judgment: A Study Based on the Methods of Asch's Social Influence Experiment , 1988 .
[17] R. Spears,et al. Social influence and the influence of the 'social' in computer-mediated communication. , 1992 .
[18] Lee Sproull,et al. Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .
[19] G. Hertel,et al. Do Shy People Prefer to Send E-Mail? Personality Effects on Communication Media Preferences in Threatening and Nonthreatening Situations , 2008 .
[20] Charles S. Carver,et al. Divergent Influences of Private and Public Self-Consciousness in a Compliance Paradigm. , 1981 .
[21] O. John,et al. Effects of Visual Perspective and Narcissism on Self-Perception: Is Seeing Believing? , 1997 .
[22] Russell Spears,et al. COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, DEINDIVIDUATION AND GROUP DECISION-MAKING , 1991 .
[23] Margarete Boos,et al. Attitude Change in Computer-Mediated Communication: Effects of Anonymity and Category Norms , 2003 .
[24] M. Deutsch,et al. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.
[25] W. Mischel,et al. A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. , 1995, Psychological review.
[26] R. Cialdini,et al. Online persuasion: An examination of gender differences in computer-mediated interpersonal influence. , 2002 .
[27] Michael F. Scheier,et al. Effects of public and private self-consciousness on the public expression of personal beliefs , 1980 .
[28] P. Huguet,et al. Social presence effects in the Stroop task: further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[29] Tom Postmes,et al. SIDE issues centre stage: Recent developments in studies of de-individuation in groups. , 2000 .
[30] V. L. Allen. Situational Factors In Conformity1 , 1965 .
[31] R. Spears,et al. De‐individuation and group polarization in computer‐mediated communication , 1990 .
[32] Laura A. Peracchio,et al. The Impact of Language and Congruity on Persuasion in Multicultural E‐Marketing , 2003 .
[33] Tom Postmes,et al. SIDE issues centre-stage: Recent developments in studies of deindividuation in groups (pp. 202). Amsterdam: KNAW. , 2000 .
[34] S. R. Hiltz,et al. Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .
[35] A. Joinson. Self‐disclosure in computer‐mediated communication: The role of self‐awareness and visual anonymity , 2001 .
[36] Stephen A. Rains,et al. Leveling the Organizational Playing Field—Virtually , 2005, Commun. Res..
[37] Kerry L. Marsh,et al. Interaction Between Self-Monitoring and Manipulated States of Self-Awareness , 1989 .
[38] Boris Egloff,et al. Interactive effects of state anxiety and trait anxiety on emotional Stroop interference , 2001 .
[39] B. Buunk,et al. Individual differences in social comparison: development of a scale of social comparison orientation. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[40] Ulrike Cress,et al. Group awareness and self-presentation in computer-supported information exchange , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..
[41] J. Walther. Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .
[42] T. Postmes,et al. A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena , 1995 .
[43] Deborah A. Prentice,et al. Asymmetries in Attachments to Groups and to their Members: Distinguishing between Common-Identity and Common-Bond Groups , 1994 .
[44] Clifford Nass,et al. Experimental Tests of Normative Group Influence and Representation Effects in Computer-Mediated Communication: When Interacting Via Computers Differs from Interacting With Computers. , 2002 .
[45] T. T. Postmes,et al. A SIDE View of Social Influence , 2001 .
[46] Nicolas Guéguen. Foot-in-the-door technique and computer-mediated communication , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[47] P. V. Lange,et al. The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. , 1999 .
[48] D. Magnusson,et al. Toward an interactional psychology of personality. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.
[49] Charles D. Spielberger,et al. Anxiety: Current Trends in Theory and Research , 1972 .
[50] Kai J. Jonas,et al. Attitude change and social influence on the net , 2009 .
[51] T. Postmes,et al. Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Effects of Anonymity on Group Behavior , 2001 .
[52] K. Sassenberg. Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. , 2002 .
[53] Margarete Boos,et al. Attitude change in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication: Private self-awareness as mediator and moderator , 2005 .
[54] Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al. Plan 9 From Cyberspace: The Implications of the Internet for Personality and Social Psychology , 2000 .
[55] Sara B. Kiesler,et al. The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..
[56] F. Heider,et al. Principles of topological psychology , 1936 .
[57] Ederyn Williams,et al. Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. , 1977 .
[58] B. Bushman,et al. Moderating role of trait aggressiveness in the effects of violent media on aggression. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[59] Tom Postmes,et al. Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influence. , 2002, The British journal of social psychology.