Students as Literary Critics: The Interpretive Experiences, Beliefs, and Processes of Ninth-Grade Students

The interpretive beliefs, processes, and instructional experiences of 8 ninth-grade students were studied as they participated in instructional subcommunities within their existing English classes. An observational analysis of the instructional communities was undertaken, and the students' interpretive processes were analyzed as intertextual transactions, which include reasoning operations and inference sources. Overall results revealed that students reasoned about literary works at an interpretive level, and that their inferences were largely textual focussing on characters and events, reflecting the type of literary instruction they receive. After participating in an alternative response-centered instructional unit, students were more intertextual in terms of their preferences related to the interpretive process and more interpretive in their reasoning about literary works. The shift in the range of inference sources students drew on—the intertextuality of their transactions—varied by individual. Individual students were profiled to reveal the relationship of beliefs, experiences, and processes that form their critical interpretive stances toward literary works.

[1]  Judith A. Langer.  Learning to Read in Our Nation's Schools: Instruction and Achievement in 1988 at Grades 4, 8, and 12. Report No. 19-R-02. , 1990 .

[2]  Richard Beach,et al.  Developmental Differences in Response to a Story , 1987 .

[3]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Research Act , 1978 .

[4]  Carole A. Cox,et al.  STANCE TOWARDS A LITERARY WORK: APPLYING THE TRANSACTIONAL THEORY TO CHILDREN'S RESPONSES , 1992 .

[5]  Robert Scholes.  Textual Power: Literary Theory and the Teaching of English , 1985 .

[6]  James R. Squire,et al.  The Responses of Adolescents While Reading Four Short Stories. , 1965 .

[7]  J. Marshall.  Patterns of Discourse in Classroom Discussions of Literature. , 1989 .

[8]  Friedrich Wilkening,et al.  Information integration by children , 1980 .

[9]  Susan Hynds,et al.  Interpersonal Cognitive Complexity and the Literary Response Processes of Adolescent Readers. , 1985 .

[10]  A. Purves.  That Sunny Dome: Those Caves of Ice: A Model for Research in Reader Response. , 1979 .

[11]  S. Fish.  Doing What Comes Naturally , 2020 .

[12]  D. Bleich,et al.  Readings and Feelings: An Introduction to Subjective Criticism , 1975 .

[13]  Richard C. Omanson,et al.  An analysis of narratives: Identifying central, supportive, and distracting content∗ , 1982 .

[14]  D. Critchlow,et al.  Detecting a Trend in Paired Rankings , 1992 .

[15]  Stanley Fish,et al.  Is There a Text in This Class? , 1981, Campus Wars.

[16]  Roy O. Freedle.  Advances in discourse processes , 1977 .

[17]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[18]  Gregory L. Ulmer,et al.  The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction , 1981 .

[19]  N. Holland.  5 Readers Reading , 1975 .

[20]  Alan C. Purves,et al.  Elements of Writing About a Literary Work: A Study of Response to Literature , 1978 .

[21]  T. Hawkes.  Structuralism and Semiotics , 1977 .

[22]  Susan Miller,et al.  Is There a Text in This Class , 1982 .

[23]  Bertram C. Bruce.  A social interaction model of reading , 1981 .

[24]  N. S. Johnson,et al.  Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  John Geanakoplos,et al.  Common Knowledge , 1992, TARK.

[26]  Cai Svensson,et al.  The construction of poetic meaning : A cultural-developmental study of symbolic and non-symbolic strategies in the interpretation of contemporary poetry , 1987 .

[27]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  The analysis of cross-classified categorical data , 1980 .

[28]  Lee Galda,et al.  Assuming the Spectator Stance: An Examination of the Responses of Three Young Readers. , 1982 .

[29]  John J. Kennedy,et al.  Applying Log-Linear Models in Educational Research , 1988 .

[30]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Convergence and divergence in reader response to literature , 1986 .

[31]  Douglas R. Barnes.  From communication to curriculum , 1976 .

[32]  Donald L. Rubin,et al.  Perspectives on talk and learning , 1990 .

[33]  Joyce E. Many.  The Effects of Stance and Age Level on Children's Literary Responses , 1991 .

[34]  N. Stein,et al.  An Analysis of Story Comprehension in Elementary School Children: A Test of a Schema. , 1975 .

[35]  Arthur N. Applebee.  The Child's Concept Of Story: Ages Two To Seventeen , 1978 .

[36]  René Wellek,et al.  Theory of Literature , 1948 .

[37]  Alan C. Purves,et al.  Literature and the Reader: Research in Response to Literature, Reading Interests, and the Teaching of Literature. , 1972 .

[38]  Charles R. Cooper,et al.  Researching response to literature and the teaching of literature : points of departure , 1985 .

[39]  Louise M. Rosenblatt,et al.  The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work , 1979 .

[40]  Louise M. Rosenblatt.  The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work , 1978 .

[41]  U. Eco,et al.  The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts , 1980 .

[42]  S. Lehr.  The Child's Developing Sense of Theme: Responses to Literature , 1991 .