The ElarmS Earthquake Early Warning Methodology and Application across California

Earthquake Alarms Systems, ElarmS, is a methodology for providing warning of forthcoming ground shaking during earthquakes. The approach uses a network of seismic instruments to detect the first-arriving energy at the surface, the P-waves, and translate the information contained in these low amplitude waves into a prediction of the peak ground shaking that follows. The instruments closest to the epicenter are the first to detect the seismic energy, and by using a seismic network this information can be integrated to produce a map of future ground shaking everywhere. The ElarmS methodology uses the frequency content of the P-wave arrival to estimate earthquake magnitude, arrival times to determine location, and then predicts the ground shaking using a radial attenuation relation. All data is gathered continuously and the hazard map updated every second. As observations of peak ground shaking are also made close to the epicenter they are integrated into the hazard assessment. Here, the methodology is applied to a set of 32 earthquakes in southern California to assess the accuracy and timeliness of warning if such a system was implemented using the existing seismic network. If there was no data telemetry delays the first warning would be available before the S-wave arrival at the epicenter for 56% of the earthquakes. The average absolute magnitude error at this time is 0.44 units and the error in the average absolute peak ground acceleration [ln(PGApredicted) — ln(PGAobserved)] is 1.08. Within 5 sec warning are available for 97% of the events, the average magnitude error is 0.33 units, and the average PGA error is 1.00. To further assess the utility of ElarmS implementation in California, probabilistic warning time distribution functions are determined for cities in northern California. Using the set of future likely earthquakes provided by the Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (2003) the warning times that the ElarmS methodology could provide (if implemented) can be estimated, and a probability of occurrence associated. The alarm time is defined as the time when 4 sec of P-wave data is available at 4 seismic stations. At this point in time the average magnitude error is 0.5 units. The warning times range from zero seconds to over a minute, the most likely warning times range from seconds to a few tens of seconds depending on location. The largest magnitude earthquakes are also associated with the greatest warning times and it is more likely than not, that San Francisco would receive more than 20 sec warning for earthquakes generating the most damaging ground shaking.

[1]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  TriNet “ShakeMaps”: Rapid Generation of Peak Ground Motion and Intensity Maps for Earthquakes in Southern California , 1999 .

[2]  Mustafa Erdik,et al.  Real-Time Prediction of Ground Motion from P-Wave Records , 2004 .

[3]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Rapid Assessment of Damage Potential of Earthquakes in Taiwan from the Beginning of P Waves , 2005 .

[4]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Experiment on an Onsite Early Warning Method for the Taiwan Early Warning System , 2005 .

[5]  Anthony Lomax,et al.  A Reanalysis of the Hypocentral Location and Related Observations for the Great 1906 California Earthquake , 2005 .

[6]  David M. Boore,et al.  Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake , 1981 .

[7]  Richard M. Allen,et al.  Magnitude-Period Scaling Relations for Japan and the Pacific Northwest: Implications for Earthquake Early Warning , 2007 .

[8]  T. Heaton,et al.  A Model for a Seismic Computerized Alert Network , 1985, Science.

[9]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  Near-source attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration , 1981 .

[10]  Osamu Kamigaichi,et al.  JMA EARTHQUAKE EARLY WARNING , 2004 .

[11]  Tzay-Chyn Shin,et al.  Quick and reliable determination of magnitude for seismic early warning , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[12]  Y. Fujinawa,et al.  An Automatic Processing System for Broadcasting Earthquake Alarms , 2005 .

[13]  B. Bolt.  The focus of the 1906 California earthquake , 1968 .

[14]  Shinji Sato,et al.  A New Method of Quickly Estimating Epicentral Distance and Magnitude from a Single Seismic Record , 2003 .

[15]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  Empirical Near-Source Attenuation Relationships for Horizontal and Vertical Components of Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Pseudo-Absolute Acceleration Response Spectra , 1997 .

[16]  H. Kanamori,et al.  The Potential for Earthquake Early Warning in Southern California , 2003, Science.

[17]  M. Zoback,et al.  Abrupt along-strike change in tectonic style: San Andreas fault zone , 1999 .

[18]  G. Ibarrola,et al.  Mexico City seismic alert system , 1995 .

[19]  Richard M. Allen,et al.  The deterministic nature of earthquake rupture , 2005, Nature.

[20]  Y Nakamura,et al.  REAL-TIME INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR SEISMIC HAZARDS MITIGATION UREDAS, HERAS AND PIC , 1996 .

[21]  Mustafa Erdik,et al.  Istanbul Earthquake Early Warning and Rapid Response System , 2003 .

[22]  R. Youngs,et al.  Attenuation Relationships for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Based on California Strong Motion Data , 1997 .

[23]  Ta-Liang Teng,et al.  A Virtual Subnetwork Approach to Earthquake Early Warning , 2002 .

[24]  Edward H. Field,et al.  A Modified Ground-Motion Attenuation Relationship for Southern California that Accounts for Detailed Site Classification and a Basin-Depth Effect , 2000 .

[25]  Thomas C. Hanks,et al.  An Empirical Model for Earthquake Probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Region, California, 2002-2031 , 2003 .

[26]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Equations for Estimating Horizontal Response Spectra and Peak Acceleration from Western North American Earthquakes: A Summary of Recent Work , 1997 .

[27]  Richard M. Allen,et al.  Single-Station Earthquake Characterization for Early Warning , 2005 .

[28]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Empirical Response Spectral Attenuation Relations for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes , 1997 .

[29]  Attenuation Characteristics of Peak Ground Motions in the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu Earthquake , 1997 .

[30]  David M. Boore,et al.  Strong-motion recordings of the California earthquake of April 18, 1906 , 1977 .

[31]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  Relationships between Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California , 1999 .